GlockTalk.com
Home Forums Classifieds Blogs Today's Posts Search Social Groups



  
SIGN-UP
Notices

Glock Talk
Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-16-2010, 20:06   #1
thegriz18
Paper Killer
 
thegriz18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Friend Zone
Posts: 3,188
Remington Express 155 grain JHP .40 S&W

I have been looking into this load and can't seem to find any data on it other than "USBP used it and it was lights out good." Has anyone done or come across any penetration and expansion testing for it? How is the muzzle flash, etc... Also, I can't seem to find it anywhere for less than $42 a box of 50. Any idea why this ammo is more expensive than premium ammo?

Thanks
__________________
‘‘To preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of people always possess arms, and be taught alike, especially when young, how to use them...’’
— Richard Henry Lee, 1787
thegriz18 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2010, 21:34   #2
Mwinter
I'm MilkMan Dan
 
Mwinter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,483
I got several boxes of it from a USBP inspector years ago...not to my liking.

Very pronounced blast/recoil, and very bright/large muzzle flash. That, along with the non-bonded bullet left "free" and "it went bang" as it's only redeeming features. I'd take a Gold Dot in any weight over that load. USBP/ICE tests I've seen favor shallower penetration than the FBI, and use temp cav as a factor in determining performance.

Most of the Remington .40cal loads I've tested had bright, sparky muzzle flash, and several did not perform as well as competing offerings from Federal, Speer and Winchester.

My fav thus far (but definitely pricey and relatively tough to find) is the Federal Bonded Tactical in 165gr. Very low muzzle flash, soft perceived recoil, and excellent barrier performance.
__________________
Singled out, and called to arms to defend what they hold dearest, the number of truly evil people would be small. The number of truly good people, even smaller....those too afraid, too weak or too ill-prepared to fight would be countless.
Mwinter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2010, 22:29   #3
thegriz18
Paper Killer
 
thegriz18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Friend Zone
Posts: 3,188
Was the flash blinding? How was penetration and expansion?
__________________
‘‘To preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of people always possess arms, and be taught alike, especially when young, how to use them...’’
— Richard Henry Lee, 1787
thegriz18 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2010, 12:29   #4
fastbolt
Senior Member
 
fastbolt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Within the lightning (Northern CA)
Posts: 8,214
While that fed agency did use millions of rounds of that load, it was hard on their guns.

They eventually decided that an even better load would use a lighter weight, in the 135gr range, but one loaded to a lesser velocity than what is typically favored by internet firearms enthusiasts.

A Winchester LE rep tole me some years ago that the 155gr load used by Customs was the primary reason they developed their standard 155gr JHP Ranger load, so they could compete for a piece of that fed pie. Then, several years later it turns out they got the contract for the new & improved lightweight 135gr .40 load the agency came to favor better.

http://glocktalk.com/forums/showthre...stoms+ICE+load

Stay tuned for the "Next Big Thing" in that agency's lightweight .40 loads somewhere down the road ...

There's been some amount of this bullet weight .40 load being dumped on the commercial market in recent years.

I remember when the 155gr load was first starting to become popular. I tired some Federal and Winchester (STHP version), as well as a couple of the lighter loads made by a couple of other makers. I never cared for the increased muzzle blast/flash or the increased felt recoil, myself.
__________________
Sub Club #9; .40 S&W Club #1953; S&W Club #3913
Retired LE - firearms instructor/armorer
fastbolt is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:51.



Homepage
FAQ
Forums
Calendar
Advertise
Gallery
GT Wiki
GT Blogs
Social Groups
Classifieds


Users Currently Online: 1,284
537 Members
747 Guests

Most users ever online: 5,723
Apr 16, 2009 at 11:36