Home Forums Classifieds GT Store Blogs Today's Posts Search Social Groups


Glock Talk
Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.

Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-23-2012, 22:07   #1
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,164
Total assets and potential of being target of civil suit


A lot of discussion about potential of civil suit after one is cleared of criminal charges in self defense shooting.

From your experience as expert witness, what is the lowest amount of assets possessed by a person sued for a self defense shooting?

I realize you may not always have known the assets of the defendant, but a guess would be of interest to me.

I really can't envision someone with less that $50,000 in total assets being sued. I assume the defendant could use his assets to pay for his defense, so if he lost less than $50,000 available.

Again I realize this is not something where you can provide an exact dollar figure for all circumstances, but some insight would be appreciated. Thanks. Jack
jack76590 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2012, 05:33   #2
Mas Ayoob
Mas Ayoob's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,473
Jack, bereaved survivors of the decedent, if they're motivated by revenge and spite, won't be deterred by a low net worth on the potential defendant's side. If their goal is to ruin you, they achieve that by bankrupting you with legal defense fees as thoroughly as they would by winning a judgment against you. They may also choose to frame your shooting of the burglar, for example, as negligent, so they can go after your homeowner liability insurance.

I don't keep track of defendants' net worth. None of my business.

Mas Ayoob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2012, 15:39   #3
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,164

Thanks for reply. I can understand why you would not have access to the net worth of individuals.

I can understand revenge and spite, however, even that has a price and I wonder if the survivors would pay say $40,000 in legal fees with the HOPE of ruining a guy with only $20,000 in assets.

Sure its a free ride for the survivors, when the potential of victory and potential pay out is sufficient to get a lawyer to take the case on contingency. But for that to happen there has to be the bucks there to justify a lawyer taking the case.

But on GT I read threads by people who I gather are maybe 35 years old or less and have not had a chance to accrue many assets worrying mightly about a civil suit.

Now as an older person, who has been fortunate enough to accrue a few assets, I believe, the concern over a civil suit is very legitimate.

Bottom line is, I believe, that while revenge and spite are powerful motivators, they too are limited by monetary considerations. This is especially true when seeking a lawyer to represent you on contingency.

However, I also believe the highly publicized cases can be judged by a different standard. Specifically, I believe that if George Zimmerman is acquited of criminal charges he will be ruined financially. Al and Jesse will be able to raise enough money to fund a civil suit against Zimmerman even if they have to spend $100 in lawyers fees for every $1 subject to potentially recovery. And many lawyers will view bringing the suit as a way to advertise themselves, so the fees or recovery potential in this instance will not be the major motivation.

Sorry if I have been a bit long winded, but it is a subject that interests me and I think, while an important subject not enough attention has been given to the financially aspects that drive a civil suit. Jack
jack76590 is offline   Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:36.

GT Wiki
GT Blogs
Social Groups
GT Store

Users Currently Online: 734
223 Members
511 Guests

Most users ever online: 4,867
May 19, 2015 at 1:03