GlockTalk.com
Home Forums Classifieds Blogs Today's Posts Search Social Groups



  
SIGN-UP
Notices

Glock Talk
Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.

 
  
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-16-2010, 09:14   #1
Manzoli7
Member
 
Manzoli7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 74
Striker fired vs 1911

I was wondering in court what the difference between a striker fired gun and a cocked 1911 would be?

1) A Glock is partially cocked inside but has multiple safeties.

2) A cocked and locked 1911 has a lighter trigger pull and is completely cocked and has multiple safties.

3) How would new Taurus pistols like the "Slim" that are SA/DA (single on the first shot and only reverts to double action if the primer does not ignite) would the prosecuting attorney say these are hair trigger guns? Or because you canít see the striker and they are plastic framed the jury would see them as soft cuddly warm and caring guns?
Manzoli7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2010, 06:23   #2
Mas Ayoob
KoolAidAntidote
 
Mas Ayoob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,060
Manzoli7, good luck with finding a warm fuzzy gun that won't frighten jurors unfamiliar with weapons. Given that you wouldn't be in court if you hadn't used the gun to wound or kill someone, and all...

I doubt that many jurors would care about the difference between striker-fired and hammer-fired design. What happens is that a prosecutor desperate for conviction or a plaintiff's lawyer hungry for money knows that justifiable self-defense is a hard argument for them to overcome in court. However, since there is no such thing as a "justifiable accident," a theory of you accidentally/negligently discharging the weapon can lead more easily to a manslaughter conviction or a wrongful death judgment. That is why the argument that you accidentally discharged due to a negligently-chosen "hair trigger" is so attractive to them.

What is "too light a trigger" will be determined by manufacturer specifications, industry standards, and what is called "the mainstream of common custom and practice." These things have evolved differently with different firearms.

Glock has ALWAYS forbidden the 3.5/4.5 pound connector for "duty use," unless combined with the NY-1 module, which brings total pull weight up into the six-pound range. Their standard 5.5-pound pull would be seen as the minimum "safe" trigger system for holding suspects at gunpoint with this weapon. Many departments and individuals (myself included) prefer standard 5.5-pound connector PLUS NY-1 for a total pull weight in the 7.5-8 pound range, which makes it even harder for opposing counsel to sell a "hair trigger" argument to a jury.

As the 1911 has evolved over the years, a combination of the specs of most of its many manufacturers, plus such things as NRA's rule of a minimum 4-lb pull for duty gun (Distinguished, President's Hundred) matches, has led to a general acceptance of 4.0 pounds as the minimum "safe" pull for a defensive 1911.

The Taurus system you describe is too new for "common custom and practice" standards to develop around it, so the Court would probably look to Taurus' factory specs for trigger pull weight.

best,
Mas
Mas Ayoob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2010, 11:31   #3
Manzoli7
Member
 
Manzoli7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 74
Thanks for the info.

Thanks for the info. Maybe a cutumized cgun with Barney the purple prehistoric creature on the side would be good. Just kiding.
Manzoli7 is offline   Reply With Quote

 
  
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:00.




Homepage
FAQ
Forums
Calendar
Advertise
Gallery
GT Wiki
GT Blogs
Social Groups
Classifieds


Users Currently Online: 754
137 Members
617 Guests

Most users ever online: 2,244
Nov 11, 2013 at 16:42