GlockTalk.com
Home Forums Classifieds Blogs Today's Posts Search Social Groups



  
SIGN-UP
Notices

Glock Talk
Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.

 
  
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-03-2012, 21:06   #1
gofastman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: MN
Posts: 497
I want a new comp, opinions wanted

my LWD comp is quite disappointing, not nearly as much reduction in muzzle flip as I hoped for.

Im trying to decide between the Carver 10 port and the SJC 11 port comp

Im leaning toward the Carver one for no real reason, does anyone have experience with both units?
__________________
You have reached the end of the internet.
Now go outside and play.
gofastman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2012, 21:21   #2
oceanbob
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 347
In my opinion, Comps don't really work that well except to add a blinding flash of burning powder in your eyes when night shooting...

A waste of money. Run your weapon with a normal or extended barrel. No ports or comps needed.


Sure, they look COOL, but that's about it.

JMO
oceanbob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2012, 21:24   #3
gofastman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: MN
Posts: 497
Quote:
Originally Posted by oceanbob View Post
In my opinion, Comps don't really work that well except to add a blinding flash of burning powder in your eyes when night shooting...

A waste of money. Run your weapon with a normal or extended barrel. No ports or comps needed.


Sure, they look COOL, but that's about it.

JMO
compensators work great
I wish all my guns had comps

its just the LWD model is more geared toward recoil reduction rather than muzzle flip reduction
__________________
You have reached the end of the internet.
Now go outside and play.

Last edited by gofastman; 12-03-2012 at 21:25..
gofastman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2012, 11:04   #4
_The_Shadow
Ret. Fireman
 
_The_Shadow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Southeast, LoUiSiAna
Posts: 4,309
The Carver looks to be shorter more compact, but it bleeds a lot off to the sides...
The SJC is longer and doesn't bleed as much energy to the sides till the end of the comp.

Personally I don't use comps, but they are helpful for competition shooters in some situations to keep muzzle clme down. The comps also add more noise near the shooter and bystanders and yes the flash exits those ports too!
__________________
Southeast, LoUiSiAna
NRA Life Member
BASS Life Member
_The_Shadow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2012, 21:55   #5
gofastman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: MN
Posts: 497
Quote:
The Carver looks to be shorter more compact, but it bleeds a lot off to the sides...
The SJC is longer and doesn't bleed as much energy to the sides till the end of the comp.

sounds like the SJC may be more to my liking in this case.

BTW I think the picture in my above link is of their 7 port modle,
this is the 11 port:
The 10 Ring
__________________
You have reached the end of the internet.
Now go outside and play.

Last edited by gofastman; 12-04-2012 at 21:57..
gofastman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2012, 01:10   #6
Any Cal.
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 443
I have the Carver you are looking at, haven't played with the SJC. I think half the issue is the threads they use, I think the SJC uses KKM threads, the Carver uses LW.

Here is a sideways vid of the Carver, shooting some loads that aren't tailored to it. I'll add some more info in a bit.


The loads in the vid are 230s @ 1130ish, loaded w/ Longshot. If they were #9 and a lighter bullet, it would be noticeably flatter. They are pushing back quite a bit, you can see on the last several rounds I get pushed off balance some. My stance wasn't very aggressive, but I was lined up decent behind the gun.

Try not to be blinded by all that flash...

The Jaeger is the same size as the Carver, but uses only holes that face up, FWIW. I think his uses LW threads.

If you are interested in the Carver, I will make you a deal on mine, I don't use it as much since I quit using 10mm brass. Truth be told, I was expecting a larger difference as well, but then, I am not using powders or loads that work the comp very well either. It is a noticeable difference after shooting without it for a while to put it on, the gun shoots a lot faster and with a lot less muzzle rise and torque. For me, the size is the biggest turn-off, I prefer the gun without the extra hanging out the end.

The SJC would probably shoot flatter, since it is longer, has more ports, and is most likely heavier, or at least has more weight hanging out front. To really do it right though, I think you probably need to lighten the slide and your recoil spring, and tailor your loads to the comp and keep them at a fairly low power factor to get anything approaching flat.

I seriously doubt the holes to the side matter much, especially if they aren't in the first port and are smaller, vs. the larger ones on the LW. They aren't doing a whole lot in the first place, so it isn't like they are taking much away from the other ports, and if they weren't there, they would only allow a small amount of extra gas to hit a port farther down the line, which isn't doing that much either.

Some of the gun games forums have a lot of info on comps as well, but it is a lot like asking which powder is best for 10mm, or which barrel, or which gun... :D

Last edited by Any Cal.; 12-05-2012 at 02:21..
Any Cal. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2012, 07:55   #7
G29SFWTF
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 206
I bought a used comp from the classifieds here for a Glock 19. It's sold as a unit with the KKM barrel. It looks like a carver but I don't know if it is. Muzzle flip is noticeably reduced.
G29SFWTF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2012, 20:33   #8
blackgun556
Member
 
blackgun556's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 55
the kkm works just as well as the carver if not better and it is smaller
blackgun556 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2012, 20:19   #9
gofastman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: MN
Posts: 497
Quote:
Originally Posted by blackgun556 View Post
the kkm works just as well as the carver if not better and it is smaller
have you used both?



The SJC comp is out,it threaded in 9/16 32TPI only
__________________
You have reached the end of the internet.
Now go outside and play.
gofastman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2012, 20:33   #10
blackgun556
Member
 
blackgun556's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 55
I have a LW barrel with the carver and the kkm barrel and comp. I like the kkm better. smaller and works better. I have 2 g20 and the one always gets left behind.

http://www.kkmprecision.com/custom_p...&cat=16&page=1
blackgun556 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2012, 21:20   #11
Any Cal.
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 443
Is the kkm the steel one or aluminum? What load do you shoot through them?
Any Cal. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2012, 10:01   #12
ModGlock17
Senior Member
 
ModGlock17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Lalaland USA
Posts: 2,626
Quote:
Originally Posted by Any Cal. View Post
.
.

Try not to be blinded by all that flash...

. ... :D
Hi-cap magazines don't turn out to be all that useful if you're blinded by the flash and BDot powder.


Posted using Outdoor Hub Campfire
ModGlock17 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2012, 16:34   #13
gofastman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: MN
Posts: 497
With the Carver, do you think I could plug up 1 or 2 (pairs) of the side ports with epoxy to get more gas out the top and reduce muzzle flip?
__________________
You have reached the end of the internet.
Now go outside and play.
gofastman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2012, 19:14   #14
ModGlock17
Senior Member
 
ModGlock17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Lalaland USA
Posts: 2,626
Quote:
Originally Posted by gofastman View Post
With the Carver, do you think I could plug up 1 or 2 (pairs) of the side ports with epoxy to get more gas out the top and reduce muzzle flip?
I build my own golf clubs... etc. Club heads are epoxied onto the shafts. To remove them, I heat them up. At Hi-temp, epoxy decomposes to fine dust... Even JB Weld is part epoxy.
ModGlock17 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2012, 20:19   #15
gofastman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: MN
Posts: 497
Quote:
Originally Posted by ModGlock17 View Post
I build my own golf clubs... etc. Club heads are epoxied onto the shafts. To remove them, I heat them up. At Hi-temp, epoxy decomposes to fine dust... Even JB Weld is part epoxy.
How about exhaust system repair cement?
__________________
You have reached the end of the internet.
Now go outside and play.

Last edited by gofastman; 12-07-2012 at 20:20..
gofastman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2012, 20:28   #16
_The_Shadow
Ret. Fireman
 
_The_Shadow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Southeast, LoUiSiAna
Posts: 4,309
Quote:
Originally Posted by gofastman View Post
With the Carver, do you think I could plug up 1 or 2 (pairs) of the side ports with epoxy to get more gas out the top and reduce muzzle flip?

BAD IDEA! plugs could get blown out when unexpected and strike bystatnders!
__________________
Southeast, LoUiSiAna
NRA Life Member
BASS Life Member
_The_Shadow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2012, 22:41   #17
Any Cal.
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 443
Quote:
Originally Posted by gofastman View Post
How about exhaust system repair cement?
I would tap it for machine screws or set-screws and Loc-Tite them in, if I had to block off those wimpy little ports that weren't hurting anything...
Any Cal. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2012, 20:38   #18
gofastman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: MN
Posts: 497
man, this Carver comp is a BIG upgrade from the LWD one!

The thing shoots FLAT! also the brass stays a lot closer, the Carver+ stock spring throws brass as far as the LWD+ ISMI 24lb spring
__________________
You have reached the end of the internet.
Now go outside and play.

Last edited by gofastman; 12-29-2012 at 11:12..
gofastman is offline   Reply With Quote

 
  
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 22:14.




Homepage
FAQ
Forums
Calendar
Advertise
Gallery
GT Wiki
GT Blogs
Social Groups
Classifieds


Users Currently Online: 950
274 Members
676 Guests

Most users ever online: 2,672
Aug 11, 2014 at 2:31