Romney will sign an assault weapons ban. - Page 6

G19G20 · 10-11-2012, 18:19

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ruggles

"NEVER FORGET!!!!

Just don't mention that more US soldiers have been killed since 9/11 than all those people killed on 9/11. Smart policy there"

Yeah no sense in punching back when attacked, you might just lose the fight huh? Just ball up in the fetal position and take the beating until it stops....Smart policy there.....

The lunacy of the policy has clearly proven itself 11 years later (twice). Thousands more soldiers killed, untold dead civilians, trillions of dollars spent, yet still fighting with no end in sight.

There's nothing I can say that Clint Eastwood didn't already sum up nicely:

"We didn't ask the Soviets after 10 years how that works out."

countrygun · 10-16-2012, 20:59

OK, who still stands by this one, and who wants to claim Obama is no danger to the Second Amendment?

Ruble Noon · 10-16-2012, 21:07

Quote:

Originally Posted by countrygun

OK, who still stands by this one, and who wants to claim Obama is no danger to the Second Amendment?

Sure he is. Problem is the other guy has already proven that he is also.

wjv · 10-16-2012, 21:08

Quote:

Originally Posted by countrygun

OK, who still stands by this one, and who wants to claim Obama is no danger to the Second Amendment?

I'm sure that when he said that he wanted to reintroduce an AW Ban he was talking about an All Wheat Ban, to help those people who are allergic to wheat. . .

frank4570 · 10-16-2012, 21:14

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ruble Noon

Sure he is. Problem is the other guy has already proven that he is also.

The actual danger seems to be in the supreme court justices. Obama will select *mostly* democrat types. Romney will select *mostly* republican types. Heller was a 5/4 vote. The next vote could go badly for us.

**QNman** · 10-16-2012, 21:14

Quote:

Originally Posted by countrygun

OK, who still stands by this one, and who wants to claim Obama is no danger to the Second Amendment?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ruble Noon

Sure he is. Problem is the other guy has already proven that he is also.

Except he said he wouldn't. Obama said he would. Choose.

**QNman** · 10-16-2012, 21:16

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ruble Noon

Sure he is. Problem is the other guy has already proven that he is also.

I'm with you in principle, my friend. But we have a choice - a) or b). Not "None of the above".

We tried in the primaries for something better. We have what we have.

Choose or spectate.

countrygun · 10-16-2012, 21:19

Not to mention Obama sounded positively enthusiastic about one

**QNman** · 10-16-2012, 21:20

Quote:

Originally Posted by countrygun

Not to mention Obama sounded positively enthusiastic about one

Too bad Romney didn't ask him why he didn't pursue one in the first four...

countrygun · 10-16-2012, 21:22

Quote:

Originally Posted by QNman

Too bad Romney didn't ask him why he didn't pursue one in the first four...

and then tie it to "F&F" as an underhanded attemp to inluence events

concretefuzzynuts · 10-17-2012, 03:40

Quote from Obama, 2nd debate:

“My belief is that, (A), we have to enforce the laws we’ve already got, make sure that we’re keeping guns out of the hands of criminals, those who are mentally ill. We’ve done a much better job in terms of background checks, but we’ve got more to do when it comes to enforcement.

“But I also share your belief that weapons that were designed for soldiers in war theaters don’t belong on our streets. And so what I’m trying to do is to get a broader conversation about how do we reduce the violence generally. Part of it is seeing if we can get an assault weapons ban reintroduced. But part of it is also looking at other sources of the violence. Because frankly, in my home town of Chicago, there’s an awful lot of violence and they’re not using AK-47s. They’re using cheap hand guns.”

ricklee4570 · 10-17-2012, 08:41

Quote:

Originally Posted by concretefuzzynuts

Quote from Obama, 2nd debate:

“My belief is that, (A), we have to enforce the laws we’ve already got, make sure that we’re keeping guns out of the hands of criminals, those who are mentally ill. We’ve done a much better job in terms of background checks, but we’ve got more to do when it comes to enforcement.

“But I also share your belief that weapons that were designed for soldiers in war theaters don’t belong on our streets. And so what I’m trying to do is to get a broader conversation about how do we reduce the violence generally. Part of it is seeing if we can get an assault weapons ban reintroduced. But part of it is also looking at other sources of the violence. Because frankly, in my home town of Chicago, there’s an awful lot of violence and they’re not using AK-47s. They’re using cheap hand guns.”

Yup, thats what he said, He has said similar things at different venues for years, yet we keep hearing about how Obama does not want to take away our guns.

I think Romney made it clear, no new gun laws.

Acujeff · 10-17-2012, 09:14

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ruble Noon

Sure he is. Problem is the other guy has already proven that he is also.

That's not true and it's been covered many times in GT threads.

If you actually examine his record it is clear Romney signed no anti-2A bills while he was Gov. He only reduced gun control, removed gun control language from bills, or signed pro-2A bills into law.

The liberal media and Obama supporters are misrepresenting Romney record. The NRA magazines published a link to Romney‘s actual entire record:

http://www.goal.org/newspages/romney.html

http://www.ammoland.com/2012/10/02/g...#ixzz28AyBR021

Ruble Noon · 10-17-2012, 14:09

Quote:

Originally Posted by Acujeff

That's not true and it's been covered many times in GT threads.

If you actually examine his record it is clear Romney signed no anti-2A bills while he was Gov. He only reduced gun control, removed gun control language from bills, or signed pro-2A bills into law.

The liberal media and Obama supporters are misrepresenting Romney record. The NRA magazines published a link to Romney‘s actual entire record:

http://www.goal.org/newspages/romney.html

http://www.ammoland.com/2012/10/02/g...#ixzz28AyBR021

Dude you are the only one in what is left of the free world that claims Romney is pro gun. As far as this goal that you keep quoting, I've never heard of it. Are you its founding and only member?

countrygun · 10-17-2012, 14:29

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ruble Noon

Dude you are the only one in what is left of the free world that claims Romney is pro gun. As far as this goal that you keep quoting, I've never heard of it. Are you its founding and only member?

and you are the only one who gives a ^&*%.

I would say he is neutral and, based on what he and Obama said last night, romney is the better choice. Nobody else is in the race so....

Ruble Noon · 10-17-2012, 14:32

Quote:

Originally Posted by countrygun

and you are the only one who gives a ^&*%.

I would say he is neutral and, based on what he and Obama said last night, romney is the better choice. Nobody else is in the race so....

People said that romney was the better choice because he promised to end obamacare on day one also. As soon as he got the nomination he started walking that back.

countrygun · 10-17-2012, 14:43

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ruble Noon

People said that romney was the better choice because he promised to end obamacare on day one also. As soon as he got the nomination he started walking that back.

So, you think Obama will end it ,right?

Brilliant!

Ruble Noon · 10-17-2012, 16:09

Quote:

Originally Posted by countrygun

So, you think Obama will end it ,right?

Brilliant!

I don't know where you came up with that. I have been consistent with my assertion that obamacare is here to stay.

Acujeff · 10-17-2012, 17:16

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ruble Noon

Dude you are the only one in what is left of the free world that claims Romney is pro gun. As far as this goal that you keep quoting, I've never heard of it. Are you its founding and only member?

Romney's pro-2A record is well documented, and has been proven in the dozens of threads you have high-jacked on GT.

Have you actually ever read Romney's record or the laws and bills he was involved? I've posted them before and you have never provided an actual documented fact of anything Romney has done that substantiates your false claims he is anti-2A.

Just like Obama and the Democrats, you must figure if you keep saying the same lie over and over someone might believe you. But all you have done is ruin your credibility.

Rooster Rugburn · 10-17-2012, 17:20

no he won't.

ETA: if you go back 4 years, you'll see I told the McCainovics that the first thing Obama, Pelosi, and Reid would do, was NOT a gun ban. They called me about every name in the book, but I was right. I said then Obama will in a second term, but not a first.

I don't think Romney will in a second term.

Glock26z · 10-17-2012, 18:07

Write in Sarah Palin for President and Chuck[Walker Texas Ranger] Norris for Vice President if you have a blank lines on your ballot in 3 weeks. That will make both parties look like you know what. I have said this time before,if you do not like who is running for President,write these two in.

Acujeff · 10-17-2012, 18:34

Quote:

Originally Posted by Glock26z

Write in Sarah Palin for President and Chuck[Walker Texas Ranger] Norris for Vice President if you have a blank lines on your ballot in 3 weeks. That will make both parties look like you know what. I have said this time before,if you do not like who is running for President,write these two in.

How is calling to split the vote to ensure Obama gets a 2nd term and let Obama send the USA to hell to teach Republicans a lesson good for gun owners?

Ruble Noon · 10-17-2012, 18:35

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rooster Rugburn

no he won't.

ETA: if you go back 4 years, you'll see I told the McCainovics that the first thing Obama, Pelosi, and Reid would do, was NOT a gun ban. They called me about every name in the book, but I was right. I said then Obama will in a second term, but not a first.

I don't think Romney will in a second term.

You're probably right, that doesn't make him the stalwart 2nd amendment supporter that some make him out to be however. I also can't find it in me to trust someone that has been on every side of that issue.

This isn't very inspiring either.

Quote:

“Deadly assault weapons have no place in Massachusetts,” Romney said, at a bill signing ceremony with legislators, sportsmen’s groups and gun safety advocates. “These guns are not made for recreation or self-defense. They are instruments of destruction with the sole purpose of hunting down and killing people.”

http://www.ontheissues.org/2012/Mitt...un_Control.htm

**Cavalry Doc** · 10-17-2012, 19:13

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ruble Noon

You're probably right, that doesn't make him the stalwart 2nd amendment supporter that some make him out to be however. I also can't find it in me to trust someone that has been on every side of that issue.

This isn't very inspiring either.

http://www.ontheissues.org/2012/Mitt...un_Control.htm

Romney is far from perfect, very far.

Barry is not an inch away from dismal.

Do what you want, but don't ***** when it happens.

Providence · 10-17-2012, 19:32

Have you guys read the links Acujeff posted? Do you refuse to accept them? The NRA exists to protect the 2nd Amend. Do you think they are lying? Fooled? Confused? Have you not seen how the trolls come on GlockTalk and try to muddy the waters so you doubt yourself. One candidate wants more gun control. One does not. Simple as that.