GlockTalk.com
Home Forums Classifieds Blogs Today's Posts Search Social Groups



  
SIGN-UP
Notices

Glock Talk
Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.

 
  
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-24-2012, 13:20   #41
4949shooter
Senior Member
 
4949shooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: New Jersey Republik
Posts: 13,032


Quote:
Originally Posted by Opie 1 Kenopie View Post
4949, that's a friggin' hilarious image. Stuck in a snowbound Alaskan cabin, nothin' but dried out biscuits, some hard deer jerky and... some loose .40 ammo lying around. I got a good chuckle outta that one. You might not be too far off the mark though, Alaska State Troopers carry the G22 so there's bound to be some Short & Weak lying around.
LOL Opie1 I must have too much time on my hands to think this stuff up.
__________________
"...the men under your command deserve your leadership."-OXCOPS
4949shooter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2012, 10:49   #42
ca survivor
Senior Member
 
ca survivor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 7,665
Quote:
Originally Posted by glock_19guy1983 View Post
This. 10mm headspaces on the case mouth, running a 40S&W case in a 10mm chamber means that the extractor is the only thing holding it in.
don't worry, soon will see "my extractor broke"
ca survivor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2012, 10:55   #43
attrapereves
Senior Member
 
attrapereves's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Midwest
Posts: 1,392
I understand that 10mm costs a lot more than 40SW, but if you are only going to shoot 40SW out of a 10mm Glock, why not just buy a 22/23/27?
attrapereves is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2012, 11:34   #44
G29SFWTF
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 206
Speaking for myself I'm not going to shoot .40 exclusively. But until I get around to being a reloader, this gives me a lot more shooting time with this g29 than I otherwise would have. I bought the gun used with a bunch of bells and whistles and I've added a few things too and now I just like shooting it.
G29SFWTF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2012, 16:28   #45
maxmanta
Senior Member
 
maxmanta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: All by myself, sitting on the floor
Posts: 1,526
A quick thought experiment tells me that the extractor is the only thing holding the cartridge against the breech face.

But if it works, do it.
__________________
This is not Haiku.
I'm just counting syllables.
I'll shut up, okay?
maxmanta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2012, 18:03   #46
BruceO
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 99
Quote:
Not true. The case mouth is only a limiting factor. Your 10's still space off the extractor, unless the case is long enough to hit both (about 1.002"). As the slide/breach picks up a round from the mag, it slides up the breach, and under the extractor.
Not hardly.

But, if that's what you believe, precede. The extractor was never designed to hold the case against the breach face although shooting the short cases takes advantage of the extractor to breach dimension relationship. Possibly the manufacturer should just eliminate the final machining of the shoulder in the chamber altogether under the premise that it is unnecessary. I mean, there is no need to regulate case length and the COAL length could be limited by the rifling in the leade.

When I see Glock (or any other manufacturer for that matter) say that it is acceptable to shoot ammunition in any gun for which the gun is not chambered, I'll buy into it. Until then, this is a totally false economy and any body who does this is totally on their own if something bad happens.

Oh, incidentally, the "no reloads" argument doesn't hold any water because the reason for it is totally different.
__________________
Bruce
BruceO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2012, 20:25   #47
dm1906
Retired SO
 
dm1906's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: PRK (Kalifornia)
Posts: 428
Quote:
Originally Posted by BruceO View Post
Not hardly.

But, if that's what you believe, precede. The extractor was never designed to hold the case against the breach face although shooting the short cases takes advantage of the extractor to breach dimension relationship. Possibly the manufacturer should just eliminate the final machining of the shoulder in the chamber altogether under the premise that it is unnecessary. I mean, there is no need to regulate case length and the COAL length could be limited by the rifling in the leade.

When I see Glock (or any other manufacturer for that matter) say that it is acceptable to shoot ammunition in any gun for which the gun is not chambered, I'll buy into it. Until then, this is a totally false economy and any body who does this is totally on their own if something bad happens.

Oh, incidentally, the "no reloads" argument doesn't hold any water because the reason for it is totally different.
Really? Get out your sliderule....

The 10mm CASE length tolerance is MUCH less than what the extractor allows. You cannot chamber a case, within tolerance, and have it forward of the extractor. Therefor, it is behind the extractor, with a space between the case mouth and end of the chamber. If the case fully engaged the chamber, every time, the case head would be spaced away from the breach, every time. This has no relevance to what we are discussing.

If your cases are fully engaging the chamber and the breach, the cases are too long, and out of spec. This has nothing to do with the lede/throat.

If the case head is forward of the extractor, it won't fire. If your pistol fires, the case head is being held, by spring tension, firmly against the breach. If it isn't, your gun is broken, or you've chambered a round other than a 10mm.

Whether or not the extractor was ever designed to do this, isn't relevant. It does it, by design or otherwise.
__________________
Life is tough. It's tougher if you're stupid. -- The Duke
dm1906 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2012, 21:14   #48
Any Cal.
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 443
I have no dog in this fight, but the time I checked the extractor had .030" slop, which let the case mouth be what set headspace between the min and trim to length.
Any Cal. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2012, 16:29   #49
BruceO
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 99
Quote:
I have no dog in this fight, but the time I checked the extractor had .030" slop, which let the case mouth be what set headspace between the min and trim to length.
I haven't checked this dimension to verify it but development of the "trim to length" has zero to do with the design process which determined the breach face to extractor hook length. dm1906 would argue that the tolerances left in order for the extractor to function properly and for ammunition to feed from the magazine to chamber reliably make the shoulder in the chamber irrelevant. Actually, the shoulder is machined the way it is to limit forward motion of the case during the firing sequence. The extractor was not designed for this purpose. Although a byproduct of it's method of operation and may provide some benefit in this area, the intended mechanics of the operation of the pistol does not include the use of the extractor for this. That being the case the manufacturer never designed the extractor with that in mind. dm1906 would propose that there is no minimum case length specification at all as long as favorable dimensional relationships between the extractor hook, case extractor groove and rim and breach face are maintained. The chamber's shoulder is of no particular significance and could and probably should be deleted as obsolete.

I am not of that particular persuasion and must therefore just agree to disagree.
__________________
Bruce

Last edited by BruceO; 09-26-2012 at 16:31..
BruceO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2012, 17:02   #50
copo9560
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 370
I have tried the experiment and had no issues - maybe I was lucky. Better question is does anyone have any documented proof of a G20 blown up by using 40S&W? I can see beating up the extractor but that is easy enough to change. There appear to be a lot of guys trying this - curious if anyone has really had a bad experience.
copo9560 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2012, 20:27   #51
BruceO
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 99
You also erode the shoulder in the chamber, among other things. The only bad things are not just the possibility of a catastrophic failure although that may be sole concern of some.

http://thegunzone.com/10v40.html
__________________
Bruce

Last edited by BruceO; 09-26-2012 at 20:30..
BruceO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2012, 00:23   #52
dm1906
Retired SO
 
dm1906's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: PRK (Kalifornia)
Posts: 428
Quote:
Originally Posted by BruceO View Post
You also erode the shoulder in the chamber, among other things. The only bad things are not just the possibility of a catastrophic failure although that may be sole concern of some.

http://thegunzone.com/10v40.html
Erosion is no more likely than with any other cartridge, correct or not. And the article does not refer to Glock pistols. We've repeated, over and over again, this should not be tried in any other brand pistol. I'm NOT trying to convince anyone to try anything they are not absolutely comfortable with, or that may be unsafe. Only trying to dispel myth and rumor regarding THIS situation. The Glock doesn't know the difference, nor does it care. A .40 round won't fire (any more likely than if it were a 10mm round) if it's isn't properly chambered (either would be equally bad). Other pistols, such as those in the article, may. If the Glock does, it was already broken, or modified in such a way this should never be attempted (such as an extended striker, which is a bad mod, in almost any case).
__________________
Life is tough. It's tougher if you're stupid. -- The Duke
dm1906 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2012, 17:51   #53
BruceO
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 99
Quote:
Erosion is no more likely than with any other cartridge, correct or not. And the article does not refer to Glock pistols.
Yah, right.

It doesn't mention the Glock by name because it's a general statement.

Anyway...................
__________________
Bruce
BruceO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2012, 20:29   #54
Yondering
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 563
It's funny how some people will argue against doing this, despite all logical explanations, without having a clue what they're talking about. If you don't understand why this can be done in a Glock but shouldn't be done in other pistols, fine, but quit acting like you're smarter than the rest of us - you aren't. Open your mind and look at the facts, and quit going off old rumors.

Throat and chamber erosion is no different firing 40 vs 10mm - it's practically non-existent with either round; these aren't magnum rifle rounds with large powder volumes and small bores.
Yondering is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2012, 14:10   #55
Javelin
Silver Membership
Got Glock?
 
Javelin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: N. Dallas
Posts: 14,638


Quote:
Originally Posted by Yondering View Post
It's funny how some people will argue against doing this, despite all logical explanations, without having a clue what they're talking about. If you don't understand why this can be done in a Glock but shouldn't be done in other pistols, fine, but quit acting like you're smarter than the rest of us - you aren't. Open your mind and look at the facts, and quit going off old rumors.

Throat and chamber erosion is no different firing 40 vs 10mm - it's practically non-existent with either round; these aren't magnum rifle rounds with large powder volumes and small bores.
Yeah because that extra 3mm of brass on the 10mm casing and barrel chamber is just there for aesthetics anyway......
__________________
Disclaimer: This writer is not a lawyer. This product is meant for entertainment and fan or political fiction purposes only and writer accepts no liability. All material should be considered as infotainment only. Writer does not own any characters, topics or subject matter in this story. Any resemblance to real persons, living or dead is for entertainment only. If rash, irritation, redness, or swelling develops, discontinue reading immediately and consult your physician.
Javelin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2012, 15:13   #56
dm1906
Retired SO
 
dm1906's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: PRK (Kalifornia)
Posts: 428
Quote:
Originally Posted by BruceO View Post
Yah, right.

It doesn't mention the Glock by name because it's a general statement.

Anyway...................
Right. It is/was a general statement, general to the pistols examined, which didn't include Glock. The reasons for the failures they describe are not characteristic of the function of a Glock pistol. I/we do not recommend this practice in pistols other than Glock for the reasons they describe. Please provide a source describing a Glock failure, under these conditions. If it's happened, it's a big secret.
__________________
Life is tough. It's tougher if you're stupid. -- The Duke
dm1906 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2012, 15:43   #57
Ebb27
Senior Member
 
Ebb27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: East of the mountains
Posts: 2,841
Quote:
Originally Posted by copo9560 View Post
I have tried the experiment and had no issues - maybe I was lucky. Better question is does anyone have any documented proof of a G20 blown up by using 40S&W? I can see beating up the extractor but that is easy enough to change. There appear to be a lot of guys trying this - curious if anyone has really had a bad experience.

Well I know a lot of folks like drama but both rounds are similiar CUP pressure with the 10mm being a bit higher.

So it's not likely you're gonna get some catastrophic failure that causes the pistol to blow-up like a pipe-bomb by using a shorter lower pressure round.


At most you'll damage the extractor, or the round will slip past the extractor and fail to fire.
__________________
A Glock in the hand,
is worth two in the safe.
Ebb27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2012, 11:48   #58
Spring Hill Glocker
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: florida
Posts: 13
Someone make a YouTube video about this maybe moss pawnshop channel will do a special I do know you can buy caliber inserts for a 12 Gauge and shoot 9mm 22lr 357 out of it safely but I can't comment on the accuracy but if it comes down to you finding assorted ammo and only a shot gun these inserts would be a heaven send in a crisis.
Spring Hill Glocker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2012, 11:59   #59
ithaca_deerslayer
Senior Member
 
ithaca_deerslayer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Upstate NY, USA
Posts: 19,711
Cool thread.

Maybe reason enough to buy a 10mm now
ithaca_deerslayer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2013, 09:42   #60
vaquero aleman
"ah-lay-mahn"
 
vaquero aleman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: On the other side of the tracks
Posts: 770
I'll up your ante,

I have a G21, in which I placed a factory G20 6" barrel, and fired some 40 S&W. I use a Wolff guide rod with #20 spring. I shot Underwood 165gr 40 for a few rounds and then tried some Underwood 135gr 40. I threw away the first three rounds, of the 135gr, because they did not ignite. The pin had obviously punched the primer but did not ignite it. The 165gr fired without incident but the 135gr would not fire and I can only assume it was because the extractor could not hold the case against the breech solidly enough. Therefore, I intend to get a 10 to 40 conversion barrel to use in my G21. And I did perform the "KKM" mod to the extractor.

And, I must add, that there is no "why" only "just because".

The 10 Ring

The 10 Ring

The 10 Ring

The 10 Ring

The 10 Ring
__________________
G2930SF, The 21 Club #7663, The 10 Ring #7663, The Bull Dawgs Club #???, US Army Veteran


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.

___________________________________________
Amateur Glock Modification Expert...

Last edited by vaquero aleman; 01-23-2013 at 11:00..
vaquero aleman is online now   Reply With Quote

 
  
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 13:59.




Homepage
FAQ
Forums
Calendar
Advertise
Gallery
GT Wiki
GT Blogs
Social Groups
Classifieds


Users Currently Online: 1,064
285 Members
779 Guests

Most users ever online: 2,672
Aug 11, 2014 at 2:31