Glock Talk Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.
 |
|
08-11-2012, 16:31
|
#1
|
|
NRA Life Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New Jersey...sucks
Posts: 29,482
|
Army general is military's first openly gay flag officer
This is not really a political issue, or an Army issue - more of a social issue thing I guess, so I'm going to try GNG as a forum for it.
Army general is military's first openly gay flag officer
The interesting thing isn't that they made her a general and let her "wife" pin on her stars - that would be in keeping with Army policy . . . if you could make general in your first year.
The interesting part is, she has been in the Army for 26 years. More than 19 years ago, she had to state in writing that she was not a homosexual in order to join and I believe she may have had to lie about it again on her security clearance documents throughout the years. Even during Don't Ask Don't Tell, she was in violation for actually having a girlfriend/wife/whatever she calls her. DADT only stopped them from asking, it remained a UCMJ violation to have sex with a person of the same sex.
So that decided to ignore violations o fthe past - but does that wipe out an entire career of lying to the Army and violating regulations, to make her a general?
If she was straight and had a DUI as a captain, she probably wouldn't even be in the Army right now.
__________________
I deserve to lose a gunfight if I ever take gunfighting advice from James Yeager.
|
|
|
08-11-2012, 16:36
|
#2
|
|
Señor Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: On the road to Shambala
Posts: 1,471
|
Being that she's a gay flag officer, does her car have little rainbow flags on the front fenders when she's driven around?
__________________
Vir rationem suorum gestorum libenter reddit,
sive iustorum sive iniustorum.
Eventus horum non detrectat,
sed cum his cotidie vivit.
|
|
|
');
document.write(' ');
};
//-->
08-11-2012, 16:36
|
#3
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 509
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bren
This is not really a political issue, or an Army issue - more of a social issue thing I guess, so I'm going to try GNG as a forum for it.
Army general is military's first openly gay flag officer
The interesting thing isn't that they made her a general and let her "wife" pin on her stars - that would be in keeping with Army policy . . . if you could make general in your first year.
The interesting part is, she has been in the Army for 26 years. More than 19 years ago, she had to state in writing that she was not a homosexual in order to join and I believe she may have had to lie about it again on her security clearance documents throughout the years. Even during Don't Ask Don't Tell, she was in violation for actually having a girlfriend/wife/whatever she calls her. DADT only stopped them from asking, it remained a UCMJ violation to have sex with a person of the same sex.
So that decided to ignore violations o fthe past - but does that wipe out an entire career of lying to the Army and violating regulations, to make her a general?
If she was straight and had a DUI as a captain, she probably wouldn't even be in the Army right now.
|
It's not like she's lied about her qualifications or having a prior criminal record. She lied under a policy of discrimination that 40 years from now would appear no different than "No colored people" policies do now. She shouldn't have been put in this situation in the first place.
|
|
|
08-11-2012, 17:33
|
#4
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Midwest
Posts: 2,951
|
I know of at least three full bull Colonels who received UCMJ punishment for adultery. One case happened within the last year or so. I don't see any reason she should be given an exemption for her violations. I'm on Bren's side on this one.
|
|
|
08-11-2012, 18:25
|
#5
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Solsbury Hill
Posts: 14,564
|
What would McArthur, Patton, Bradley, Nimitz, Sgt. York and Audie Murphy think of this crap?
|
|
|
08-11-2012, 18:26
|
#6
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 1,760
|
Yet she looks so hetero! Whew...
__________________
-Glock Gen 4 G17/G19
-Sig P226 Navy/Sig 2022/Sig P6/Sig M400
-Walther PPS/Walther PPX
-HK P30
|
|
|
08-11-2012, 18:29
|
#7
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: new england
Posts: 2,573
|
How would you feel if she was Jewish and there was a policy against Jews serving? Then years later the discriminative policy was eliminated. Would you think her hiding her religion was justified?
|
|
|
08-11-2012, 18:30
|
#8
|
|
CLM Number 281
NRA Life Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: US
Posts: 28,067
|
Well,.....she looks like a dude, guess she is on top?
|
|
|
08-11-2012, 18:49
|
#9
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 509
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Caver 60
I know of at least three full bull Colonels who received UCMJ punishment for adultery. One case happened within the last year or so. I don't see any reason she should be given an exemption for her violations. I'm on Bren's side on this one.
|
What's the UCMJ definition of adultery ? Seriously, I've got no idea. Were they married and fooling around ? Or were they unmarried and had a girlfriend ?
Are all UCMJ personnel prohibited by having a relationship with other UCMJ personnel, even if neither is married ?
|
|
|
08-11-2012, 18:53
|
#10
|
|
NRA Member 2008
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Northeast Pa, usa
Posts: 2,516
|
Anyone surprised? Really??
|
|
|
08-11-2012, 18:59
|
#11
|
|
hhhhhhhhmmmmmmm
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: SC
Posts: 1,755
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Restless28
What would McArthur, Patton, Bradley, Nimitz, Sgt. York and Audie Murphy think of this crap?
|
Probably would worry more about the work they do than who they sleep with.
__________________
God and soldiers we adore, in time of danger, not before, let the danger
be safely righted, and God is forgotten and soldiers slighted.
- John Churchill
Duke of Marlborough
|
|
|
08-11-2012, 19:01
|
#12
|
|
Searching ...
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: On the move ... again!
Posts: 1,840
|
Right on the money, Bren.
Just more proof we are in the time of what is right is wrong and what is wrong is right.
Fact: A lying CIC or a lying general, whats the difference? No agency is enforcing the law on criminals and the american people have no power over their leaders to do so anymore.
|
|
|
08-11-2012, 19:08
|
#13
|
|
NRA Life Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 9,097
|
The real question is was she promoted because of her sexuality or in spite of it?
Regardless...promotion party following the ceremony to be held at the "Don't ask don't tell club."
__________________
Big Bird,
“Est Nulla Via Invia Virute”
|
|
|
08-11-2012, 19:16
|
#14
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: NoVA
Posts: 4,154
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bren
The interesting part is, she has been in the Army for 26 years. More than 19 years ago, she had to state in writing that she was not a homosexual in order to join and I believe she may have had to lie about it again on her security clearance documents throughout the years.
|
WOW... just wow...
Did you equate concealing her sexuality prior to DADT to getting tanked and taking the party on the road?
INTERESTING indeed... (your comment)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bren
Even during Don't Ask Don't Tell, she was in violation for actually having a girlfriend/wife/whatever she calls her. DADT only stopped them from asking, it remained a UCMJ violation to have sex with a person of the same sex.
|
Have you not violated Article 125? Because I did routinely...
I guess it's a good thing I'll never be a General.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bren
So that decided to ignore violations o fthe past - but does that wipe out an entire career of lying to the Army and violating regulations, to make her a general?
|
If you were a runaway slave, your record was clean after the Emancipation.
If you were a top performer in service to Nation, serving under a backward policy that was later reversed, your record is similarly clean whether you're a General officer or an E-4 for life.
I'm really surprised by your shameful comment. You should slap the **** out of yourself and edit the OP, IMO.
Last edited by KalashniKEV; 08-11-2012 at 19:18..
|
|
|
08-11-2012, 19:26
|
#15
|
|
Anti-Obama
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Anti-Hillary too.
Posts: 55,679
|
Quote:
|
Army general is military's first openly gay flag officer
|
I see you spelled flag correctly.
And yeah, if she lied to get her security clearance, she needs to be prosecuted. It's a matter of national security, not a sex club.
|
|
|
08-11-2012, 19:27
|
#16
|
|
Yeah, so what?
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Anniston, Alabama
Posts: 11,424
|
I think people are avoiding the REAL issue and dodging what NEEDS TO BE SAID........................
Congratulations on your promotion and thank you for your service General Smith.
__________________
On GT, no one can see your collection of Ed Hardy gear. Thank god you can still post "Open carry would have prevented this", and "don't talk to the police" in every thread so we will know you are an unimaginative ******.
|
|
|
08-11-2012, 19:40
|
#17
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: NoVA
Posts: 4,154
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by zoyter2
Congratulations on your promotion and thank you for your service General Smith. 
|
x1000
This is a historic moment in the history of the United States Army and should be celebrated, but really, congratulations to BG Smith!!
The age of Radical Christian Moralism is over in this country. Our culture has progressed.
No longer do we have THE FIRST AMERICAN FEMALE ASTRONAUT living in shame of her sexuality, and in secret. No longer do we have General Officers living lives of service- contrary to the policies of their organizations.
We can celebrate the WHOLE HERO now... and that's a very good thing!
:salute:
|
|
|
08-11-2012, 19:41
|
#18
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Nashville - Music City
Posts: 817
|
It seems that her work over her career was exceptional to the point that she was promoted again, and again, and again until she was among the highest leaders in our Army.
You've got to remember... In response to a set of discriminatory, unjust and un-American regulations against a large number of their fellow soldiers, the Armed Forces has ignored sexual orientation for decades. They didn't much talk about it. Soldiers did their jobs. Soldiers got promoted according to how well they did their jobs. They even got Congress and Pres. Clinton to codify it with "Don't Ask, Don't Tell", while those unjust regs were heading out the door for good.
Here's the test for government recognition of marriage or equal treatment under the law, or any right of any American: Is this a right of a citizen? Is she a citizen? If yes, and yes, then yes.
Congratulations to General Smith, and to our Army for truly reflecting our citizenry.
__________________
That's all that tyranny is: it's not in a personality; it's a set of circumstances. It's being trapped with your enemy in a limited space– a country or a family– where the balance of power between you is unequal and the weaker one has no recourse.
|
|
|
08-11-2012, 19:46
|
#19
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Robertsville, MO
Posts: 6,513
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bren
This is not really a political issue, or an Army issue - more of a social issue thing I guess, so I'm going to try GNG as a forum for it.
Army general is military's first openly gay flag officer
The interesting thing isn't that they made her a general and let her "wife" pin on her stars - that would be in keeping with Army policy . . . if you could make general in your first year.
The interesting part is, she has been in the Army for 26 years. More than 19 years ago, she had to state in writing that she was not a homosexual in order to join and I believe she may have had to lie about it again on her security clearance documents throughout the years. Even during Don't Ask Don't Tell, she was in violation for actually having a girlfriend/wife/whatever she calls her. DADT only stopped them from asking, it remained a UCMJ violation to have sex with a person of the same sex.
So that decided to ignore violations o fthe past - but does that wipe out an entire career of lying to the Army and violating regulations, to make her a general?
If she was straight and had a DUI as a captain, she probably wouldn't even be in the Army right now.
|
I agree 100%
Having served on active duty in the Reserve Personnel Center, I've seen it time and time again.
For example: back then the Officer regulations stated that if you fail certain career courses you must be discharged. I've seen a female officer fail twice and nothing happened to her. On top of that, I was threatened with disciplinary action of I looked into it further.
__________________
NASM-Certified Personal Trainer
MCSE, DCSE, A+
“The single biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place”. George Bernard Shaw
|
|
|
08-11-2012, 19:52
|
#20
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Indiana
Posts: 2,045
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Restless28
What would McArthur, Patton, Bradley, Nimitz, Sgt. York and Audie Murphy think of this crap?
|
Who cares what a bunch of dead guys think?
|
|
|
08-11-2012, 20:01
|
#21
|
|
non-believer
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Oak Ridge, TN
Posts: 1,835
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by zoyter2
I think people are avoiding the REAL issue and dodging what NEEDS TO BE SAID........................
Congratulations on your promotion and thank you for your service General Smith. 
|
cheers to that
|
|
|
08-11-2012, 20:04
|
#22
|
|
you savvy?
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: in a socialist nation
Posts: 17,938
|
maybe she didnt turn gay until after it was allowed in the military....
__________________
wheres my free phone?
both Obama and the KKK want to disarm black folks.
www.silentscream.org
|
|
|
08-11-2012, 20:41
|
#23
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Lost Angeles
Posts: 2,777
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChuteTheMall
I see you spelled flag correctly.
And yeah, if she lied to get her security clearance, she needs to be prosecuted. It's a matter of national security, not a sex club.

|
And how is her sexuality status a threat to National Security? Because she lied? I lost track of how many times I lied or my fellow soldiers lied to cover up for one of our own when they were underage drinking or did something stupid.
Breaking News: Gays have been serving in the military for longer than we've been alive.
|
|
|
08-11-2012, 20:41
|
#24
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Eglin AFB
Posts: 2,653
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bren
This is not really a political issue, or an Army issue - more of a social issue thing I guess, so I'm going to try GNG as a forum for it.
Army general is military's first openly gay flag officer
The interesting thing isn't that they made her a general and let her "wife" pin on her stars - that would be in keeping with Army policy . . . if you could make general in your first year.
The interesting part is, she has been in the Army for 26 years. More than 19 years ago, she had to state in writing that she was not a homosexual in order to join and I believe she may have had to lie about it again on her security clearance documents throughout the years. Even during Don't Ask Don't Tell, she was in violation for actually having a girlfriend/wife/whatever she calls her. DADT only stopped them from asking, it remained a UCMJ violation to have sex with a person of the same sex.
So that decided to ignore violations o fthe past - but does that wipe out an entire career of lying to the Army and violating regulations, to make her a general?
If she was straight and had a DUI as a captain, she probably wouldn't even be in the Army right now.
|
Just get over it man. It's time to move on from this issue.
__________________
PUTTING WARHEADS ON FOREHEADS...
|
|
|
08-11-2012, 20:45
|
#25
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Georgia
Posts: 15,771
|
ehhh....big deal. Thanks for your service General.
|
|
|
|
Sponsored Links
|
Advertisement
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 21:22.
|
|
|