[Cavalry Doc]

Originally Posted by G19G20

Are you going to stop blindly accepting whatever Fox News, MSNBC, CNN and the rest of the corporate controlled media spout off and research further? If not, you are just destined to remain a sheep being sheared. I'm sorry if I can't convince you that the CIA is involved in covert operations. Maybe do some research into it and enlighten yourself?

You have already stated that you have been no where worth mentioning, and done nothing worth mentioning, with no experience worth mentioning.

So you are blindly following your own hand picked tinfoil hat wearing propaganda, you have even refused to take the advise of several with foreign policy experience. And you expect to have any cred here? That is amazing.

[Cavalry Doc]

Originally Posted by G19G20

....Remember how you said Paul supporters didn't start the Tea Party? ....

Paul didn't start the "tea party". What a disciple.



The original tea party was at least 5 years before he was born.

[Goaltender66]

Benghazi consulate attack was major blow to CIA intel on Libya

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/24/wo...pagewanted=all

Among the more than two dozen American personnel evacuated from the city after the assault on the American mission and a nearby annex were about a dozen C.I.A. operatives and contractors, who played a crucial role in conducting surveillance and collecting information on an array of armed militant groups in and around the city.

“It’s a catastrophic intelligence loss,” said one American official who has served in Libya and who spoke on the condition of anonymity because the F.B.I. is still investigating the attack. “We got our eyes poked out.”

The C.I.A.’s surveillance targets in Benghazi and eastern Libya include Ansar al-Sharia, a militia that some have blamed for the attack, as well as suspected members of Al Qaeda’s affiliate in North Africa, known as Al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb.

[QNman]

Originally Posted by Goaltender66

Benghazi consulate attack was major blow to CIA intel on Libya

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/24/wo...pagewanted=all

It is obvious that you are not a specific brain type who is acutely aware.

[kirgi08]

Not really,it just told the CIA that they bought the wrong informants.What pisses me of is the lack of "concern".With the turmoil in the region,the DPS shoulda withdrawn ta the EMBASSY,I reckon that is more secure than a consulate.

As ta the folk "invading" US soil,I'da shot anyone that crossed the boarder.'08.

[QNman]

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012...terror-strike/

So... It seems the CIA may have torpedoed the POTUS in an election year. Wait, who's in charge of the CIA again?

Democratic strategist Kirsten Powers said Monday the question now is whether the Obama administration lied or is clueless. She acknowledged neither is a great scenario.

Powers suggested the administration was downplaying the Libya attack because it might undermine the narrative that Al Qaeda is being defeated.

[G19G20]

We're getting closer to the truth!

http://news.yahoo.com/u-had-early-in...230330506.html

Within hours of last month's attacks on U.S. diplomatic facilities in Benghazi, Libya, President Barack Obama's administration received about a dozen intelligence reports suggesting militants connected to al Qaeda were involved, three government sources said.
Despite these reports, in public statements and private meetings, top U.S. officials spent nearly two weeks highlighting intelligence suggesting that the attacks were spontaneous protests against an anti-Muslim film, while playing down the involvement of organized militant groups.
It was not until last Friday that Director of National Intelligence James Clapper's office issued an unusual public statement, which described how the picture that intelligence agencies presented to U.S. policymakers had "evolved" into an acknowledgement that the attacks were "deliberate and organized" and "carried out by extremists." click link

Hmm...make note of who provided the talking points to the politicians and the media.

[happyguy]

Now I'm reading reports that the diplomats in Bengahzi made repeated requests for additional security but they were denied by Washington.

Regards,
Happyguy

[G19G20]

So now it's announced that the original story was bull ****! No protests at all?!? Ha, called it. That whole muslim video protest thing was nonsense.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...&v=hJf6Q_jPrJk


Interesting write-up on the incident:

http://www.globalresearch.ca/libyas-...e-covering-up/

[Cavalry Doc]

Originally Posted by G19G20

So now it's announced that the original story was bull ****! No protests at all?!? Ha, called it. That whole muslim video protest thing was nonsense.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...&v=hJf6Q_jPrJk


Interesting write-up on the incident:

http://www.globalresearch.ca/libyas-...e-covering-up/

Don't take that victory lap while patting yourself on the back just yet. Weren't you floating a CIA led assault or something earlier in the thread?

Where are the credible links that you were right about that?????

[Cavalry Doc]

Originally Posted by G19G20

We're getting closer to the truth!

http://news.yahoo.com/u-had-early-in...230330506.html



Hmm...make note of who provided the talking points to the politicians and the media.

Intel officials told the WH it was a coordinated attack, the WH told the media, and Barry himself told the UN it was due to a low quality YouTube video protest that got a little out of hand spontaneously.

Are those the talking points you are talking about?

[G19G20]

Originally Posted by Cavalry Doc

Don't take that victory lap while patting yourself on the back just yet. Weren't you floating a CIA led assault or something earlier in the thread?

Where are the credible links that you were right about that?????

Looks like I'm on the right track with the sheer propaganda being pushed...it's not rocket science to sniff out the bs. If the gov't said it and the "intel" was provided by the CIA, it's usually bs. Proving it is a whole nother can of worms.

FWIW, I can see the Green Resistance angle being accurate since it's a perfect example of blowback, which I also brought up in this thread.

[G19G20]

Regarding the Benghazi incident, the mass denial begins with basic facts. For example, most people refer to “the US consulate,” when in reality the US site in Benghazi was not an embassy or a consulate, or even a “compound”. It was a collection of villas (that is, a gated community) privately owned by one Mohammad Al Bishari, who was leasing the villas to US State Department personnel.

Well that's interesting. Could be a black site, hence the coverup.

[kirgi08]

[G19G20]

Originally Posted by kirgi08

What an insightful reply! Are you sure you didn't plagarize that from someone else?

[kirgi08]

[happyguy]

State Dept. Confirms: Marines on 9/11/12 Were Protecting U.S. Embassy--in Barbados

http://cnsnews.com/news/article/stat...bassy-barbados

When terrorists attacked the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya, on Sept. 11 of this year and killed the U.S. ambassador and three other Americans, there were no U.S. Marines deployed in Libya to defend U.S. diplomats, diplomatic facilities and classified information and equipment.

However, says the State Department, a Marine Security Detachment was deployed on that day to carry out those duties at the U.S. Embassy in Bridgetown, Barbados.

Valerie Jarrett has more security than a US Diplomat assigned to one of the most dangerous posts on the planet.

Where's Featherlicker when you need her?

Regards,
Happyguy

[G19G20]

Originally Posted by happyguy

http://cnsnews.com/news/article/stat...bassy-barbados



Valerie Jarrett has more security than a US Diplomat assigned to one of the most dangerous posts on the planet.

Where's Featherlicker when you need her?

Regards,
Happyguy

These things happen for a reason. After numerous examples you have to dismiss incompetence as the reason. Id like to know if that site EVER had Marines (if not, it's not a diplomatic site....it's a black site) and if so, when were they removed?

[Cavalry Doc]

Originally Posted by G19G20

Looks like I'm on the right track with the sheer propaganda being pushed...it's not rocket science to sniff out the bs. If the gov't said it and the "intel" was provided by the CIA, it's usually bs. Proving it is a whole nother can of worms.

FWIW, I can see the Green Resistance angle being accurate since it's a perfect example of blowback, which I also brought up in this thread.

Been staying up late with George Noory again I see.

[G19G20]

Originally Posted by G19G20

Well that's interesting. Could be a black site, hence the coverup.

Originally Posted by G19G20

These things happen for a reason. After numerous examples you have to dismiss incompetence as the reason. Id like to know if that site EVER had Marines (if not, it's not a diplomatic site....it's a black site) and if so, when were they removed?

Yep, nailed it.

Benghazi "embassy" is a CIA black site. Confirmed by Fox News.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jTK67...ature=youtu.be

Still sound like tinfoil Cav?

[QNman]

Originally Posted by G19G20

Yep, nailed it.

Benghazi "embassy" is a CIA black site. Confirmed by Fox News.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jTK67...ature=youtu.be

Still sound like tinfoil Cav?

If you expect anyone here to pretend this is what you were talking about, when we can all actually read what you said... Well, stop pretending.

[G19G20]

Originally Posted by QNman

If you expect anyone here to pretend this is what you were talking about, when we can all actually read what you said... Well, stop pretending.

Im trying to keep this story alive. It's a BFD because this is media coverage (with damage control) over the real blowback that occurs from the US govt foreign policy. There's still a lot about this incident that hasn't come out. It's been over a month since it happened and the truth is slowly coming out now and it has a lot to do with the CIA and what happens in response to what they do.

Keep watching this story. Lord knows Im the only one updating on it now here.