Home Forums Classifieds GT Store Blogs Today's Posts Search Social Groups



  
SIGN-UP
Notices

Glock Talk
Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.

 
  
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-07-2013, 14:07   #41
ADK_40GLKr
Senior Member
 
ADK_40GLKr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: RFD NY Adks
Posts: 2,261
Blog Entries: 2
TF - With a 7 round legal limit in any NY mag, my G38 has all the firepower the state allows. ( I just have to be careful I don't get caught before racking that 8th round into the chamber! :-) OOOPS, felonious activity!)

I know, administrative reload, THEN insert a mag with 7 rounds.
__________________
Irresponsible use of alcohol kills many times those killed by guns. And look what happened to PROHIBITION 100 years ago!

Last edited by ADK_40GLKr; 02-07-2013 at 14:10..
ADK_40GLKr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2013, 08:42   #42
SCmasterblaster
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Hartford, Vermont
Posts: 16,498
Quote:
Originally Posted by ADK_40GLKr View Post
TF - With a 7 round legal limit in any NY mag, my G38 has all the firepower the state allows. ( I just have to be careful I don't get caught before racking that 8th round into the chamber! :-) OOOPS, felonious activity!)

I know, administrative reload, THEN insert a mag with 7 rounds.
I will have to avoid NY in the future.
__________________
Gun Ownership Offers Freedom in Many Dimensions
SCmasterblaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2015, 10:37   #43
Dom Pastore
dpast32
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: New England Region, USA
Posts: 65
I guess that some folks just don't understand WHY the .45 GAP caliber & Glock 37 combination was originally conceived & introduced. It was produced to allow L/E agencies to issue a duty pistol in the same relative size as the G17 / G22 series, BUT with the "relative" power of the .45 ACP. ( I say relative, because the .45 GAP runs on par with a standard velocity, non +P .45 ACP, but the GAP's pressure levels equate to a .45 ACP+P. )
So, in a nutshell, it works out like this; An agency wishing to standardize on .45 caliber for duty use, can now do so without a great many of the complaints from their rank & file regarding a too large / too thick grip frame issue weapon. lF the agency and or end user doesn't have an issue with the weapon's frame size, then the .45 GAP caliber makes no sense at all, just go with one of .45 ACP Glock models & never look back. BUT, as we noted, time & time again, the current crop law enforcement applicants tend to come in all shapes & sizes, with all types of hand sizes. If we can just remember why the GAP was initially created, perhaps we will see it for what is was intended to be.

Best, dpast32 ( dpast32@aol.com )

Last edited by Dom Pastore; 01-17-2015 at 10:50..
Dom Pastore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2015, 11:30   #44
gfree
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: GA
Posts: 241
Very good thread. Civility in discussing these 2 .45's Propose for sticky.
gfree is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2015, 12:13   #45
RichardB
Silver Membership
Senior Member
 
RichardB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: NC
Posts: 1,516
Pastore, Thanks for the refresher for the folks who seem to forget the posts they read more than 12 months in the past.
__________________
Richard

“Food for thought is no substitute for the real thing”
RichardB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2015, 14:36   #46
Dom Pastore
dpast32
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: New England Region, USA
Posts: 65
THANK YOU Gentlemen for your very kind comments, they are much appreciated. I have always had trouble understanding why some people just couldn't accept the .45 GAP for what it was, & still is, a viable alternative to a specific problem. The key to the whole GAP question is the word "specific", as in pertaining to a specific issue. The issue in question was; "How can we find a duty pistol that will fire a .45 caliber projectile, with ballistics similar to the .45 ACP, but housed in platform that will carry a decent number of rounds, contained within a pistol that the "average" sized person will find comfortable". Well, I may be somewhat biased, but I think the .45 GAP & Glock 37, 38, & 39 models solved that issue just fine !! Personally, I just love my G38. I do kind of wish it had the slim .45 slide, as in the new G30S, but it is what it is. Now, if Glock would just come out with a Practical / Tactical model in .45 GAP, with the slim G30S type slide, that would be a dream come true.

Best, dpast32
Dom Pastore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2015, 18:36   #47
hunter won
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 245
Glock will most likely develop a 30s slide for the G.A.P. since the company is looking at keeping people interested in that caliber.
The G39 is a great sub compact pistol. I have no problem finding ammo, wish more companies would make the .45 G.A.P.
hunter won is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2015, 20:34   #48
bac1023
Senior Member
 
bac1023's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: PA
Posts: 97,730
Quote:
Originally Posted by hunter won View Post
Glock will most likely develop a 30s slide for the G.A.P. since the company is looking at keeping people interested in that caliber.
The G39 is a great sub compact pistol. I have no problem finding ammo, wish more companies would make the .45 G.A.P.
Yeah, they just don't want to let it rest in piece.

Nobody will ever make another GAP pistol other than Glock, in my opinion. Springfield and Para both did and they dropped them quickly. Its a failed campaign.
__________________
.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
bac1023 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2015, 08:55   #49
brisk21
Senior Member
 
brisk21's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Michigan
Posts: 3,974
.45 GAP is stupid. If you can't handle a .45 ACP size frame, then you can't handle a .45 anyways. Low capacity, hard to find, and expensive ammo. Glocks ego is so big they had to have their own caliber. Solving a problem that didn't exist. Plus, if you really want a little more power in a 9mm size gun, they invented the .40 for that 25 years ago. The GAP will never catch on.
brisk21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2015, 08:04   #50
RichardB
Silver Membership
Senior Member
 
RichardB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: NC
Posts: 1,516
"The 45 Short introduced by Glock seems to be a pretty good idea. If the powder space is there we might as well use it and profit by resulting compactness. I do not intend to rush out and buy a 45 GAP, since I have a couple of very serviceable full−size 45s now. "

Jeff Cooper - Commentaries Volume 13, Number 5.
__________________
Richard

“Food for thought is no substitute for the real thing”

Last edited by RichardB; 01-30-2015 at 08:04..
RichardB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2015, 09:43   #51
attrapereves
Senior Member
 
attrapereves's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Midwest
Posts: 1,874
Quote:
Originally Posted by brisk21 View Post
.45 GAP is stupid. If you can't handle a .45 ACP size frame, then you can't handle a .45 anyways. Low capacity, hard to find, and expensive ammo. Glocks ego is so big they had to have their own caliber. Solving a problem that didn't exist. Plus, if you really want a little more power in a 9mm size gun, they invented the .40 for that 25 years ago. The GAP will never catch on.
My wife can handle a full sized 1911, but cannot handle my non-SF Glock 21. That thing is a brick, even for me. The 45GAP, at the time, was supposed to be a 45 caliber pistol in a smaller frame.

With the gen4 and SF frames, there is less of a difference.
__________________
17, 19, 21, 26, 30SF, 34, 41
attrapereves is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2015, 10:08   #52
brisk21
Senior Member
 
brisk21's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Michigan
Posts: 3,974
Quote:
Originally Posted by attrapereves View Post
My wife can handle a full sized 1911, but cannot handle my non-SF Glock 21. That thing is a brick, even for me. The 45GAP, at the time, was supposed to be a 45 caliber pistol in a smaller frame.

With the gen4 and SF frames, there is less of a difference.
Far less. Plus, go handle an M&P 45 or an HK45. Those guns show there is no need for the GAP. I just feel that if a .45 is too much, a 9mm is the perfect option.
brisk21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2015, 11:33   #53
engineer151515
_______________
 
engineer151515's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 21,648


Quote:
Originally Posted by brisk21 View Post
.45 GAP is stupid. If you can't handle a .45 ACP size frame, then you can't handle a .45 anyways. Low capacity, hard to find, and expensive ammo. Glocks ego is so big they had to have their own caliber. Solving a problem that didn't exist. Plus, if you really want a little more power in a 9mm size gun, they invented the .40 for that 25 years ago. The GAP will never catch on.
Your post is so full of misinformation, it is amusing.

BTW - a 1911 frame is even slimmer than a G37. Per your logic I guess 1911 shooters should give up on handling 45ACP too.
__________________
"...dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal." - Abraham Lincoln, Gettysburg Address
engineer151515 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2015, 11:36   #54
engineer151515
_______________
 
engineer151515's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 21,648


Quote:
Originally Posted by bac1023 View Post
Yeah, they just don't want to let it rest in piece.

Nobody will ever make another GAP pistol other than Glock, in my opinion. Springfield and Para both did and they dropped them quickly. Its a failed campaign.
When there's a need for a more compact .45 round, GAP will fill it. You say its a failed campaign. I suspect, it is ahead of it's time. We'll see.

Current designs accommodate the dead air space in standard load .45ACP without consequence. Except, of course, when you get into subcompact 1911 territory. ACP is still a bit troublesome there and can really use the shorter bullet.
__________________
"...dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal." - Abraham Lincoln, Gettysburg Address
engineer151515 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2015, 15:35   #55
attrapereves
Senior Member
 
attrapereves's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Midwest
Posts: 1,874
Quote:
Originally Posted by brisk21 View Post
Far less. Plus, go handle an M&P 45 or an HK45. Those guns show there is no need for the GAP. I just feel that if a .45 is too much, a 9mm is the perfect option.
Those pistols also hold 3 rounds fewer than the fatter Glock 21.

To turn around your argument, why would I buy an M&P45 or HK45 when I could buy a thinner Glock 37 that holds the same amount of ammo.

The M&P and HK definitely aren't as fat as the Glock 21, but the 9mm and 45GAP (even though I've never held one) Glocks will feel better than the M&P or HK.

I don't own any GAP pistols, but I've always said that the GAP is the round that 45ACP should have been. Unfortunately modern powder was not out when the ACP was released.
__________________
17, 19, 21, 26, 30SF, 34, 41

Last edited by attrapereves; 01-30-2015 at 15:36..
attrapereves is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2015, 11:46   #56
SCmasterblaster
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Hartford, Vermont
Posts: 16,498
Quote:
Originally Posted by attrapereves View Post
Those pistols also hold 3 rounds fewer than the fatter Glock 21.

To turn around your argument, why would I buy an M&P45 or HK45 when I could buy a thinner Glock 37 that holds the same amount of ammo.

The M&P and HK definitely aren't as fat as the Glock 21, but the 9mm and 45GAP (even though I've never held one) Glocks will feel better than the M&P or HK.

I don't own any GAP pistols, but I've always said that the GAP is the round that 45ACP should have been. Unfortunately modern powder was not out when the ACP was released.
The .45ACP was invented in a completely different era, long before Glocks were invented.
__________________
Gun Ownership Offers Freedom in Many Dimensions
SCmasterblaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2015, 14:31   #57
RichardB
Silver Membership
Senior Member
 
RichardB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: NC
Posts: 1,516
Yes, and modern powders mean they need less powder: ergo a shorter cartridge, fitting in a smaller gun, the 45GAP.
__________________
Richard

“Food for thought is no substitute for the real thing”
RichardB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2015, 14:39   #58
SCmasterblaster
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Hartford, Vermont
Posts: 16,498
Glock will one day drop the .45 GAP.
__________________
Gun Ownership Offers Freedom in Many Dimensions
SCmasterblaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2015, 15:31   #59
attrapereves
Senior Member
 
attrapereves's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Midwest
Posts: 1,874
Quote:
Originally Posted by SCmasterblaster View Post
Glock will one day drop the .45 GAP.
I would assume that they will as well. It might end up like the 357SIG M&Ps. Only available to law enforcement.
__________________
17, 19, 21, 26, 30SF, 34, 41
attrapereves is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2015, 19:53   #60
Big Bird
NRA Life Member
 
Big Bird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 11,044
Quote:
Originally Posted by SCmasterblaster View Post
They must be deep-seated in order to keep the OAL short enough.

No they seat in the case the same depth as a .45 ACP..

The case is just shorter.

In .45 caliber handguns case capacity is not an issue. Most ACP loads leave a ton of unused case capacity and in my brief experience loading the GAP with 230 grain pills I still had excess case capacity. (You can also use .45 ACP dies to load GAP ammo.)


The GAP matches the performance of an ACP in every bullet weight. As mentioned, its rationale for development lie in the fact that you build a Glock with a G17 frame to work with the GAP and a ACP requires the much bigger G21 frame. The slides on the Glock GAP pistols are also very slightly wider to deal with the larger barrel diameter etc.
__________________
Big Bird,

“Est Nulla Via Invia Virute”

Last edited by Big Bird; 02-09-2015 at 19:54..
Big Bird is offline   Reply With Quote

 
  
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 21:15.




Homepage
FAQ
Forums
Calendar
Advertise
Gallery
GT Wiki
GT Blogs
Social Groups
Classifieds
GT Store


Users Currently Online: 1,490
397 Members
1,093 Guests

Most users ever online: 2,672
Aug 11, 2014 at 2:31