Home Forums Classifieds Blogs Today's Posts Search Social Groups



  
SIGN-UP
Notices

Glock Talk
Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.

 
  
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-21-2013, 21:50   #1
Slug71
Senior Member
 
Slug71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Oregon - U.S.A
Posts: 4,420
Guy LOSES it on MSNBC

Probably the best thing I've seen from there in .....maybe ever.

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?v=164712160404061
__________________
GSSF Member
Bull Dawgs Club #571
Rimfire Club #571
Slug71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2013, 22:14   #2
Chronos
Senior Member
 
Chronos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 3,962
Hasn't he heard? Interest rates will never, ever rise again to their historical averages -- that means we can borrow forever!!!
__________________
If you've already accepted that "violence against the innocent" is a morally legitimate means of funding the government, who are you to complain when the majority apprporiates your legacy and sells your children into a lifetime of debt slavery?
Chronos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2013, 22:49   #3
Slug71
Senior Member
 
Slug71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Oregon - U.S.A
Posts: 4,420
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chronos View Post
Hasn't he heard? Interest rates will never, ever rise again to their historical averages -- that means we can borrow forever!!!
Lol.
I bet a few liberals have quite the headache now after seeing this on their beloved media. More confused than ever.
__________________
GSSF Member
Bull Dawgs Club #571
Rimfire Club #571
Slug71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2013, 23:03   #4
Spymaster
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Northern Wisconsin
Posts: 879
They know what the issues are, they don't care!
Spymaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2013, 23:17   #5
Gunnut 45/454
Senior Member
 
Gunnut 45/454's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 14,048
Wow! Talk about talking in circles? Basically he wants Obummer to assume the dictator role! Go full retard Socialist. As POTUS he can't create the Infrastucture bank. Congress would have to approve it. Cause he would be circumventing the IRS and bring the rapat money in untaxed. Like we'd trust that criminal with all that money unchecked! Not!
__________________
Gunnut45/454-One shot one kill!

Last edited by Gunnut 45/454; 10-21-2013 at 23:18..
Gunnut 45/454 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2013, 01:25   #6
aircarver
Silver Membership
Ride Continues
 
aircarver's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Ft. Worth TX
Posts: 25,103


For starters, he ain't your 'president' ....

... he's a communist who wants to destroy the U S as we knew it.



.
__________________
They'd created a vast, permanently unemployed underclass, dependent upon the Republic's stupendous welfare machine for its very existence, and in so doing, they'd sown the seeds of their own destruction. No one could place two-thirds of a world's population on the Dole and keep them there forever without the entire system crashing . . . but how in hell did one get them off the Dole? -David Weber, Flag in Exile
aircarver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2013, 04:40   #7
czsmithGT
Senior Member
 
czsmithGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 10,092
That must have been an old clip. Ratigan was fired and replaced by that nitwit Martin Bashir in June 2012.

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2012...host-at-msnbc/
czsmithGT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2013, 05:14   #8
JBnTX
JB in Tx
 
JBnTX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 14,715
deleted

Last edited by JBnTX; 10-22-2013 at 05:17..
JBnTX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2013, 05:25   #9
callihan_44
INFIDEL
 
callihan_44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Flyover,USA
Posts: 2,486
im not sure if he is advocating obama go full dictator or what, but i agree about the corruption... the parties care more about retaining power than doing the right thing. Im sorry but amnesty-and obamacare is NOT the right thing for this country.
callihan_44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2013, 07:42   #10
series1811
CLM Number
Enforcerator.
 
series1811's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Retired, but not expired.
Posts: 14,311
I think this guy just came to the realization that a lot of thinking people have finally come to. That our political system is so broken, that it is incapable of repairing itself, or of being repaired by the voters.

So now what?
__________________
I sure miss the country I grew up in.
series1811 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2013, 08:15   #11
railfancwb
Senior Member
 
railfancwb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Shelbyville, Tennessee TN
Posts: 4,205
For a start, the myth that democracy is the best form of government needs to be exposed to the light of day. The idea that one person (the eighth voter out of fifteen otherwise equally divided people) should decide for all fifteen is ludicrous.

As Mr Heinlein put it:

Democracy is based on the assumption that a million men are wiser than one man. How’s that again? I missed something.

Autocracy is based on the assumption that one man is wiser than a million men. Let’s play that over again, too. Who decides?


Posted using Outdoor Hub Campfire
__________________
"Never give to your friend any power that your enemy may some day inherit." -- Paul Weyrich
railfancwb is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2013, 08:59   #12
TheJ
Lifetime Membership
NRA Life Member
 
TheJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: GA
Posts: 1,492
Blog Entries: 3
I simply do not buy the whole "congress is bought" line. Surely money as an impact but the truth is that financial resources are NOT nearly as easy to convert into political resources as most people believe. And this is proven over and over again.

If it was then Kerry would have beaten George Bush, Romney would have beaten Obama and the NRA might as well fold up shop becasue Bloomberg alone is worth many many billions and could very easily outspend the NRA without blinking.

Oh, and for a very recent example the recall elections in CO where the DNC, Bloomberg and other antigun folks out spent the pro gun side TEN times and both incumbent anti-gun politicians still lost.
__________________
Jay

The test of a first rate intelligence is the ability to hold two opposed ideas in the mind at the same time, and still retain the ability to function. -F. Scott Fitzgerald

Last edited by TheJ; 10-22-2013 at 09:11..
TheJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2013, 09:13   #13
Gundude
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 6,972
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheJ View Post
I simply do not buy the whole "congress is bought" line. Surely money as an impact but the truth is that financial resources are NOT nearly as easy to convert into political resources as most people believe. And this is proven over and over again.

If it was then Kerry would have beaten George Bush, Romney would have beaten Obama and the NRA might as well fold up shop becasue Bloomberg alone is worth many many billions and could very easily outspend the NRA without blinking.

Oh, and for a very recent example the recall elections in CO where the DNC, Bloomberg and other antigun folks out spent the pro gun side TEN times and both incumbent anti-gun politicians still lost.
Maybe, but it's the conversion of political resources to financial that's more of a problem. Once the politicians are elected, they're using their political resources to enrich themselves (by making law based not on what their constituents want nor what's good for their district or the country, but instead based on what those paying them want). They are being bought. That was the guy's point. Not that they're buying their office, but that they themselves are being bought by others.

Last edited by Gundude; 10-22-2013 at 09:17..
Gundude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2013, 09:23   #14
TheJ
Lifetime Membership
NRA Life Member
 
TheJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: GA
Posts: 1,492
Blog Entries: 3
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gundude View Post
Maybe, but it's the conversion of political resources to financial that's more of a problem. Once the politicians are elected, they're using their political resources to enrich themselves (by making law based not on what their constituents want nor what's good for their district or the country, but instead based on what those paying them want). They are being bought. That was the guy's point. Not that they're buying their office, but that they themselves are being bought by others.
I still don't think it is anywhere near as many claim.

You hear the claims all the time about the reason "common sense" gun control can't get through congress is because the NRA a "owns" so many.. Those (and many claims just like it) are obviously verifiably false. As I pointed out, the antigun side has VASTLY greater financial resources. It's not even close when it comes to financial resources.. Yet the NRA has as much power as it does because of a myriad of other reasons not the least of which is real influence over how people actually vote.
__________________
Jay

The test of a first rate intelligence is the ability to hold two opposed ideas in the mind at the same time, and still retain the ability to function. -F. Scott Fitzgerald

Last edited by TheJ; 10-22-2013 at 09:58..
TheJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2013, 12:14   #15
series1811
CLM Number
Enforcerator.
 
series1811's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Retired, but not expired.
Posts: 14,311
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheJ View Post
I simply do not buy the whole "congress is bought" line. Surely money as an impact but the truth is that financial resources are NOT nearly as easy to convert into political resources as most people believe. And this is proven over and over again.

If it was then Kerry would have beaten George Bush, Romney would have beaten Obama and the NRA might as well fold up shop becasue Bloomberg alone is worth many many billions and could very easily outspend the NRA without blinking.

Oh, and for a very recent example the recall elections in CO where the DNC, Bloomberg and other antigun folks out spent the pro gun side TEN times and both incumbent anti-gun politicians still lost.
When you talk about Presidential elections, or something like the CO initiative, the sides are fairly evenly matched in campaign contributions and funding. Where your argument breaks down, is in more one sided contests, like when someone attempts to oust an incumbent, who has been raking in campaign cash for favors for two to six, or more years. Who is the only person who is going to be able to compete against that? Only somebody who has somebody with big money backing and controlling them.

Mr. Smith goes to Washington is a fairy tale these days.
__________________
I sure miss the country I grew up in.
series1811 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2013, 13:03   #16
ked
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: tennessee
Posts: 2,355
Quote:
Originally Posted by czsmithGT View Post
That must have been an old clip. Ratigan was fired and replaced by that nitwit Martin Bashir in June 2012.

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2012...host-at-msnbc/
he mentioned 17 trillion in the beginning of the video. so it can't be too old.

ked
__________________
if a man speaks, and there's not a woman around to hear him, is he still wrong ?
ked is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2013, 19:20   #17
RickD
Pro-Open Curry
 
RickD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Arizona
Posts: 8,649
Send a message via AIM to RickD


This is not his first rant.

Google "Dylan Ratigan Rant."

He's a leftist populist, generally, with a business degree.
__________________
Get outta my OODA Loop
RickD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2013, 14:02   #18
czsmithGT
Senior Member
 
czsmithGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 10,092
Quote:
Originally Posted by ked View Post
he mentioned 17 trillion in the beginning of the video. so it can't be too old.

ked
Unfortunately, you are laboring under a misconception.

He said we owe SEVENTY TRILLION DOLLARS. not 17 trillion. He is talking about all the unfunded liabilities, not just the crap you see on the phony "debt clock".

The clip was from a show he did in August of 2011.
czsmithGT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2013, 17:48   #19
DonGlock26
Senior Member
 
DonGlock26's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 106,799
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slug71 View Post
Lol.
I bet a few liberals have quite the headache now after seeing this on their beloved media. More confused than ever.
That and Obamacare falling flat on its face.

I know a rabid progressive and she was all "Obamacare this and Obamacare that". Well lately, she has been a quiet as a church mouse.

__________________
"This is for all you new people: I only have one rule. Everyone fights.
No one quits. You don't do your job, I'll shoot you. You get me?"
- Lieutenant Jean Rasczak

Last edited by DonGlock26; 10-23-2013 at 17:48..
DonGlock26 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2013, 08:38   #20
TheJ
Lifetime Membership
NRA Life Member
 
TheJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: GA
Posts: 1,492
Blog Entries: 3
Quote:
Originally Posted by series1811 View Post
When you talk about Presidential elections, or something like the CO initiative, the sides are fairly evenly matched in campaign contributions and funding. Where your argument breaks down, is in more one sided contests, like when someone attempts to oust an incumbent, who has been raking in campaign cash for favors for two to six, or more years. Who is the only person who is going to be able to compete against that? Only somebody who has somebody with big money backing and controlling them.

Mr. Smith goes to Washington is a fairy tale these days.
My point is certainly not that money has no effect or that there is no corruption. It's merely that, contrary to the often parroted popular belief, economic resources are not nearly as easily converted to political resources as most believe or would have others believe.

Notice that especially in local contests unions have often had more political power than the far greater economic resourced companies they work. That is another example of how the political resource equation is obviously about far more than mere finance.

What I think many do not realize is that having people believe that wealth or income inequality will inevitably lead to a break down of democracy is among the central reasoning for redistributive and social-justice policies. It also in part why there is such a push back by liberals in legally treating corporations (made up people) as people... Because they see that as leading to a break down of democracy. If you read Friedrich Hayek (author of the Inequality Road to Serfdom), he uses similar slippery-slope logic that thrives in the thought of contemporary egalitarian liberals. You see it in the pages of academic journals and in the editorials in newspapers. There is more than one road to serfdom and, according to the liberals, an excess of income/wealth inequality sets us on one of them. If you convince everyone that money directly translates to political power than it is much easier to sell redistributive policies to most folks.


Edit: Also the presidential elections and CO recalls were cases where the sides were NOT matched. That was my point... that even though some political candidates vastly out financed the other they still lost.
In CO the two INCUMBENT Democrat politicians (one being the CO Senate President) in heavily Democrat precincts OUTSPENT their Republican challengers by 6-10 TIMES and yet they both still lost.
In the presidential elections Romney and his wife were many times more wealthy than Obama not just during the campaign but for many many years. He ran for president for years! With all that financial resources and years of campaigning he certainly should have carried far far more political weight into the election if financial resources were easily converted to political resources.. Similar story for John (Heinz) Kerry and his wife were vastly more wealthy than George Bush and his wife yet similar outcome to the Obama/Romney campaign...

The story plays out over and over agin. Yes of course money plays a role in getting organized and messages out but you simply can not escape the fact that financial resources are NOT very easily converted to political resources. Money is but one part of the equation of politics.
__________________
Jay

The test of a first rate intelligence is the ability to hold two opposed ideas in the mind at the same time, and still retain the ability to function. -F. Scott Fitzgerald

Last edited by TheJ; 10-26-2013 at 11:14..
TheJ is offline   Reply With Quote

 
  
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 23:13.




Homepage
FAQ
Forums
Calendar
Advertise
Gallery
GT Wiki
GT Blogs
Social Groups
Classifieds


Users Currently Online: 983
226 Members
757 Guests

Most users ever online: 2,672
Aug 11, 2014 at 2:31