Home Forums Classifieds Blogs Today's Posts Search Social Groups



  
SIGN-UP
Notices

Glock Talk
Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.

 
  
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-08-2013, 19:05   #21
countrygun
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 17,068
I dislike an ambi greatly. Dragging through the "pucker brush and finding the safety disengaged itself is not nice. I didn't like it. With proper handling and the grip safety I wouldn't worry about safety, per say, but what about the hesitation when you try to wipe the safety off and get no tactile feedback? You might try a couple of times before realizing what happened. Not something I want to do when I need pistol in a hurry.

I never had a standard safety, with a positive "click" do that.
countrygun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2013, 08:25   #22
mnhogrider
Senior Member
 
mnhogrider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 825
My Springfield Loaded came with extended ambi safeties. I'm not left handed and I didn't like looking down the gun at "wings" so I got rid of them. Replaced with a standard GI safety.
mnhogrider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2013, 11:11   #23
Nakanokalronin
JMB & MTK
 
Nakanokalronin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 3,358
Single sided and extended since I shoot thumbs forward and ride my thumb on the lever.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.



To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
Nakanokalronin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2013, 11:18   #24
rebby
GT Sponsor
 
rebby's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Anoka Co, MN
Posts: 505
I shoot ambi but HATE ambi-safeties. I outfit the majority of my guns with either Wilson Combat or Ed Brown single sided safeties and simply train to manipulate them with the trigger finger of my left hand when shooting lefty. It's really not that difficult and, if you train and practice, it becomes second nature.
__________________
Curt Rebelein, Junior

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.

NRA Life Member

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
rebby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2013, 11:20   #25
jakebrake
cracker
 
jakebrake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: too close to philly
Posts: 7,915
i don't like ambi. i grew up with 1911s, and never had one until a couple years ago, and hated it so much i sold the gun.
__________________
God made man, Sam Colt made us equal, John Moses Browning made us civilized... freemasons club Number 57
jakebrake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2013, 02:15   #26
skeeter7
Brass Vulture
 
skeeter7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 6,830
I took the ambi safety off of my EMP as well just because it didn't seem right carrying with it. I was afraid the safety would snag on something and disengage when I didn't want it to. I swapped it out with an Ed Brown single sided tactical safety. All good.
__________________
NECC #401
skeeter7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2013, 02:48   #27
PhotoFeller
Senior Member
 
PhotoFeller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Midwest and south
Posts: 2,798
Blog Entries: 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by okie View Post
I also dislike the ambi safety, and I carry cocked and locked with a round chambered, because it is 100% safe to do
Ok, now I see you carry "locked".

Last edited by PhotoFeller; 02-12-2013 at 09:09..
PhotoFeller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2013, 08:57   #28
banger
Senior Member
 
banger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Where evil lives
Posts: 1,379
Quote:
Originally Posted by PhotoFeller View Post
Condition 0?
No, actually a chambered round, cocked hammer and thumb safety applied is known as condition 1 (one).

Very safe if you are familiar with the system, and the way that many professional carry the 1911.

Condition zero is considered a empty chamber hammer down carry.

Those that use it frequently state a preference to "sling shot" the slide if needed.

Last edited by banger; 02-12-2013 at 09:00..
banger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2013, 09:33   #29
PhotoFeller
Senior Member
 
PhotoFeller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Midwest and south
Posts: 2,798
Blog Entries: 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by banger View Post
No, actually a chambered round, cocked hammer and thumb safety applied is known as condition 1 (one).

Very safe if you are familiar with the system, and the way that many professional carry the 1911.

Condition zero is considered a empty chamber hammer down carry.

Those that use it frequently state a preference to "sling shot" the slide if needed.
I re-read Okie's post and realized he said "cocked and locked".

I asked my question because there is confusion sometimes when we talk about carry mode with the 1911 platform as compared to Glock pistols.

The traditional definitions from Cooper are:

Cooper favored the Colt M1911 and its variants. There are several conditions of readiness in which such a weapon can be carried. Cooper promulgated most of the following terms:
Condition Four: Chamber empty, no magazine, hammer down.
Condition Three: Chamber empty, full magazine in place, hammer down.
Condition Two: A round chambered, full magazine in place, hammer down.
Condition One: A round chambered, full magazine in place, hammer cocked, safety on.
Condition Zero: A round chambered, full magazine in place, hammer cocked, safety off.

No one in this thread practices C-0, and C-1 seems to be the preferred carry mode. This is contrary to the common carry mode for Glocks, which is a chambered round with no manual safety.

Last edited by PhotoFeller; 02-12-2013 at 09:45..
PhotoFeller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2013, 09:54   #30
banger
Senior Member
 
banger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Where evil lives
Posts: 1,379
Quote:
Originally Posted by PhotoFeller View Post
I re-read Okie's post and realized he said "cocked and locked".

I asked my question because there is confusion sometimes when we talk about carry mode with the 1911 platform as compared to Glock pistols.

The traditional definitions from Cooper are:

Cooper favored the Colt M1911 and its variants. There are several conditions of readiness in which such a weapon can be carried. Cooper promulgated most of the following terms:
Condition Four: Chamber empty, no magazine, hammer down.
Condition Three: Chamber empty, full magazine in place, hammer down.
Condition Two: A round chambered, full magazine in place, hammer down.
Condition One: A round chambered, full magazine in place, hammer cocked, safety on.
Condition Zero: A round chambered, full magazine in place, hammer cocked, safety off.

No one in this thread practices C-0, so C-1 seems to be the preferred carry mode. This is contrary to the common carry mode for Glocks, which is a chambered round with no manual safety.
Truthfully, all of these names for the condition are simply at the mercy of the imagination of the author.

One author will call it one thing and another, something else entirely.

Sometimes names simply take on a life of their own and become accepted on a wide basis.

Think "Kleenex'", "Clorox", "Frigidaire" names that have become nearly universally accepted and understood by a wide range of the population.

Unfortunately, shooting is not as widely spoken about, so at times confusion prevails.
banger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2013, 11:25   #31
1canvas
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: ne ohio
Posts: 2,423
for me I like the single side, slim and extended. that saftey is close to my side and protected. the ambi saftey is facing out which increases the risk of getting bumped off.
__________________
Member - Armed Citizens Legal Defense Network
1canvas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2013, 22:17   #32
Wyoming
Senior Member
 
Wyoming's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Southwest Wyoming
Posts: 1,987
Send a message via Yahoo to Wyoming
"No one in this thread practices C-0, and C-1 seems to be the preferred carry mode. This is contrary to the common carry mode for Glocks, which is a chambered round with no manual safety."

Actually C-1 is what Okie was referring to. I also carry my 1911 with a round in the camber with the safety on and a full magazine. The safety on the 1911 blocks the hammer. However I need the ambi safety because I am left handed.

The Glock DOES have a manual safety. It is in/on the trigger. When you pull the trigger you are moving the safety off just before you engage the trigger.
__________________
Wyoming
Wyoming is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2013, 22:44   #33
Zombie Steve
Decap Pin Killa
 
Zombie Steve's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Old Colorado City
Posts: 19,935
I don't care for an ambi safety. Just unnecessary for me. I do like an extended safety / ride my thumb on it when I shoot.
Zombie Steve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2013, 02:54   #34
PhotoFeller
Senior Member
 
PhotoFeller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Midwest and south
Posts: 2,798
Blog Entries: 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wyoming View Post
"No one in this thread practices C-0, and C-1 seems to be the preferred carry mode. This is contrary to the common carry mode for Glocks, which is a chambered round with no manual safety."

Actually C-1 is what Okie was referring to. I also carry my 1911 with a round in the camber with the safety on and a full magazine. The safety on the 1911 blocks the hammer. However I need the ambi safety because I am left handed.

The Glock DOES have a manual safety. It is in/on the trigger. When you pull the trigger you are moving the safety off just before you engage the trigger.
Thanks. I corrected my post after re-reading Okie's statement.

My 1911s have single side safety. The ambi setup just seems like unnecessary hardware, at least for me.

I really like the 1911 style manual safety, and I wish Glock provided that option. The Glock trigger 'safety', which disengages when the trigger is depressed, doesn't stop the trigger from being inadvertently pulled. The 1911 safety does prevent the gun from being accidentally fired; thats why I like it and thats why 1911 owners want it. Thats why I'd like it on my Glocks.

Last edited by PhotoFeller; 02-13-2013 at 03:03..
PhotoFeller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2013, 11:51   #35
fnfalman
Chicks Dig It
 
fnfalman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: California & New Mexico, US
Posts: 56,468


Mickey Spillane's Mike Hammer preferred Condition 0.
__________________
Can you dig it?

Last edited by fnfalman; 02-13-2013 at 11:51..
fnfalman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2013, 21:46   #36
Wyoming
Senior Member
 
Wyoming's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Southwest Wyoming
Posts: 1,987
Send a message via Yahoo to Wyoming
Quote:
Originally Posted by fnfalman View Post
Mickey Spillane's Mike Hammer preferred Condition 0.
"Scooter"

Mike Hammer isn't a real person so carrying a 1911 with a live round under the hammer with the safety off does not count because no real person can get hurt. I think they call it "literary license" to be stupid.
__________________
Wyoming
Wyoming is offline   Reply With Quote

 
  
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 21:38.




Homepage
FAQ
Forums
Calendar
Advertise
Gallery
GT Wiki
GT Blogs
Social Groups
Classifieds


Users Currently Online: 1,127
329 Members
798 Guests

Most users ever online: 2,672
Aug 11, 2014 at 2:31