Glock Talk Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.
 |
01-26-2010, 11:22
|
#1
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 160
|
.460 Rowland
I am just now learning about the 1911 conversion available in the .460 Rowland cartridge. Would appreciate any comments on anyone who has one of the Clarke drop-in conversion. Also has anyone tried one of the conversions offered by Wild West Gun for the Springfield and S&W MP?
This cartridge really smokes the 10mm.
Thanks,
whitewater
|
|
|
01-26-2010, 13:51
|
#2
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Smallville
Posts: 4,836
|
I'd much rather buy a good .44mag wheelgun as opposed to spending as much if not more, to attempt .44mag ballistics from a 1911, not to mention ammo cost and availibility vs. the .44mag!! When "conversions" are this expensive I tend to lose interest quickly. Then again, what game would you take with a .460 that couldnt be acheived with the 10mm or .45Super, with the right load??
|
|
|
');
document.write(' ');
};
//-->
01-26-2010, 14:20
|
#3
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 174
|
Yeah, a 4" 44 Mag and a speed loader beat this conversion on price and ammo availability.
From what I read these guns depend on a compensator heavily. That and mega heavy recoil springs make this unattractive to me.
|
|
|
01-27-2010, 09:22
|
#4
|
|
Go Vols
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Volunteer State
Posts: 1,325
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by .45Super-Man
I'd much rather buy a good .44mag wheelgun as opposed to spending as much if not more, to attempt .44mag ballistics from a 1911, not to mention ammo cost and availibility vs. the .44mag!! When "conversions" are this expensive I tend to lose interest quickly. Then again, what game would you take with a .460 that couldnt be acheived with the 10mm or .45Super, with the right load??
|
Exactly what did this post have to do with the OP's question? He asked for anyone with knowledge of the .460 conversion, not for your lack of interest in it.
__________________
"We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid."
BF
|
|
|
01-27-2010, 10:40
|
#5
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 160
|
.460 Rowland
Thanks BleedNOrange for your comment!
The Drop- In Conversion only cost $250 and that is from Clarke Guns, which as far as I know has a very good reputation. If I am not mistaken, Jerry Miculek is one of the owners and is or was married to a Clarke daughter.
The ballistics of a .460 Rowland match and even exceed those of a .44 Magnum. I was just interested in comments from someone who had first hand knowledge of this round and in particular with this pretty inexpensive Drop-In Conversion available from Clarke.
Thanks,
whitewater
|
|
|
01-27-2010, 10:44
|
#6
|
|
Lifetime Membership
Shiny Member
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Just another ball of mud.
Posts: 3,236
|
I have the 460 conversion in my Kimber Warrior and Clark recently cut the cylinder of my 625 to match.
My dentist bought a Kimber straight from Clark already set up for the hoghammer. He bowhunts and the 357Sig wasn't up to his expectations finishing of big pigs.
I reload so the ammo isn't too pricey.
The recoil and muzzle blast are right up there with the 44, so is the accuracy. Win, win situation.
I did have to have the comp pinned and welded due to silly California assault weapons laws. Phooey.
__________________
Hey, I've been in a firefight before!
Well, I was in a fire.
Actually, I was fired from a fry-cook opportunity.
|
|
|
01-27-2010, 13:31
|
#7
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 160
|
.460 Rowland
TKM,
Thanks! This was the kind of input I was looking for. Think I am sold on this drop-in. Now I just have to go find a 1911.
whitewater
|
|
|
01-27-2010, 13:54
|
#8
|
|
Lifetime Membership
Shiny Member
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Just another ball of mud.
Posts: 3,236
|
Glad I could help.
Check Clarks website for a list of recommended models.
Some pistols will not stand up to the increased everything.
A .44Mag level upgrade for the price of a .22 is a pretty good deal.
__________________
Hey, I've been in a firefight before!
Well, I was in a fire.
Actually, I was fired from a fry-cook opportunity.
|
|
|
01-27-2010, 16:03
|
#9
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Smallville
Posts: 4,836
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BleedNOrange
Exactly what did this post have to do with the OP's question? He asked for anyone with knowledge of the .460 conversion, not for your lack of interest in it.
|
What does my opinion have to do with your desire to play "hall monitor"...
|
|
|
01-28-2010, 07:27
|
#10
|
|
Go Vols
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Volunteer State
Posts: 1,325
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by .45Super-Man
What does my opinion have to do with your desire to play "hall monitor"... 
|
Nothing really, just that your opinion had nothing to do with the OP's question. Hey aren't you the guy that scoffs at "turbo charging" 9mm's but yet advocates 45 super....hmmm kinda funny
__________________
"We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid."
BF
|
|
|
01-28-2010, 15:40
|
#11
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Smallville
Posts: 4,836
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BleedNOrange
Nothing really, just that your opinion had nothing to do with the OP's question. Hey aren't you the guy that scoffs at "turbo charging" 9mm's but yet advocates 45 super....hmmm kinda funny 
|
The .45acp is loaded to very low pressures and a dramatic improvement can be made to it's ballistics by beefing things up to more "modern" performance levels. The .45Super only develops about 25,000 psi which is still FAR below the 9mm,.40,etc. Attempting to "turbo charge" the 9mm, which is already at about 35-36,000 psi IS a different matter altogether. There...make sense now??
Last edited by .45Super-Man; 01-28-2010 at 15:42..
|
|
|
01-28-2010, 15:50
|
#12
|
|
10mm defender
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: J-Ville NC
Posts: 3,515
|
The .45-08 might be an alternative for the OP. All you need is to cut .308 brass and an aftermarket BBL. It's a step up from .45 sup, not quite the Rowland, nor the hassle or expense.
__________________
- Without idiots, there would be no baseline for common sense.
- "Our country went through a transition during the last election where the parasites came together and outnumbered the hosts." -jdavionic
|
|
|
01-28-2010, 19:55
|
#13
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Anchorage, AK, USA
Posts: 3,634
|
I don't have any personal direct experience with the .460 Rowland. But, I thought that the OP might like to know that Mech Tec makes a cool unit that converts a pistol into a totally legit rifle. And, they offer it in .460 Rowland.
TED
|
|
|
01-28-2010, 22:10
|
#14
|
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 21
|
I would suggest a fully supported chamber on your handguns barrel, Para-Ordnances will accept Clarks after-market kit for it. My friend got one of them for his Para, he enjoys shooting it...but , he can't help but wonder how much he is beating up the frame every mag full. He has changed the recoil spring to as stiff as practical, ( wear those safety glasses during assm./dis-assm., if that spring gets loose it FLYS ! )Certainly a hot friggin' round.
FYI here is some reload data... http://www.realguns.com/loads/460Rowland.htm
|
|
|
02-03-2010, 22:02
|
#15
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 9
|
I have the kit from CCG on my Dan Wesson Pointman 7. It is fun to shoot and I reload so the ammo has not been to bad. I only have really run about 100 rounds through so far. The only pain is chasing down the brass. It is super accurate and the recoil is definitely different. A snap backwards instead of up.
I wanted a hot shooting gun in a 1911 and I think I got what I asked for without buying a 10mm and the dies for reloading. I already had the 45acp dies. The first picture is 9 rounds 35'.

|
|
|
|
Sponsored Links
|
Advertisement
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 19:04.
|
|
|