GlockTalk.com
Home Forums Classifieds Blogs Today's Posts Search Social Groups



  
SIGN-UP
Notices

Glock Talk
Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.

 
  
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-19-2010, 18:23   #21
skippz
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: East Kentucky
Posts: 542
just curious what was the ideal twist everyone was hoping for???
skippz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2010, 19:12   #22
Randolph da man
Senior Member
 
Randolph da man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: 77077
Posts: 1,030
Quote:
Originally Posted by RMTactical View Post
Almost nobody. This rifle went from extremely promising to almost a joke. It could have been big but the price tag and a few other things simply killed it.
yup.
I have no interest in spending that much mula on another 5.56 AR.
I'll stick with my Noveske's
__________________
I have a Big Gun...
a REAL Big Gun... :tongueout:
Randolph da man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2010, 19:21   #23
Blah!
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 1,983
Quote:
Originally Posted by Krigloch View Post
The thing is, WHO is going to actually buy this thing?
Makes no sense.

The .gov will buy it with your money at the exploded prices forged by the Magpul/Cerbus union.
__________________
There is a world of compliance, then there's my world.
Blah! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2010, 20:21   #24
g21owner
Senior Member
 
g21owner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Just outside the USA
Posts: 988
Quote:
Originally Posted by skippz View Post
just curious what was the ideal twist everyone was hoping for???
1 in 7 probably...
__________________
California Glockers Club member #760
Black Rifle Club member #760
Lar Grizzly-15 w/ BCM 16" upper, Glock 21, Taurus Model 85, Type 38 Japanese Arisaka
g21owner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2010, 22:54   #25
Chuck TX
CLM Number 243
Charter Lifetime Member
 
Chuck TX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Republic of Texas
Posts: 6,593
Quote:
Originally Posted by skippz View Post
just curious what was the ideal twist everyone was hoping for???
1/7 twist is generally considered ideal for heavier combat type weighted loads (62gr-77gr, etc.) BUT since Bushmaster typically uses 1/9 twist in their ARs they probably figured they'd just use the same barrels they had already. Which should have made it cost less, but apparently they didn't think so. Guess they believed people would be dumb enough to over pay for an Adaptive Combat Rifle with a 1/9 twist and a fixed stock. Just plain nutty.
__________________
"Come and Take it!" - Texans, October 2, 1835
Chuck TX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2010, 23:18   #26
Javelin
Silver Membership
Got Glock?
 
Javelin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: N. Dallas
Posts: 14,638


Quote:
Originally Posted by Randolph da man View Post
yup.
I have no interest in spending that much mula on another 5.56 AR.
I'll stick with my Noveske's
This.
__________________
Disclaimer: This writer is not a lawyer. This product is meant for entertainment and fan or political fiction purposes only and writer accepts no liability. All material should be considered as infotainment only. Writer does not own any characters, topics or subject matter in this story. Any resemblance to real persons, living or dead is for entertainment only. If rash, irritation, redness, or swelling develops, discontinue reading immediately and consult your physician.
Javelin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2010, 11:37   #27
oem3105
Member
 
oem3105's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 39
Here's Remington's promotion video...before it gets pulled!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dLy3xABAsEc
__________________
Vide Aude Tace
oem3105 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2010, 17:38   #28
humanguerrilla
Senior Member
 
humanguerrilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: the woods
Posts: 3,551
.........

Last edited by humanguerrilla; 01-22-2010 at 08:11..
humanguerrilla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2010, 18:04   #29
Nicoroshi
Avid Shooter
 
Nicoroshi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: The liberal playground
Posts: 1,343
I too was very interested in this when it was the Magpul Masada. Now I can sum up my feelings on it in one word......"Meh!"
__________________
Quote:
The AR is like a prom queen.
The AK is like a biker chick.
Treat each accordingly.
21 Club #150 California Glockers #150 Kalashnikov Klub #150 Black Rifle Club #377
Nicoroshi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2010, 11:24   #30
PlasticGuy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 10,255
I just got back from Shot, and the ACR was the biggest disappointment there. Yes, the design is very intelligent. Yes, it is very modular. However, everything else was bad news.

The Remington version will only be available to military and probably only in select fire.

The Bushmaster version will be the LE and civilian version, and comes with a 1:9 twist M4 (heavy) barrel with no chrome lining. The rep said it does have a "secret coating" in it. I asked if it was a hard coating or a metal treatment like nitriding, and he said he couldn't say, but it was good. I asked, "So it's better than chrome lining, but you can't tell me what it is or why I should believe you?" He just shrugged. Okay. I asked him about the logic of a 1:9" twist, and he just shrugged that one off also. Also, the pricing rumors are correct. The model that everyone will want with the folding stock and railed forend does have an MSRP of over $3000. Finally, they added enough metal up front with the heavy barrel, QD ratchet system, and beefed up forend that it now specs out at 8.25 muzzle heavy pounds.

Rumor at the show was that the MagPul people are pissed off to an epic degree about the whole thing, and that the .308 caliber Masoud will be either produced in house or outside by just about anybody but Remington/Bushmaster. Imagine that. They took a platform with awesome potential and turned it into a white elephant.
__________________
I'd be a better listener if you stopped talking about stupid crap that doesn't matter.
PlasticGuy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2010, 11:37   #31
Daekwan
Colts & Glocks!
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 164
Quote:
Originally Posted by PlasticGuy View Post
I just got back from Shot, and the ACR was the biggest disappointment there. Yes, the design is very intelligent. Yes, it is very modular. However, everything else was bad news.

The Remington version will only be available to military and probably only in select fire.

The Bushmaster version will be the LE and civilian version, and comes with a 1:9 twist M4 (heavy) barrel with no chrome lining. The rep said it does have a "secret coating" in it. I asked if it was a hard coating or a metal treatment like nitriding, and he said he couldn't say, but it was good. I asked, "So it's better than chrome lining, but you can't tell me what it is or why I should believe you?" He just shrugged. Okay. I asked him about the logic of a 1:9" twist, and he just shrugged that one off also. Also, the pricing rumors are correct. The model that everyone will want with the folding stock and railed forend does have an MSRP of over $3000. Finally, they added enough metal up front with the heavy barrel, QD ratchet system, and beefed up forend that it now specs out at 8.25 muzzle heavy pounds.

Rumor at the show was that the MagPul people are pissed off to an epic degree about the whole thing, and that the .308 caliber Masoud will be either produced in house or outside by just about anybody but Remington/Bushmaster. Imagine that. They took a platform with awesome potential and turned it into a white elephant.
Best news I've heard all day!
Daekwan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2010, 12:08   #32
PlasticGuy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 10,255
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daekwan View Post
Best news I've heard all day!
Yeah, but keep in mind that I didn't hear it from MagPul themselves. They were very tight lipped about the ACR project. It was other large vendors who knew the MagPul people personally who told me that information second hand. I would consider it reliable, but it's not directly from the primary source.
__________________
I'd be a better listener if you stopped talking about stupid crap that doesn't matter.
PlasticGuy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2010, 12:27   #33
Glockdude1
CLM Number 185
Federal Member
 
Glockdude1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Beaumont,Texas
Posts: 27,303


$3061 for the "enhanced" version???

__________________
"Some People Are Like Slinkies. They're Not Really Good For Anything, But They Bring a Smile To Your Face When Pushed Down The Stairs."
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
Glockdude1 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2010, 12:48   #34
Chuck TX
CLM Number 243
Charter Lifetime Member
 
Chuck TX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Republic of Texas
Posts: 6,593
Quote:
Rumor at the show was that the MagPul people are pissed off to an epic degree about the whole thing, and that the .308 caliber Masoud will be either produced in house or outside by just about anybody but Remington/Bushmaster. Imagine that. They took a platform with awesome potential and turned it into a white elephant.
That's what I've been wondering. Most folks have been quite fond of Magpul to at least some degree, but they certainly took a massive hit with this debacle. Why they chose a company that did the same thing to a 308 AR is beyond me. Hell, even if they'd given it to Oly the specs would still suck, but at least they could have done it for under the claimed price point.

That's the thing with the whole ordeal. If they had built it with mo better specs they could have gotten away with a somewhat higher price, or if they'd hit the price point they could have Bushmastered a spec or two. They doubled the price point and Bushmastered the crap out of the specs, and two wrongs don't make a right.

A 308 ACR would be sweet if they could do it properly and actually hit a determined price point.
__________________
"Come and Take it!" - Texans, October 2, 1835
Chuck TX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2010, 12:54   #35
PlasticGuy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 10,255
Quote:
Originally Posted by Glockdude1 View Post
$3061 for the "enhanced" version???
That's what Bushmaster told me yesterday at SHOT. Dealer price is high enough that the good version can't sell for less than about $2800 on the open market. The "base model" might actually retail for about the same price as a SCAR ($2500 or so), but it won't have a railed forend or folding/adjustable stock. Remington/Bushmaster have lost their minds. Unless they nail a big government contract, they'll wind up with a huge warehouse full of overpriced ACR's within a few months of release.
__________________
I'd be a better listener if you stopped talking about stupid crap that doesn't matter.
PlasticGuy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2010, 13:58   #36
CW Mock
Senior Member
 
CW Mock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,869
They must be out of their collective minds.

I'm LEO, so I can offer some perspective there ... not a cop I know can afford something in that price range, and 99% of us are not allowed or don't need select fire ... so there goes the Remington version. And then when you consider BOTH of them, or the ACR in general are unproven, heavy rifles, why would we buy one? A cop doesn't make much, and for half the price of an ACR, the same cop can get a great AR and great optic. The ACR looks like it comes with a set of cheap Magpul BUIS.

I thought the original Masada design didn't have a quad rail forend, but a more standard one you could attach rails as needed to. What happened there, and how did a plastic and alloy rifle somehow manage to end up approaching the weight of my M14?

Wow. The Remington is priced way too high for cops, and the military for general use and issue, and the Bushmaster is heavy and offers stupid things like 1/9 barrels. Plus you pay over 3k for a folding stock version, rails and a nifty flash hider?

What an insult. Shame on Magpul for selling out on their original design to "Freedom Group" or WTF ever they are this year. Somebody up there needs to lay off the crack pipe, and realize they are charging above premium for an unproven, bastardized piston rifle in a market loaded with them, and that the current champ, the AR15 is not going to be even remotely threatened by their product as is. Hell, right now I am not even sure it gives the FN-SCAR or HK-416 much to worry about.

Maybe if that "thing" they call the ACR was anything like Masada Magpul hyped, I would buy one. A 12-1500 dollar, truly adaptable combat rifle would be something to be reckoned with.
CW Mock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2010, 16:40   #37
deMontacute
NRA Member
 
deMontacute's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 2,162
Send a message via Yahoo to deMontacute
Quote:
Originally Posted by CW Mock View Post
They must be out of their collective minds.

I'm LEO, so I can offer some perspective there ... not a cop I know can afford something in that price range, and 99% of us are not allowed or don't need select fire ... so there goes the Remington version. And then when you consider BOTH of them, or the ACR in general are unproven, heavy rifles, why would we buy one? A cop doesn't make much, and for half the price of an ACR, the same cop can get a great AR and great optic. The ACR looks like it comes with a set of cheap Magpul BUIS.

I thought the original Masada design didn't have a quad rail forend, but a more standard one you could attach rails as needed to. What happened there, and how did a plastic and alloy rifle somehow manage to end up approaching the weight of my M14?

Wow. The Remington is priced way too high for cops, and the military for general use and issue, and the Bushmaster is heavy and offers stupid things like 1/9 barrels. Plus you pay over 3k for a folding stock version, rails and a nifty flash hider?

What an insult. Shame on Magpul for selling out on their original design to "Freedom Group" or WTF ever they are this year. Somebody up there needs to lay off the crack pipe, and realize they are charging above premium for an unproven, bastardized piston rifle in a market loaded with them, and that the current champ, the AR15 is not going to be even remotely threatened by their product as is. Hell, right now I am not even sure it gives the FN-SCAR or HK-416 much to worry about.

Maybe if that "thing" they call the ACR was anything like Masada Magpul hyped, I would buy one. A 12-1500 dollar, truly adaptable combat rifle would be something to be reckoned with.
I suspect that was what Cerberus was aiming for. My theory is that Cerberus placed the price so high so that they would not compete with their Bushmaster AR offerings. "Shrubhamster" is still an AR company, and I think they deliberately did this because they did not want the ACR diminishing their primary market.

Its a stupid, bad business decision, but I suspect the above (in addition to tooling costs and R&D) had something to do with it.
__________________
"...but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end, for they do so with the approval of their own conscience." C. S. Lewis
"Don't you know there ain't no devil, there's just God when he's drunk." - Tom Waits
Kalashnikov Klub #723 Black Rifle Club #723
deMontacute is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2010, 17:43   #38
CW Mock
Senior Member
 
CW Mock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,869
I was talking with a guy the other day, and he mentioned something along the lines of:

Cerberus/Freedom Group sees the plans and prototype of the Masada, and promptly buys it in order to keep the thing from ever effectively being marketed, therefor protecting the Bushmaster AR line from competition. He felt that the company was probably afraid of a plastic rifle that was cheaper and and more reliable than an AR. No proof the ACR is, but yeah, he tends to play these types of scenarios out for fun. Your post reminded me of that.

Whatever the reason, they are collectively insane.
CW Mock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2010, 21:06   #39
Javelin
Silver Membership
Got Glock?
 
Javelin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: N. Dallas
Posts: 14,638


Quote:
Originally Posted by Glockdude1 View Post
$3061 for the "enhanced" version???

Hitler just found out about it too.

__________________
Disclaimer: This writer is not a lawyer. This product is meant for entertainment and fan or political fiction purposes only and writer accepts no liability. All material should be considered as infotainment only. Writer does not own any characters, topics or subject matter in this story. Any resemblance to real persons, living or dead is for entertainment only. If rash, irritation, redness, or swelling develops, discontinue reading immediately and consult your physician.
Javelin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2010, 21:21   #40
AK_Stick
AAAMAD
 
AK_Stick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Alaska, again (for now)
Posts: 20,843
Send a message via AIM to AK_Stick Send a message via Yahoo to AK_Stick
Quote:
Originally Posted by deMontacute View Post
I suspect that was what Cerberus was aiming for. My theory is that Cerberus placed the price so high so that they would not compete with their Bushmaster AR offerings. "Shrubhamster" is still an AR company, and I think they deliberately did this because they did not want the ACR diminishing their primary market.

Its a stupid, bad business decision, but I suspect the above (in addition to tooling costs and R&D) had something to do with it.

I doubt that very much.

Cerberus, exists only to make money. Done right, the ACR may have been the new rifle to replace the AR. Being that only bushhampster can make it. It would have sold like hot cakes. Even at 2K for the enhanced, it would sell like hot cakes. Hell I would have money down at my dealer for two before they hit the streets.


They took a good design, and gave it to Bush hampster. That was the problem, this wasn't intentional pricing out of the market to sell AR's this was sheer stupidity.
__________________
Quote:
Thomas Paine:

"If there must be trouble, let it be in my day, that my children may have peace"
AK_Stick is offline   Reply With Quote

 
  
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:50.




Homepage
FAQ
Forums
Calendar
Advertise
Gallery
GT Wiki
GT Blogs
Social Groups
Classifieds


Users Currently Online: 567
134 Members
433 Guests

Most users ever online: 2,672
Aug 11, 2014 at 2:31