GlockTalk.com
Home Forums Classifieds Blogs Today's Posts Search Social Groups



  
SIGN-UP
Notices

Glock Talk
Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.

 
  
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-17-2009, 23:02   #1
Fishin6061
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 24
147gr .357sig ammo

I saw that doubletap has a bonded JHP in the 147gr. Is any one familiar with this load and what are the possible pros and cons of this load in relationship with the tried and true 125gr offering that we are more familiar with?<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /><o:p></o:p>
Fishin6061 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2009, 23:09   #2
G33
CLM Number 296
Re-Assigned
 
G33's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: With G29
Posts: 57,779


All other factors equal, heavier bullets penetrate deeper.
!47 gr XTPs by Hornady are excellent.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.


"I'd wager G would waterboard a salmon."--tous

"...those without swords can still die upon them." --Eowyn
G33 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2009, 23:11   #3
JBarbaresi
Senior Member
 
JBarbaresi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: GOODE, VA
Posts: 1,711
i don't have any first hand experience with this yet but my thoughts are similar to the 9mm 124gr vs. 147gr argument. a lot of .357 guys will probably argue that 147 defeats the purpose of the .357 round because it travels slower than the 125gr. people said the same thing when the 147gr 9mm loads first came out... its too slow and heavy, won't expand, worthless, yada yada yada.

now everyone knows how tried and true the 147gr 9mm loads are. imagine taking a bullet like that that travels around 950fps or so, and adding another 200-300 fps in .357 caliber. it may not travel as fast as the 125gr rounds, but it probably has similar if not better ballistic characteristics.

like i said, just my thoughts without having personally fired any or seen any actual testing reports on the subject.
JBarbaresi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2009, 21:23   #4
skip a stone
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: K.C. metro area of MO.
Posts: 629
Quote:
Originally Posted by JBarbaresi View Post
i don't have any first hand experience with this yet but my thoughts are similar to the 9mm 124gr vs. 147gr argument. a lot of .357 guys will probably argue that 147 defeats the purpose of the .357 round because it travels slower than the 125gr. people said the same thing when the 147gr 9mm loads first came out... its too slow and heavy, won't expand, worthless, yada yada yada.

now everyone knows how tried and true the 147gr 9mm loads are. imagine taking a bullet like that that travels around 950fps or so, and adding another 200-300 fps in .357 caliber. it may not travel as fast as the 125gr rounds, but it probably has similar if not better ballistic characteristics.

like i said, just my thoughts without having personally fired any or seen any actual testing reports on the subject.
Similiar thoughts on this. My backup mag for my G33 is filled with DoubleTap 147gr bonded JHP's My loaded mag is filled with 125 gr DoubleTap bonded JHP's or CorBon 115gr JHP's depending on weather and season (more layers of clothes) I still think faster and heavier is better if you have to punch through a barrier to eliminate a threat.
skip a stone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2009, 11:49   #5
AKsRule
Member
 
AKsRule's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: PA
Posts: 77
If I want more than a 125gr I just use one of my .40sw guns
__________________
"I am the NRA"
"Escape from NY-the Sequel"
AKsRule is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2009, 17:18   #6
fredj338
Senior Member
 
fredj338's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: so.cal.
Posts: 21,624
Blog Entries: 3
Quote:
Originally Posted by AKsRule View Post
If I want more than a 125gr I just use one of my .40sw guns
Yeah, I'm kind of in the same camo. I tried some 147grXTP @ 1250fps in wetpack & was really unimpressed. They do penetrate deep but so do many other 124gr-125gr designs @ almost 1400fps in longer bbls. A midrange JHP like the 135grGD would be an interesting alternative @ 1300fps+.
__________________
"Given adequate penetration, a larger diameter bullet will have an edge in wounding effectiveness. It will damage a blood vessel the smaller projectile barely misses. The larger permanent cavity may lead to faster blood loss. Although such an edge clearly exists, its significance cannot be quantified".
fredj338 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2009, 20:11   #7
threefeathers
Scouts Out
 
threefeathers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Southwest
Posts: 1,267
There is probably a purpose, but the 357Sig was designed to equal the 125 grain Mag load and it comes darn near. That will continue to be my carry load.
threefeathers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-25-2009, 17:54   #8
Peter M. Eick
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Houston, TX, USA
Posts: 746
Send a message via ICQ to Peter M. Eick
I found 147 XTP's to be exceptionally accurate. If they were cheaper they would be my "standard" load.
__________________
10MM & 357 SIG, best things to come along since the 38 Super!
Peter M. Eick is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2009, 04:34   #9
Fishin6061
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 24
Thanks for the food for thought guys
Fishin6061 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2010, 01:04   #10
skip a stone
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: K.C. metro area of MO.
Posts: 629
Quote:
Originally Posted by G33 View Post
All other factors equal, heavier bullets penetrate deeper.
!47 gr XTPs by Hornady are excellent.

Hey G33 I already asked this on another thread, but prob won't get a response so I'll re ask you and see if ya got a answer for me. Do you know of a dependable 147 gr round (hand loads would do) in 357 Sig that would give good repeatable and consistant sub-sonic speeds so I could put a can on a Sig barrel without going the 40/9 conversion route with any of my Glocks in 357 Sig? I've had a real bad experience with a 40/9mm conver. barrel. With the slight differences in deminsions I don't ever want to repeat or risk trying again.

By the way did you do tha digital mod on the cat pic?
skip a stone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2010, 03:06   #11
G33
CLM Number 296
Re-Assigned
 
G33's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: With G29
Posts: 57,779


Quote:
Originally Posted by skip a stone View Post
Hey G33 I already asked this on another thread, but prob won't get a response so I'll re ask you and see if ya got a answer for me. Do you know of a dependable 147 gr round (hand loads would do) in 357 Sig that would give good repeatable and consistant sub-sonic speeds so I could put a can on a Sig barrel without going the 40/9 conversion route with any of my Glocks in 357 Sig? I've had a real bad experience with a 40/9mm conver. barrel. With the slight differences in deminsions I don't ever want to repeat or risk trying again.

By the way did you do tha digital mod on the cat pic?
I use Hornady 147gr XTPs.
Load it down using Lee Book.

Blast made ava for me.
No clue.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.


"I'd wager G would waterboard a salmon."--tous

"...those without swords can still die upon them." --Eowyn
G33 is offline   Reply With Quote

 
  
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 15:13.




Homepage
FAQ
Forums
Calendar
Advertise
Gallery
GT Wiki
GT Blogs
Social Groups
Classifieds


Users Currently Online: 1,301
317 Members
984 Guests

Most users ever online: 2,244
Nov 11, 2013 at 16:42