GlockTalk.com
Home Forums Classifieds Blogs Today's Posts Search Social Groups



  
SIGN-UP
Notices

Glock Talk
Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-13-2009, 21:59   #1
Ganesh
Okie 4 Life
 
Ganesh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Bradenton, FL.
Posts: 773
Well I took the 340 to the range again today...

Shot 50 standard .38 specials, 50 .38 +P, and 50 fairly warm .357s out of her. Brought her home to clean up. All came fairly clean except up near where the steel plate is located up by the forcing cone and of course, the front of the cylinder. Any of you have good luck gettin the DLC coating cleaned up in those locations or is it just something one has to live with.

I just lived with it on the PD I had before, and never had a problem with it on my stainless models. Just wondered if that finish tended to hold fast to the carbon/scorch marks more.

All I've used on it so far is, remington 40-x bore cleaner in the barrel, hoppe's no. 9 followed next along with the hoppe's and a nylon brush on carbon/scorched surfaces. And Rem oil as a pass through for the barrel.

Finished off by wipin down the whole gun with a rag sprayed lightly with break free clp.

She looks good and clean except for thos two areas, heh. Guess Ive gotten used to my glocks, which wipe up with ease.

What do you guys use?
__________________
S&W 340 M&P
Glock 7(still searching)
Glock Carbine(holding breath)
Glock 18(still in my dreams)
Ganesh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2009, 17:37   #2
Berto
woo woo
 
Berto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: WA
Posts: 28,668


On the Ti/scan guns, I stick with patches on the cylinder, nothing abrasive.
__________________
...Then I found a place it's dark and it's rotted
it's a cool, sweet kinda-place where the copters won't spot it.
-T Hip
Berto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2009, 16:53   #3
LSP972
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Zachary, LA
Posts: 2,530
Nylon brush will be okay. But if you break the integrity of that clear coat, all will go to hell in short order.

.
__________________
"You say you have a "sheepdog" mentality. But if you have no structured training behind you... you're just barking."

"The retard cannot comprehend that everyone else... isn't."
-pangris
LSP972 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2009, 05:12   #4
Chup
Senior Member
 
Chup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: N. Ohio
Posts: 478
I used the lead away cloths by Klean Bore and Flitz Meatal Polish on my 642. Is it the same Finish?
Chup is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2009, 18:52   #5
Berto
woo woo
 
Berto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: WA
Posts: 28,668


Quote:
Originally Posted by Chup View Post
I used the lead away cloths by Klean Bore and Flitz Meatal Polish on my 642. Is it the same Finish?
That's fine on the 642/442, they are alloy framed, but matte blued or stainless steel cylinders.
The Titainium cylindered guns have a protective coat on them as Ti is sensitive to flame/heat corrosion vs steel, and you have to be careful not to use heavy abrasives on them.
__________________
...Then I found a place it's dark and it's rotted
it's a cool, sweet kinda-place where the copters won't spot it.
-T Hip
Berto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2009, 22:57   #6
Ganesh
Okie 4 Life
 
Ganesh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Bradenton, FL.
Posts: 773
Na, the M&P line of .357 J frames use the same DLC coated Scandium frames but instead of a titanium cylinder, they come with a DLC coated stainless steel cylinder. Which puts them about 2 ounces heavier than their PD brothers, but to me, I like that cuz it cuts out the "shoot no less than 120 grain bullets" warning. cuts down on my limitations. Kind of why i went with the M&P over say...a .38 airweight. I can choose any weight and two calibers.
__________________
S&W 340 M&P
Glock 7(still searching)
Glock Carbine(holding breath)
Glock 18(still in my dreams)
Ganesh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2009, 19:44   #7
Berto
woo woo
 
Berto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: WA
Posts: 28,668


Quote:
Originally Posted by Ganesh View Post
Na, the M&P line of .357 J frames use the same DLC coated Scandium frames but instead of a titanium cylinder, they come with a DLC coated stainless steel cylinder. Which puts them about 2 ounces heavier than their PD brothers, but to me, I like that cuz it cuts out the "shoot no less than 120 grain bullets" warning. cuts down on my limitations. Kind of why i went with the M&P over say...a .38 airweight. I can choose any weight and two calibers.

Ah...that's good. I like the Ti cylinder in my 242, but definitely like steel better.
__________________
...Then I found a place it's dark and it's rotted
it's a cool, sweet kinda-place where the copters won't spot it.
-T Hip
Berto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-24-2009, 07:42   #8
fowler
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: ohio
Posts: 3,830
I did not like my 3340 or the metal in the cyl. which consumes itself while you shoot it and clean it. What was SW thinking or not???
fowler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2009, 16:49   #9
den888
Senior Member
 
den888's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 5,062
Lead away cloths work the best.
den888 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2010, 20:02   #10
Ganesh
Okie 4 Life
 
Ganesh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Bradenton, FL.
Posts: 773
Quote:
Originally Posted by fowler View Post
I did not like my 3340 or the metal in the cyl. which consumes itself while you shoot it and clean it. What was SW thinking or not???
Are you meanin the titanium in the PD models? If so, it was a good savings in weight. But I too would rather have a metal that takes more abuse. Kinda why i went with the M&P model.
__________________
S&W 340 M&P
Glock 7(still searching)
Glock Carbine(holding breath)
Glock 18(still in my dreams)
Ganesh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2010, 14:41   #11
ar15ed
Senior Member
 
ar15ed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: nc
Posts: 279
i have had a 340pd for a few years. it have determined that the front cylinder area is just gonna slowly darken up a little. i think abrasive cleaning is a no-no. it doesn't look like new any more, but man, it is still light!
good luck!
ed
ar15ed is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 17:36.



Homepage
FAQ
Forums
Calendar
Advertise
Gallery
GT Wiki
GT Blogs
Social Groups
Classifieds


Users Currently Online: 1,417
462 Members
955 Guests

Most users ever online: 2,244
Nov 11, 2013 at 11:42