GlockTalk.com
Home Forums Classifieds Blogs Today's Posts Search Social Groups



  
SIGN-UP
Notices

Glock Talk
Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.

 
  
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-31-2009, 23:33   #1
bcj128
Senior Member
 
bcj128's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: La La Land
Posts: 730
Any input on the 338 Federal

I am looking at the Ruger Frontier rifle in 338 Federal. Anyone have any info on this caliber? What is the recoil like, and what kind of game is to good for?
__________________
Certified Glock Armorer
G19 Gen 4, G21 Gen 4, G30S, G42, G35 Gen 3
Glocks...it's a sickness...
bcj128 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2009, 05:34   #2
MSgt Dotson
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,226
I would imagine it capable of taking anything in the USA, including in ALaska, via it's heavier/larger bullets....

Might not equal the .338 WinMag with all heavier bullet weights, but , ...so what...
MSgt Dotson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2009, 13:12   #3
Zombie Steve
Decap Pin Killa
 
Zombie Steve's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Old Colorado City
Posts: 19,935
Sorry to add more speculation, but I asked this question as one of my first threads here, and no response...


The American Rifleman article written when it first came out said it felt like shooting 180's out of a 30-06.

As far as game - they had a pic of the author of the article grinning over a huge black bear - apparently went through one shoulder, all the way through the torso and broke the other shoulder without exiting. I can't remember what grain or type of bullet he was using. I'd guess it would take any large game in North America... performance is often compared to a 7mm mag.

Shooting a .338 out of a .308 case has been wildcatted to death over the years... it was about time someone standardized it. That said, I still have not shot one, but it holds my interest...
Zombie Steve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2009, 13:29   #4
fredj338
Senior Member
 
fredj338's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: so.cal.
Posts: 21,612
Blog Entries: 3
I routinely hunt w/ a 338-06. The 338Fed. is sim. but you'll lose about 150fps w/ all bullet wts. It's NOT even close to a 338winmag, but would be a nice short range (under 250yd) rifle for most of NA hunting. It pretty much maxs out w/ a 225gr bullet in the short case. I've though of buidling one to go w/ the 338-06, but see little reason to. It could be had on a short action, light wt. rifle that wouldn't bet the crap out of you. It's best w/ a 200-210gr bullet @ 2600fps. The 338-06 will make 2750fps+ & the 3382inmag 3000fps. I see it as a great timber rifle for deer & elk, but much beyond 250yds, it's losing too much vel. for reliable expansion w/ anything but 185gr or 200gr Nosler bal.tips. As always, JMO.
__________________
"Given adequate penetration, a larger diameter bullet will have an edge in wounding effectiveness. It will damage a blood vessel the smaller projectile barely misses. The larger permanent cavity may lead to faster blood loss. Although such an edge clearly exists, its significance cannot be quantified".
fredj338 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2009, 15:09   #5
dougader
Senior Member
 
dougader's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: OryGun
Posts: 3,382
Agree with Fred. And the loading data I've seen doesn't look any better than stated.

Always wanted to get into a 338-06, though.
__________________
Doug

"In St. Louis, armed Homeland Security agents monitored Tea Party members protesting the IRS. Good idea. When people think their government is out to get them, the best response is to send the government out to get them." -Fred Thompson
dougader is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2009, 15:36   #6
fredj338
Senior Member
 
fredj338's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: so.cal.
Posts: 21,612
Blog Entries: 3
Quote:
Originally Posted by dougader View Post
Agree with Fred. And the loading data I've seen doesn't look any better than stated.

Always wanted to get into a 338-06, though.
It's agreat round, should have been standardized years ago. I have taken coyotes to elk, zebra & all things inbetween. With a 210grNP @ 2750fps, it shoots as flat as the 06 w/ 180gr loads & hits just a bit harder. It is my go to round for Montana elk/deer. If you ever get into one, PM me for some very good handloads.
__________________
"Given adequate penetration, a larger diameter bullet will have an edge in wounding effectiveness. It will damage a blood vessel the smaller projectile barely misses. The larger permanent cavity may lead to faster blood loss. Although such an edge clearly exists, its significance cannot be quantified".
fredj338 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2009, 19:01   #7
Jeepnik
Senior Member
 
Jeepnik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,726
Something new to get you to spend your money on. Won't kill anything any deader than rounds dating back to the 1870's.
Jeepnik is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2009, 19:05   #8
dougader
Senior Member
 
dougader's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: OryGun
Posts: 3,382
Will do, Fred. I have been hunting with the 30-06 for years and never saw any real reason to change but have always liked what I have read about the 338-06.

In a recent Handloader mag the writer was talking about 338 WIn Mag and how he and most people actually load them down... at or below 338-06 levels sometimes for elk and especially deer. Then I've seen guys who load their 338-06's to near 338 mag velocities. It all makes me think the 338-06 should be a heck of a lot more popular than it is.

If Remington, Ruger or Browning had a rifle in 338-06 I'd buy one. All I see on the market now are overpriced old stock Weatherby's and a few custom guns made by guys I never heard of.
__________________
Doug

"In St. Louis, armed Homeland Security agents monitored Tea Party members protesting the IRS. Good idea. When people think their government is out to get them, the best response is to send the government out to get them." -Fred Thompson
dougader is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2009, 21:06   #9
fredj338
Senior Member
 
fredj338's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: so.cal.
Posts: 21,612
Blog Entries: 3
Quote:
Originally Posted by dougader View Post
Will do, Fred. I have been hunting with the 30-06 for years and never saw any real reason to change but have always liked what I have read about the 338-06.

In a recent Handloader mag the writer was talking about 338 WIn Mag and how he and most people actually load them down... at or below 338-06 levels sometimes for elk and especially deer. Then I've seen guys who load their 338-06's to near 338 mag velocities. It all makes me think the 338-06 should be a heck of a lot more popular than it is.

If Remington, Ruger or Browning had a rifle in 338-06 I'd buy one. All I see on the market now are overpriced old stock Weatherby's and a few custom guns made by guys I never heard of.
The great thing about the 338-06 is all you need is a 06 based rifle & a new bbl. You can buy brass or make it by necking up 06 or 280 or 270 brass, or necking down 35whelen brass. Is it better than your 06, probably not for 98% of hunting, but for big animals in close, it is just a bit better IMO. The 250grSP @ 2550fps smack stuff pretty hard.
__________________
"Given adequate penetration, a larger diameter bullet will have an edge in wounding effectiveness. It will damage a blood vessel the smaller projectile barely misses. The larger permanent cavity may lead to faster blood loss. Although such an edge clearly exists, its significance cannot be quantified".
fredj338 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2009, 21:27   #10
dougader
Senior Member
 
dougader's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: OryGun
Posts: 3,382
I know I'd want one if I were hunting anywhere grizzly or Alaskan browns roamed. The 250 gr. load would be my choice for elk in montana or moose in alaska.
__________________
Doug

"In St. Louis, armed Homeland Security agents monitored Tea Party members protesting the IRS. Good idea. When people think their government is out to get them, the best response is to send the government out to get them." -Fred Thompson
dougader is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2009, 22:16   #11
msoprano
Senior Member
 
msoprano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 731
I would imagine that the recoil in a Ruger Frontier would be substantial. I too am interested in a .338 federal, but have yet to make the leap.
msoprano is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2009, 03:15   #12
BOGE
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Posts: 5,555
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeepnik View Post
Something new to get you to spend your money on. Won't kill anything any deader than rounds dating back to the 1870's.

True, but I don't like lugging my 16 lbs. Sharps 50-90 around!!

BOGE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2009, 15:40   #13
Jeepnik
Senior Member
 
Jeepnik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,726
Quote:
Originally Posted by BOGE View Post
True, but I don't like lugging my 16 lbs. Sharps 50-90 around!!

That's what horses are for.
Jeepnik is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2010, 15:39   #14
Glock1911
Jackson Wagoner
 
Glock1911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Inside your head
Posts: 758
If you were in Kodiak/Alaskan Brownie country which bullet loading would be best in the .338 Federal?
Glock1911 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2010, 15:46   #15
Glock1911
Jackson Wagoner
 
Glock1911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Inside your head
Posts: 758
double post

Last edited by Glock1911; 06-16-2010 at 15:51..
Glock1911 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2010, 17:45   #16
dougader
Senior Member
 
dougader's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: OryGun
Posts: 3,382
Quote:
Originally Posted by Glock1911 View Post
If you were in Kodiak/Alaskan Brownie country which bullet loading would be best in the .338 Federal?
The 250 grain load in 338 Federal slows down quite a bit. I'd look toward a Nosler Partition or Trophy Bonded Bear Claw (or some other bullet known for controlled expansion and deep penetration) in the 210 - 225 grain weight.
__________________
Doug

"In St. Louis, armed Homeland Security agents monitored Tea Party members protesting the IRS. Good idea. When people think their government is out to get them, the best response is to send the government out to get them." -Fred Thompson
dougader is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2010, 17:50   #17
BOGE
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Posts: 5,555
If you can handle a 338 then you can handle a 375 H&H IMO.
BOGE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2010, 21:27   #18
TheGrimReaper
Senior Member
 
TheGrimReaper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Fayetteville, TN
Posts: 1,114
.338 Fed is a very nice round. Especially if you handload.
TheGrimReaper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2010, 07:31   #19
Glock1911
Jackson Wagoner
 
Glock1911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Inside your head
Posts: 758
"If you can handle a 338 then you can handle a 375 H&H IMO."

Well, that certainly puts the round in a perspective, recoil wise, that I can relate to. Too bad they don't make an AR platform that will handle the .375 H&H.

I guess I should have mentioned that I've been toying with the idea of converting an AR to .338 for use as a "camp" gun. Probably, over kill, but...
Glock1911 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2010, 09:25   #20
BOGE
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Posts: 5,555
Quote:
Originally Posted by Glock1911 View Post
...I guess I should have mentioned that I've been toying with the idea of converting an AR to .338 for use as a "camp" gun. Probably, over kill, but...
They make an AR in 338? Last I knew only Browning made a semi-auto rifle in 338.
BOGE is offline   Reply With Quote

 
  
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 16:25.




Homepage
FAQ
Forums
Calendar
Advertise
Gallery
GT Wiki
GT Blogs
Social Groups
Classifieds


Users Currently Online: 1,139
313 Members
826 Guests

Most users ever online: 2,244
Nov 11, 2013 at 16:42