Home Forums Classifieds Blogs Today's Posts Search Social Groups



  
SIGN-UP
Notices

Glock Talk
Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.

 
  
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-13-2010, 09:52   #1
tarmac
Senior Member
 
tarmac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 116
Pistol Grip Buttstock

I have a 12 gauge Remington Express with the 18Ē barrel, Cylinder Bore, and 2 shot magazine extension. Iím thinking of changing the factory synthetic stock for a Speedfeed 4 pistol grip buttstock. Any thoughts on this style stock?

http://www.midwayusa.com/viewProduct...tNumber=935944
tarmac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2010, 10:02   #2
B Coyote
Senior Member
 
B Coyote's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: NW Hoosierland
Posts: 4,793
Those are good stocks, especially if you get the one with the reduced length of pull.

bc
__________________
GLOCK Armorer
IDPA: SOI & SSP Master

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
B Coyote is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2010, 10:48   #3
mixflip
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 6,778
The adjustable LOP sounds great but I have heard personal opinions vary on the speed feed system. One guy said when he went to retrieve the first round, the 2nd round would forcefully fly out on the ground if he was under stress or pumped up full of adrenaline vs his old saddle setup. He also mentioned that his did not have enough spring tension to hold only one in place and it would sometimes fall out as he was loading the 1st shell? I hope that is not a common issue?

Of course this is not the guns fault but more of a training issue I suppose most would say since moving slower would stop this right? But then is it really a speed feed since you need to be cautious and smooth on retrieval or is it just an alternative way to carry 4 rounds of spare ammo?
mixflip is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2010, 12:20   #4
tarmac
Senior Member
 
tarmac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 116
Quote:
Originally Posted by mixflip View Post
The adjustable LOP sounds great but I have heard personal opinions vary on the speed feed system. One guy said when he went to retrieve the first round, the 2nd round would forcefully fly out on the ground if he was under stress or pumped up full of adrenaline vs his old saddle setup. He also mentioned that his did not have enough spring tension to hold only one in place and it would sometimes fall out as he was loading the 1st shell? I hope that is not a common issue?

Of course this is not the guns fault but more of a training issue I suppose most would say since moving slower would stop this right? But then is it really a speed feed since you need to be cautious and smooth on retrieval or is it just an alternative way to carry 4 rounds of spare ammo?

The stock Iím looking at is the standard design not the one that holds extra shells. I have my 870 fitted with a six shell side saddle. I have a link attached to my post showing the one Iím looking at.
tarmac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2010, 12:27   #5
byf43
NRA Life Member
 
byf43's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Southern Maryland
Posts: 13,572
Quote:
Originally Posted by B Coyote View Post
Those are good stocks, especially if you get the one with the reduced length of pull.

bc


Agreed. I believe it's called the Speedfeed IV-S.

I have the Speedfeed III (pistolgripped stock w/shellholders).
It is a nice stock, but, the LOP is a little long, and I'm over 6'-05".
__________________
G21 Gen2; G19 Gen3; G30SF; G23 Gen3; G26 Gen4. GLOCK Certified Armorer

"Live Free. Practice democracy. Make a difference. Love your family and your country." H.N.K. (My Dad) 09/02/1924 - 05/11/2012
byf43 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2010, 12:39   #6
Victoriagotagun
Senior Member
 
Victoriagotagun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: California
Posts: 2,184
They are great stocks. The only complaint I have heard is that the grip feels a little blocky to some but that can be easily changed. I too recommend the IV-S version with shorter LOP.
__________________
~Victoria~

"Glocks are for criminals" -Nick_45
Victoriagotagun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2010, 12:42   #7
tarmac
Senior Member
 
tarmac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 116
Quote:
Originally Posted by B Coyote View Post
Those are good stocks, especially if you get the one with the reduced length of pull.

bc
Did you have any trouble installing the stock? Did to have to use washers?
tarmac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2010, 14:30   #8
David Armstrong
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Lake Charles, LA
Posts: 11,125
IME, the pistol stock reduces the overall usability of the fighting shotgun. It works well in a special tool role, but for general use the standard stock (properly fitted) is better.
David Armstrong is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2010, 14:43   #9
Bill Lumberg
BTF Inventor
 
Bill Lumberg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 7,389
I had the option of just about any kind of stock I wanted. I chose the stock you're looking at. Love it, as noted- make sure you are okay with the pull, because the longest ones are a little long for me. I have one on my issue and my personal shotguns.

Quote:
Originally Posted by tarmac View Post
I have a 12 gauge Remington Express with the 18Ē barrel, Cylinder Bore, and 2 shot magazine extension. Iím thinking of changing the factory synthetic stock for a Speedfeed 4 pistol grip buttstock. Any thoughts on this style stock?

http://www.midwayusa.com/viewProduct...tNumber=935944
__________________
Did someone talk to you about your TPS reports?
Bill Lumberg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2010, 15:22   #10
tarmac
Senior Member
 
tarmac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 116
Is the shorter pull harder to install? Do you need to add washers to the long bolt that holds the stock?
tarmac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2010, 02:37   #11
Streetking
Senior Member
 
Streetking's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Western Missouri
Posts: 374
I understand they do require some fitting with the forend.
Streetking is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2010, 05:07   #12
22highcaps
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Trapped in the PRI
Posts: 965
Quote:
Originally Posted by David Armstrong View Post
IME, the pistol stock reduces the overall usability of the fighting shotgun. It works well in a special tool role, but for general use the standard stock (properly fitted) is better.

I will agree with you in the case of Mossberg shotguns due to their tang safeties and slide release position.

However, in the case of the Remington 870, which is the gun the OP is asking about, I have to disagree. The safety becomes easier to use with a SF IV or SF IV-S stock especially if used with a Vang Comp BHS. I find every aspect of shooting a "fighting shotgun" easier with the IV-S than the conventional stock.

The only time I prefer a conventional shotgun stock on a 870 is for a trap/bird hunting gun.
__________________
Illinois Glockers #8
22highcaps is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2010, 11:13   #13
Puppy
Senior Member
 
Puppy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,349
Quote:
Originally Posted by mixflip View Post
The adjustable LOP sounds great but I have heard personal opinions vary on the speed feed system. One guy said when he went to retrieve the first round, the 2nd round would forcefully fly out on the ground if he was under stress or pumped up full of adrenaline vs his old saddle setup. He also mentioned that his did not have enough spring tension to hold only one in place and it would sometimes fall out as he was loading the 1st shell? I hope that is not a common issue?

Of course this is not the guns fault but more of a training issue I suppose most would say since moving slower would stop this right? But then is it really a speed feed since you need to be cautious and smooth on retrieval or is it just an alternative way to carry 4 rounds of spare ammo?
I think speed feed stock systems are great, much better than side saddles IMHO however you have to be aware that some brands of shells do not have enough of a "lip" around the edge/rim of the crimp for them to reliably catch on. & without a good lip on the rim of the crimp of the shell it'll cause the problems you describe.
Puppy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2010, 12:28   #14
MBG20
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 521
ive got one for sale on ar15.com $75 shipped...
MBG20 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2010, 12:37   #15
David Armstrong
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Lake Charles, LA
Posts: 11,125
Quote:
However, in the case of the Remington 870, which is the gun the OP is asking about, I have to disagree. The safety becomes easier to use with a SF IV or SF IV-S stock especially if used with a Vang Comp BHS. I find every aspect of shooting a "fighting shotgun" easier with the IV-S than the conventional stock.
That may be your personal experience. I tend to reflect on what I have seen over a couple of decades training people to use the shotgun in fighting situations, and that experience has shown the regular design stock works out much better for most situations than does the pistol grip design, be it Mossberg, Remington, Winchester, Beretta, or others. Shortening the LOP does make quite a difference to the good, but the pistol grip does the opposite. YMMV.
David Armstrong is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2010, 18:08   #16
fragout
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 55
Quote:
Originally Posted by David Armstrong View Post
That may be your personal experience. I tend to reflect on what I have seen over a couple of decades training people to use the shotgun in fighting situations, and that experience has shown the regular design stock works out much better for most situations than does the pistol grip design, be it Mossberg, Remington, Winchester, Beretta, or others. Shortening the LOP does make quite a difference to the good, but the pistol grip does the opposite. YMMV.
I disagree totally. Plus the speed feed style stock hasn't been used for decades. I find it much easier to sight up quickly, absorb recoil. If you notice the Army/Marines/Swat/Sar/PJ's/seals, etc.. pretty much all use 870 and Benelli's with speed feed type stocks with shortened pull(mostly because they wear armor). It may be your preference, but not from many operators I've served with. I remember hearing that argument when the Army went from the M14 to M16's.
__________________
U.S. Army 88-97 68W2W1
Operation Just Cause
Operation Desert Shield/Storm
Operation Restore Hope/ Gothic Serpent
fragout is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2010, 20:33   #17
22highcaps
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Trapped in the PRI
Posts: 965
Quote:
Originally Posted by David Armstrong View Post
That may be your personal experience. I tend to reflect on what I have seen over a couple of decades training people to use the shotgun in fighting situations, and that experience has shown the regular design stock works out much better for most situations than does the pistol grip design, be it Mossberg, Remington, Winchester, Beretta, or others. Shortening the LOP does make quite a difference to the good, but the pistol grip does the opposite. YMMV.
What problems did these people you observed typically have on the pistol gripped stocks? Would these same people prefer a conventional stock rifle like an M1A to a pistol gripped stocked AR10?
__________________
Illinois Glockers #8
22highcaps is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2010, 08:08   #18
c5367
Esq.
 
c5367's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Indiana!
Posts: 2,570
Send a message via AIM to c5367
Quote:
Originally Posted by fragout View Post
I disagree totally. Plus the speed feed style stock hasn't been used for decades. I find it much easier to sight up quickly, absorb recoil. If you notice the Army/Marines/Swat/Sar/PJ's/seals, etc.. pretty much all use 870 and Benelli's with speed feed type stocks with shortened pull(mostly because they wear armor). It may be your preference, but not from many operators I've served with. I remember hearing that argument when the Army went from the M14 to M16's.
When I was in the Corps, and in an MOS that used shotguns every day, none of our M590s or M870s had a pistol grip. The first shotgun that did was the Benelli, which was being phased in as I was getting out.

Never even saw an 870 with a pistol grip.
c5367 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2010, 08:15   #19
Ryobi
SummertimeRules
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 2,555
+1. Far prefer the pistol grip.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Lumberg View Post
I had the option of just about any kind of stock I wanted. I chose the stock you're looking at. Love it, as noted- make sure you are okay with the pull, because the longest ones are a little long for me. I have one on my issue and my personal shotguns.
Ryobi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2010, 10:43   #20
David Armstrong
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Lake Charles, LA
Posts: 11,125
Quote:
If you notice the Army/Marines/Swat/Sar/PJ's/seals, etc.. pretty much all use 870 and Benelli's with speed feed type stocks with shortened pull(mostly because they wear armor).
And there is your difference. Short LOP and pistol grips have come about for a specialized CQB role while wearing bulky armor. For general defensive purposes the standard stock works better for most people. Again, reducing LOP often helps, going with a pistol grip rarely helps. The many operators I've worked with tend to have standard style stocks on their personal fighting shotguns.

Last edited by David Armstrong; 02-16-2010 at 10:52..
David Armstrong is offline   Reply With Quote

 
  
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:38.




Homepage
FAQ
Forums
Calendar
Advertise
Gallery
GT Wiki
GT Blogs
Social Groups
Classifieds


Users Currently Online: 911
257 Members
654 Guests

Most users ever online: 2,672
Aug 11, 2014 at 2:31