GlockTalk.com
Home Forums Classifieds Blogs Today's Posts Search Social Groups



  
SIGN-UP
Notices

Glock Talk
Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-30-2012, 11:06   #1
mingaa
Senior Member
 
mingaa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 818
AR BUIS 45 degree mount not aligning

The gun previously had a red dot and sights that co-witnessed through that with a gas block sight in the front. I added the scope and as I had sights I bought 2 identical 45 degree rail mounts assuming the geometry would follow as the front and rear change were identical. Apparently my low scores in math have payed off as the sights do not align and do not have enough adjustment to align. The pic attached shows the setup - it is not a sightline picture but you will see the rear is adjusted right as far as possible. Using a bore sight I have a pretty good idea where they need to be. I'm sure that I'm not the first guy to make this assumption so I posted looking for possible solutions. If there are sight sets made for this application (gas block front at 45 degrees) I'm interested. I can also change out the gas block for a rail height and get a new front sight if that's the answer.

Click the image to open in full size.

Click the image to open in full size.

NOT a sightline shot but look at the rear - I'm out of adjustment and the front is as low as it will go and that is not low enough either
__________________
If we choose, we can live in a world of comforting illusion. Noam Chomsky
mingaa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2012, 11:14   #2
ColdBlooded
Senior Member
 
ColdBlooded's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: South of Austin
Posts: 1,191
Are you sure the gas block rail is the same height as the receiver?
__________________
Because I am a genius I have ascertained that fish have gills.
ColdBlooded is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2012, 11:34   #3
mingaa
Senior Member
 
mingaa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 818
No the gas block is lower than the main rail and the sight set on it was made for that configuration. It worked perfectly when mounted straight up. I bought two identical 45 degree mounts and set that up but the geometry did not follow. Using a bore sight I see that I cannot get to alignment having maxed out front AND rear adjustment.

Click the image to open in full size.
Previous setup - same sights.
__________________
If we choose, we can live in a world of comforting illusion. Noam Chomsky

Last edited by mingaa; 06-30-2012 at 11:36..
mingaa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2012, 13:30   #4
WoodenPlank
Who?
 
WoodenPlank's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NW Florida
Posts: 6,584
I can't see the images from where I am posting.

I assume you are using generic 45 degree offset picatinny adapters with sights that were made to be mounted on standard rails. This configuration will NOT work correctly when dealing with a front rail that is not the same height as the upper receiver rail, regardless of what front sight you use.

You will have to change out the gas block to one that has a rail at the same height as the upper reciever rail, and you will need either a different front sight, or a set of fixed offset sights.

Edit: Ok, home now, and I can see the photos. No way is that going to work, unless you change the gas block to a same-height one.
__________________
Never argue with an idiot. They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.

I contacted my Senators and Representative to voice my opposition to a new "assault weapon" ban. Did you?

Last edited by WoodenPlank; 06-30-2012 at 16:30..
WoodenPlank is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2012, 19:20   #5
Matthew Courtney
CLM Number 285
Instructor #298
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Lake Charles
Posts: 5,776
Quote:
Originally Posted by WoodenPlank View Post
I can't see the images from where I am posting.

I assume you are using generic 45 degree offset picatinny adapters with sights that were made to be mounted on standard rails. This configuration will NOT work correctly when dealing with a front rail that is not the same height as the upper receiver rail, regardless of what front sight you use.

You will have to change out the gas block to one that has a rail at the same height as the upper reciever rail, and you will need either a different front sight, or a set of fixed offset sights.

Edit: Ok, home now, and I can see the photos. No way is that going to work, unless you change the gas block to a same-height one.
Plank, I am a little out of my milieu here, but wouldn't a riser on the gas block that was the same height as the upper reciever rail give him a platform that would work?
__________________
You will never begin in the fight you have planned for. You will begin in the fight the other guy has planned for. Retreat in a manner that leads him into your fight should he press his attack.

www.louisianashooters.com
Matthew Courtney is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2012, 09:16   #6
WoodenPlank
Who?
 
WoodenPlank's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NW Florida
Posts: 6,584
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matthew Courtney View Post
Plank, I am a little out of my milieu here, but wouldn't a riser on the gas block that was the same height as the upper reciever rail give him a platform that would work?
If you could find one, I'm sure it would - assuming it was the correct height. However, I have never seen a riser specifically listed as being meant to act as a spacer for an iron sight like that, though. I'm not sure what actual height riser would be needed, either.
__________________
Never argue with an idiot. They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.

I contacted my Senators and Representative to voice my opposition to a new "assault weapon" ban. Did you?
WoodenPlank is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2012, 11:40   #7
Travclem
Lifetime Membership
Badass Member
 
Travclem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Lubbock/Amarillo, TX
Posts: 6,116
Quote:
Originally Posted by WoodenPlank View Post
I can't see the images from where I am posting.

I assume you are using generic 45 degree offset picatinny adapters with sights that were made to be mounted on standard rails. This configuration will NOT work correctly when dealing with a front rail that is not the same height as the upper receiver rail, regardless of what front sight you use.

You will have to change out the gas block to one that has a rail at the same height as the upper reciever rail, and you will need either a different front sight, or a set of fixed offset sights.

Edit: Ok, home now, and I can see the photos. No way is that going to work, unless you change the gas block to a same-height one.
Probably going to need a new front sight too. The gas block front sights are taller to make up for the shorter rail. When you raise the gas block and put 45s on you'll need a front sight that is the same height as the rear sight. (rail mound front sight)



Outdoor Hub mobile, the outdoor information engine
__________________
Sent from a payphone in a whorehouse in Mexico.
__________________
~RIP Chad
Travclem is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2012, 11:42   #8
WoodenPlank
Who?
 
WoodenPlank's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NW Florida
Posts: 6,584
Quote:
Originally Posted by Travclem View Post
Probably going to need a new front sight too. The gas block front sights are taller to make up for the shorter rail. When you raise the gas block and put 45s on you'll need a front sight that is the same height as the rear sight. (rail mound front sight)



Outdoor Hub mobile, the outdoor information engine
I said that, actually...

Quote:
Originally Posted by WoodenPlank View Post
I can't see the images from where I am posting.

I assume you are using generic 45 degree offset picatinny adapters with sights that were made to be mounted on standard rails. This configuration will NOT work correctly when dealing with a front rail that is not the same height as the upper receiver rail, regardless of what front sight you use.

You will have to change out the gas block to one that has a rail at the same height as the upper reciever rail, and you will need either a different front sight, or a set of fixed offset sights.

Edit: Ok, home now, and I can see the photos. No way is that going to work, unless you change the gas block to a same-height one.
__________________
Never argue with an idiot. They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.

I contacted my Senators and Representative to voice my opposition to a new "assault weapon" ban. Did you?
WoodenPlank is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2012, 13:51   #9
Travclem
Lifetime Membership
Badass Member
 
Travclem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Lubbock/Amarillo, TX
Posts: 6,116
Quote:
Originally Posted by WoodenPlank View Post
I said that, actually...
My bad, it's been a rough morning.


Outdoor Hub mobile, the outdoor information engine
__________________
Sent from a payphone in a whorehouse in Mexico.
__________________
~RIP Chad
Travclem is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2012, 14:37   #10
Gunnut 45/454
Senior Member
 
Gunnut 45/454's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 13,199
I get a laugh out of some of the setups I see. Dedicate it as a scoped rifle ! Forget the irons! Or get QD scope mount and put the irons where they need to be!
__________________
Gunnut45/454-One shot one kill!
Gunnut 45/454 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2012, 15:26   #11
WoodenPlank
Who?
 
WoodenPlank's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NW Florida
Posts: 6,584
Quote:
Originally Posted by Travclem View Post
My bad, it's been a rough morning.


Outdoor Hub mobile, the outdoor information engine
No big deal, just had to give ya a hard time for it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gunnut 45/454 View Post
I get a laugh out of some of the setups I see. Dedicate it as a scoped rifle ! Forget the irons! Or get QD scope mount and put the irons where they need to be!
Even more interesting that it's on a DPMS Sportical and using YHM sights...

Somewhere, brand elitists are crapping themselves.
__________________
Never argue with an idiot. They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.

I contacted my Senators and Representative to voice my opposition to a new "assault weapon" ban. Did you?
WoodenPlank is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2012, 15:48   #12
Foxtrotx1
Senior Member
 
Foxtrotx1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Scottsdale AZ
Posts: 4,013
now that is interesting.
__________________
Tin Foil Free Zone.

Eagle Scout.
Foxtrotx1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2012, 19:39   #13
surf
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,019
I think the "purists" were perhaps too busy chuckling over the original issue with the sights not lining up to really care about any quality of rifle / parts topic.

For the OP, if you are insisting on an offset set up, nothing wrong with that IMO, you might as well go ahead and purchase an inexpensive red dot optic instead of using irons.
surf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2012, 00:29   #14
mvician
Lifetime Membership
Senior Member
 
mvician's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: NW Indiana
Posts: 3,126
Blog Entries: 1
You took this - and this _ and turned them 45*. They won't line up. The 45* mount sits lower on the gasblock than the taller sight did.
__________________
addicted to the AR15 and GLOCK
mvician is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2012, 19:33   #15
infidel66687
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 29
red dot is the answer
__________________
G26 gen 3, G19 gen 2, G22 gen 2.
infidel66687 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:41.



Homepage
FAQ
Forums
Calendar
Advertise
Gallery
GT Wiki
GT Blogs
Social Groups
Classifieds


Users Currently Online: 1,575
725 Members
850 Guests

Most users ever online: 5,723
Apr 16, 2009 at 11:36