Home Forums Classifieds Blogs Today's Posts Search Social Groups



  
SIGN-UP
Notices

Glock Talk
Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.

 
  
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-13-2009, 19:08   #1
watsoncb
CLM Number 40
Charter Lifetime Member
 
watsoncb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Falls Church
Posts: 717
Send a message via MSN to watsoncb Send a message via Yahoo to watsoncb


Proposed Gun Band Legislation

I got this in an email, I am not sure what the impact will be on
Virginians, but I thought I would pass it on. You could make this
your shopping list for the next gun show. If I read the proposed
bill correctly, we could loose all Glocks and SIGS because they
are carried by federal agents.

We knew it would be coming, the framework for legislation is
always laid, and the Democrats have the votes to pass anything they want
to impose upon us. They really do not believe you need anything more
than a brick to defend your home and family. Look at the list and see
how many you own. Remember, it is registration, then confiscation. It
has happened in the UK, in Australia, in Europe, in China, and what they
have found is that for some reason the criminals do not turn in their
weapons, but will know that you did. Please send this to everyone you
can. It will come up for a vote, and it might even be a secret vote if
Madame Pelosi has her way, and then it will be a done deal.
...thanks to all of those who voted Democrat in the last election
…….The Savior and his cronies are bringing “Change” to Socialism …..

Right to own a gun Remember, The first step in establishing a
dictatorship is to disarm the citizens.

Subject: Gun Law Update by Alan Korwin, Democrats have already leaked a
gun-ban list. Forward or send to every gun owner you know...Gun Law
Update by Alan Korwin, Author Gun Laws of America. Jan. 5, 2008.
Gun-ban list proposed. Slipping below the radar (or under the short-term
memory cap), the Democrats have already leaked a gun-ban list, even
under the Bush administration when they knew full well it had no chance
of passage (HR 1022, 110th Congress) It serves as a framework for the
new list the Brady's plan to introduce shortly. I have an outline of
the Brady's current plans and targets of opportunity, It's horrific.
They're going after the courts, regulatory agencies, firearms dealers
and statutes in an all out effort to restrict we the people. They've
made little mention of criminals. Now more than ever, attention to the
entire Bill of Rights is critical. Gun bans will impact our freedoms
under search and seizure, due process, confiscated property, states'
rights, free speech, right to assemble and more, in addition to the
Second Amendment. The Democrats current gun-ban-list proposal (final
list will be worse):

Rifles (or copies or duplicates):

* M1 Carbine,
* Sturm Ruger Mini-14,
* AR-15,
* Bushmaster XM15,
* Armalite M15,
* AR-10,
* Thompson 1927,
* Thompson M1;
* AK,
* AKM,
* AKS,
* AK-47,
* AK-74,
* ARM,
* MAK90,
* NHM 90,
* NHM 91,
* SA 85,
* SA 93,
* VEPR;
* Olympic Arms PCR;
* AR70,
* Calico Liberty ,
* Dragunov SVD Sniper Rifle or Dragunov SVU,
* Fabrique National FN/FAL,
* FN/LAR, or FNC,
* Hi-Point20Carbine,
* HK-91,
* HK-93,
* HK-94,
* HK-PSG-1,
* Thompson 1927 Commando,
* Kel-Tec Sub Rifle;
* Saiga,
* SAR-8,
* SAR-4800,
* SKS with detachable magazine,
* SLG 95,
* SLR 95 or 96,
* Steyr AU,
* Tavor,
* Uzi,
* Galil and Uzi Sporter,
* Galil Sporter, or Galil Sniper Rifle ( Galatz ).

Pistols (or copies or duplicates):

* Calico M-110,
* MAC-10,
* MAC-11, or MPA3,
* Olympic Arms OA,
* TEC-9,
* TEC-DC9,
* TEC-22 Scorpion, or AB-10,
* Uzi.

Shotguns (or copies or duplicates):

* Armscor 30 BG,
* SPAS 12 or LAW 12,
* Striker 12,
* Streetsweeper. Catch-all category (for anything missed or new
designs):

A semiautomatic rifle that accepts a detachable magazine and has:

(i) a folding or telescoping stock,
(ii) a threaded barrel,
(iii) a pistol grip (which includes ANYTHING that can serve as a
grip, see below),
(iv) a forward grip; or a barrel shroud.

Any semiautomatic rifle with a fixed magazine that can accept more than
10 rounds (except tubular magazine .22 rim fire rifles).

A semiautomatic pistol that has the ability to accept a detachable
magazine, and has:

(i) a second pistol grip,
(ii) a threaded barrel,
(iii) a barrel shroud or
(iv) can accept a detachable magazine outside of the pistol grip,
and
(v) a semiautomatic pistol with a fixed magazine that can accept
more than 10 rounds.

A semiautomatic shotgun with:

(i) a folding or telescoping stock,
(ii) a pistol grip (see definition below),
(iii) the ability to accept a detachable magazine or a fixed
magazine capacity of more than 5 rounds, and
(iv) a shotgun with a revolving cylinder.

Frames or receivers for the above are included, along with conversion
kits.

Attorney General gets carte blanche to ban guns at will:

Under the proposal, the U.S. Attorney General can add any "semiautomatic
rifle or shotgun originally designed for military or law enforcement
use, or a firearm based on the design of such a firearm, that is not
particularly suitable for sporting purposes, as determined by the
Attorney General." Note that Obama's pick for this office (Eric Holder,
confirmation hearing set for Jan. 15) wrote a brief in the Heller case
supporting the position that you have no right to have a working firearm
in your own home.

In making this determination, the bill says, "there shall be a
rebuttable presumption that a firearm procured for use by the United
States military or any federal law enforcement agency is not
particularly suitable for sporting purposes, and a firearm shall not be
determined to be particularly suitable for sporting purposes solely
because the firearm is suitable for use in a sporting event." In plain
English this means that ANY firearm ever obtained by federal officers or
the military is not suitable for the public.

The last part is particularly clever, stating that a firearm doesn't
have a sporting purpose just because it can be used for sporting purpose
-- is that devious or what? And of course, "sporting purpose" is a
rights infringement with no constitutional or historical support
whatsoever, invented by domestic enemies of the right to keep and bear
arms to further their cause of disarming the innocent.


Respectfully submitted, Alan Korwin, Author Gun Laws of America
http://www.gunlaws.com/gloa.htm <http://www.gunlaws.com/gloa.htm>
__________________
Stay thristy my friends...
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.

Glock Talk Charter Lifetime Member #40
Glockers of the Old Dominion #648
Smith & Wesson Club #648
Black Rifle Club #648
Kalashnikov Klub #648
The 10 Ring #648
Sub Club #648

Last edited by watsoncb; 03-13-2009 at 19:12.. Reason: Spelling kills.
watsoncb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2009, 17:36   #2
MavsX
The Dude Abides
 
MavsX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 3,033
i hope not
__________________
Glock 22 .40 S&W
CMMG M4 LEP II
Mossberg 500 Mariner
MavsX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2009, 18:07   #3
Nicko
GTDS FOR LIFE
 
Nicko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
Posts: 10,393
Send a message via AIM to Nicko Send a message via Yahoo to Nicko
They'll never take my Glock!
__________________
Tequila gun makes it all better!! Open up and say AAAHHH...

<<<<Was "beat in" to join GTDS
"Nicko your ignored too, so if that last message was a insult which I expect nothing less then I cant see it."........Porterhouse83
Nicko is offline   Reply With Quote

 
  
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:10.




Homepage
FAQ
Forums
Calendar
Advertise
Gallery
GT Wiki
GT Blogs
Social Groups
Classifieds


Users Currently Online: 875
279 Members
596 Guests

Most users ever online: 2,672
Aug 11, 2014 at 2:31