GlockTalk.com
Home Forums Classifieds Blogs Today's Posts Search Social Groups



  
SIGN-UP
Notices

Glock Talk
Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-01-2009, 18:47   #1
cgchu
CLM Number
Charter Lifetime Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: PNW
Posts: 83
Proposed Firearm Rule in Seattle

If you guys get a chance, please hit this site and give the city an earful about Mayor McCheese's last attempt to compromise our safety.

http://www.seattle.gov/firearmsrule/
cgchu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2009, 22:09   #2
spdski
CLM Number 294
NRA Life Member
 
spdski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 4,174
Quote:
Originally Posted by cgchu View Post
If you guys get a chance, please hit this site and give the city an earful about Mayor McCheese's last attempt to compromise our safety.

http://www.seattle.gov/firearmsrule/
I am reposting this in Carry Issues. Might as well get some more comments!
spdski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2009, 18:24   #3
remat
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,364
Comment period ends today!!!
remat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2009, 16:48   #4
spdski
CLM Number 294
NRA Life Member
 
spdski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 4,174
Quote:
Only 8 percent of Seattle residents commenting on the idea support it, according to figures from the mayor’s office. Ninety-two percent of Seattleites who opined rejected the idea. Only 2 percent of respondents who live outside the city support the proposed ban, and 98 percent oppose the idea. Deadline for comments was last Sunday. SAF has learned that the city received 1,088 comments via e-mail, and only 44 supported the mayor’s proposal. Ten more telephone comments were received, with only one favoring the ban.
spdski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2009, 11:59   #5
GackMan
Senior Member
 
GackMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: PacNW
Posts: 2,361
I like this part:

Quote:
This rule/policy does not include any criminal or civil penalties. Rather, it constitutes conditions placed upon a personís permission to enter or remain at a designated Parks Department facility at which appropriate signage has been posted. Such conditions shall be enforced in the same manner and pursuant to the same ordinances and statutes as similar conditions could be enforced by private property owners.
sure - pass whatever admisitrative 'suggestion' you want.
__________________
It is called "The Bill of Rights" not "The Bill of Needs."
GackMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 15:40.



Homepage
FAQ
Forums
Calendar
Advertise
Gallery
GT Wiki
GT Blogs
Social Groups
Classifieds


Users Currently Online: 1,181
356 Members
825 Guests

Most users ever online: 2,244
Nov 11, 2013 at 11:42