Home Forums Classifieds Blogs Today's Posts Search Social Groups



  
SIGN-UP
Notices

Glock Talk
Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.

 
  
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-21-2009, 14:49   #1
coltm4a3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 105
Opinions on S&W Mod 317 .22lr airlite (for wife)

Well, my wife is interested in the Model 317 .22lr for a "quick and easy, better than nothing" purse or pocket gun. She fully understands what a .22lr can and can't do, and just like how I carry my scandium revolver, it's the same reason she wants this gun- very light, and since she can't handle the recoil on an aluminum .38, figures this would fit the bill as the "better than nothing" gun.

That being said, has anyone fired the 317, and if so, how's the felt recoil and handling of the gun? I'm sure most men wouldn't object, but what about a 90lb woman with small hands? Does anyone have one of these for their wife? I know it would be a nice little trail gun also.

Just looking for opinions on this gun before I drop $500 on one...
coltm4a3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2009, 01:03   #2
DJ Niner
Moderator
 
DJ Niner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: North-Central USA
Posts: 17,789
I've owned both the 2" and 3" versions; still have the longer one. Even with the heaviest loads (probably Velocitor), recoil doesn't begin to approach the level of a .38 in a similar size/weight weapon. The double-action trigger pull is somewhat heavy, and the springs can't be lightened much or you may get misfires in DA mode. If you get the 2" version, expect the point-of-aim/point-of-impact to be off by 2" or more at 10+ yards, and it could be MUCH farther, depending on the load and the shooter (that's why I ultimately went to the 3" with adjustable sights).

Mine primarily pulls trail-gun duty because, as you mentioned, it's perfect in that role. I'm hesitant to recommend a rimfire for defensive purposes, mostly due to the quality of the ammo, but it would be better than a rock/sharp stick/no weapon at all.

My older model, w/plain black sights (preferred over the neon dot stuff currently offered):
The Snubbie Club
DJ Niner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2009, 08:58   #3
Messer
Senior Member
 
Messer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Central Virginia
Posts: 564
Here are a couple of other options...

Take a look at the S&W 351PD and the new 632 Carry Comp.

The 351 is a 22 magnum, almost no kick (but a big BOOM), and has better ballistics than the 22LR.

The 632 is the new 327 magnum (not 357), so it can shoot the very docile 32 S&W long ammo, the 32 Magnum (much better than either 22), and the new 327 magnum which is said to be between the 38 Spec. +P and 357 Magnum in performance.

Good luck,
Bob S,.
__________________
When seconds count, the police are just minutes away!
Messer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2009, 09:01   #4
GeorgeM223
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Colorado
Posts: 304
I don't have alot of experience with .22lr revolvers but we used this one during our nra instructor pre-qual test. As mentioned, the double-action trigger pull felt on the heavy side but other than that, I liked it. In fact, I'm interested in getting one as well but in my area they are selling for $650!!!!
GeorgeM223 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2009, 20:47   #5
HK-N-THE-HOUSE
Silver Membership
Senior Member
 
HK-N-THE-HOUSE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: MISSOURI
Posts: 452
22's = hours and hours of fun.
HK-N-THE-HOUSE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2009, 22:43   #6
Mike2x
Enthusiast
 
Mike2x's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Avalon, CA
Posts: 94
I bought my wife the 3" 317 several years ago. The recoil is negligable. Light weight, eight rounds, heavy double action, pretty crisp single action. My 12 year old son uses it mostly at the range. My wife has carried it a few times on road trips. I love the airlite/airweight J frames.
__________________
Be kind, choose right, seek justice.
Member: NRA, CIGC, IBU
Mike2x is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2009, 22:55   #7
alank2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,914
Hi,

I have read that the trigger pull on the 317 is very heavy.

Not all 38 spl is the same in an aluminum snub. You can find some pretty mild 38 stuff that might be much better. I think Federal makes some low recoil 110gr stuff that might be worth checking out.

32H&R might be worth looking into as well, you get an additional round (6 shot) and it can shoot 32 S&W Long's as well.

There is a 32H&R S&W Snub on gunbroker right now NIB:

http://www.gunbroker.com/Auction/Vie...Item=123271056

I'd be real hard pressed to not find a very low recoil 38 load, even the real tame 148gr lead double ended wadcutter, and go with a 38 special myself. I'll bet if you try hard enough you could get a 38 to work for her with the right load.

Grips may make a big difference as well. For the price of that 317, you could get a 642 or 442 and add some crimson trace lasergrips, model LG-405 which has rubber cushioning in the front and back to control recoil.

Plan on paying for a trigger job.

Good luck,

Alan
alank2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2009, 13:28   #8
coltm4a3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 105
Quote:
Originally Posted by alank2 View Post
Hi,

I have read that the trigger pull on the 317 is very heavy.

Not all 38 spl is the same in an aluminum snub. You can find some pretty mild 38 stuff that might be much better. I think Federal makes some low recoil 110gr stuff that might be worth checking out.

32H&R might be worth looking into as well, you get an additional round (6 shot) and it can shoot 32 S&W Long's as well.

There is a 32H&R S&W Snub on gunbroker right now NIB:

http://www.gunbroker.com/Auction/Vie...Item=123271056

I'd be real hard pressed to not find a very low recoil 38 load, even the real tame 148gr lead double ended wadcutter, and go with a 38 special myself. I'll bet if you try hard enough you could get a 38 to work for her with the right load.

Grips may make a big difference as well. For the price of that 317, you could get a 642 or 442 and add some crimson trace lasergrips, model LG-405 which has rubber cushioning in the front and back to control recoil.

Plan on paying for a trigger job.

Good luck,

Alan

Well, I'm going to pass on the 317 for now because of the trigger pull... my wife does not like really heavy trigger pulls, and this sounds like it fits in that category. I had an old Jennings p-380 that had a 15# trigger pull, and she couldn't fire it. Again, she's a petite woman and I need the gun to fit her needs and work well for her in a stressful situation.

THe .32 H&R airweight looks like the next step, so does anyone know how the trigger pull is on it? It's a centerfire round, so that should take care of the heavy trigger pull. What about Round selection? I don't know alot about this round. Perhaps a lighter round in this gun would be just as good as a .22lr or .22mag, correct? Plus if I ever decide to use the gun, I can always load it with the .32 MAG rounds, which would be a plus.

As far as grips goes, I plan on getting her the larger Crimson Trace grips (I think the 305's), she likes the larger rubber grips so she has more control.

It may be hard finding one in my area, also, as they no longer produce it... UGH. This is turning into a challenge!

Maybe a .327 MAG Airweight with an underpowered round for her, and the .327 mag rounds for when I carry it?

This is a tougher decision than I thought it would be....

Last edited by coltm4a3; 02-27-2009 at 13:53..
coltm4a3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2009, 13:06   #9
hiram2005p0
Senior Member
 
hiram2005p0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Hamilton County Indiana
Posts: 644
Order a reduced power spring kit from Brownells for the J-frame and replace just coil mainspring in the 317. My 317 had a very heavy pull and I did this and it dramatically reduced the pull weight but is still reliable. $9 from brownells.
__________________
"A man's got to have a creed, a code to live by,no matter his job."
hiram2005p0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2009, 12:36   #10
JFrame
Senior Member
 
JFrame's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Mid-Atlantic, US of A
Posts: 32,521
Quote:
Originally Posted by hiram2005p0 View Post
Order a reduced power spring kit from Brownells for the J-frame and replace just coil mainspring in the 317. My 317 had a very heavy pull and I did this and it dramatically reduced the pull weight but is still reliable. $9 from brownells.

That's interesting -- I may consider doing that swap-out myself...

Can you tell me approximately how many rounds you might have put through your 317 since doing the spring swap?
__________________
"When newspapers are controlled, it's amazing how ignorant and immune from pressure the government can be." -- Amartya Sen

--
JFrame is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2009, 00:22   #11
DJ Niner
Moderator
 
DJ Niner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: North-Central USA
Posts: 17,789
Quote:
Originally Posted by hiram2005p0 View Post
Order a reduced power spring kit from Brownells for the J-frame and replace just coil mainspring in the 317. My 317 had a very heavy pull and I did this and it dramatically reduced the pull weight but is still reliable. $9 from brownells.
Have you shot it much in double-action mode, or is most/all of your firing done single-action (cocking the hammer first, for those who might not know)?
DJ Niner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2009, 20:44   #12
joeshmow
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 118
...........

Last edited by joeshmow; 11-22-2009 at 21:06..
joeshmow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2009, 21:06   #13
joeshmow
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 118
---------------------

Last edited by joeshmow; 11-25-2009 at 20:30..
joeshmow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2009, 16:31   #14
john from md
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Davidsonville, MD
Posts: 216
I know that this is an old thread but I have a suggestion for adding light springs to the 317. That is, to purchase an extended firing pin from Brownells. The 317 use an offset round firing pin that is identical to the K frame pins. By putting an extended firing pin in when you reduce the mainspring power, you lessen or eliminate the misfires.

I speak from experience as I own a 3" 317 and, since I added the long firing pin, does not miss a beat. I also changed the front sight to one with a orange insert and find it is easier to aim outdoors. You can also add a fiber optic front sight if you so desire.

Regards,

John
__________________
John from MD
john from md is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2009, 01:08   #15
Ak.Hiker
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Homer Alaska
Posts: 2,325
I picked up a 3 inch 317 several years ago. I like it. My wife took it one year to Alabama in the summer and in hot weather while target shooting when the gun got hot it would bind up. Never had that problem in Alaska. Of course it would not be an issue when firing the gun cold.
Ak.Hiker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2009, 10:18   #16
JFrame
Senior Member
 
JFrame's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Mid-Atlantic, US of A
Posts: 32,521
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ak.Hiker View Post
I picked up a 3 inch 317 several years ago. I like it. My wife took it one year to Alabama in the summer and in hot weather while target shooting when the gun got hot it would bind up. Never had that problem in Alaska. Of course it would not be an issue when firing the gun cold.
Just curious -- when you say "bind up," do you mean the cylinder wouldn't rotate, the casings wouldn't eject, or some other difficulty?

I have a S&W 63 and 317, and have never encountered that phenomenon. I've shot on some pretty hot summer days also -- but maybe not as hot as Alabama can get...

.
__________________
"When newspapers are controlled, it's amazing how ignorant and immune from pressure the government can be." -- Amartya Sen

--
JFrame is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2009, 17:36   #17
Ak.Hiker
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Homer Alaska
Posts: 2,325
She said the cylinder was hard to rotate. It could have been from the hot weather or perhaps the gun needed to be cleaned. It is pretty tight. This has never happened to me.
Ak.Hiker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2009, 19:41   #18
JFrame
Senior Member
 
JFrame's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Mid-Atlantic, US of A
Posts: 32,521
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ak.Hiker View Post
She said the cylinder was hard to rotate. It could have been from the hot weather or perhaps the gun needed to be cleaned. It is pretty tight. This has never happened to me.

Thanks -- I guess that's the classic definition of "binding." Wow -- that must be one heck of a tight cylinder!

.
__________________
"When newspapers are controlled, it's amazing how ignorant and immune from pressure the government can be." -- Amartya Sen

--
JFrame is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2010, 23:05   #19
hiram2005p0
Senior Member
 
hiram2005p0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Hamilton County Indiana
Posts: 644
Quote:
Originally Posted by DJ Niner View Post
Have you shot it much in double-action mode, or is most/all of your firing done single-action (cocking the hammer first, for those who might not know)?
Wow, just found the thread again and I never answered you guys.
I always fire my 317 double action as it is hard to cock due to the stubby hammer. I've had no problems with any misfires and I've probably put 500 rds thru it since the spring change.
__________________
"A man's got to have a creed, a code to live by,no matter his job."
hiram2005p0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2010, 19:28   #20
joeshmow
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 118
Quote:
Originally Posted by DJ Niner View Post
I've owned both the 2" and 3" versions; still have the longer one. Even with the heaviest loads (probably Velocitor), recoil doesn't begin to approach the level of a .38 in a similar size/weight weapon. The double-action trigger pull is somewhat heavy, and the springs can't be lightened much or you may get misfires in DA mode. If you get the 2" version, expect the point-of-aim/point-of-impact to be off by 2" or more at 10+ yards, and it could be MUCH farther, depending on the load and the shooter (that's why I ultimately went to the 3" with adjustable sights).

Mine primarily pulls trail-gun duty because, as you mentioned, it's perfect in that role. I'm hesitant to recommend a rimfire for defensive purposes, mostly due to the quality of the ammo, but it would be better than a rock/sharp stick/no weapon at all.

My older model, w/plain black sights (preferred over the neon dot stuff currently offered):
Same situation here. I've owned both, and yes the 3" with the adjustable sights is much more accurate, and yes the 2" is off by a few inches at the range, but then it's not a range gun - and the 2" handily fits in the pocket - and it is lighter and more compact than even the Scandium 340PD. And while the .22 is a weak round there is virtually no recoil and consequently follow up shots can be more accurate, and it holds 8 shots vs. the 340PD's five. I like it.
joeshmow is offline   Reply With Quote

 
  
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:32.




Homepage
FAQ
Forums
Calendar
Advertise
Gallery
GT Wiki
GT Blogs
Social Groups
Classifieds


Users Currently Online: 911
256 Members
655 Guests

Most users ever online: 2,672
Aug 11, 2014 at 2:31