Originally Posted by blk69stang
But if you can't articulate why you stopped someone, and instead are simply leaning on the "random inspection" crutch, then IMHO you deserve that tort lawsuit for being a lazy slug who does sloppy policework.
that's it in a nutshell.
if you choose not to answer any questions, they use that as an excuse to detain because you're acting "suspicious."
of course, never having been in the NYPD, I don't know anything.. like a "high school dropouts who resented any of their former classmates for attending college."
what's the definition of a straw man argument again?