GlockTalk.com
Home Forums Classifieds Blogs Today's Posts Search Social Groups



  
SIGN-UP
Notices

Glock Talk
Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.

 
  
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-21-2010, 21:16   #1
glock2740
Gun lover.
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: NW Ark.
Posts: 18,905
Anyone tried the Barnes TAC-XP loads yet?

I know, this isn't Caliber Corner, but I posted it here, because the question pertains ONLY to 1911 guns. I got an e-mail from Double Tap today about these loads. 160gr TAC-XP. The ballistics are truly amazing out of a 5" 1911 and I'm sure it would be a real doozy of a SD load out any length barrel to tell you truth. Just wondering how it feeds? I'm a big Gold Dot fan, and have enough of them, that I doubt I switch, but I certainly want to look into these. And if anyone else has tried them, let's hear what you think.
glock2740 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2010, 21:19   #2
glock2740
Gun lover.
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: NW Ark.
Posts: 18,905
Here's the info they sent me.

http://www.doubletapammo.com/php/cat...roducts_id=440
glock2740 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2010, 21:47   #3
Ruggles
Senior Member
 
Ruggles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Tejas
Posts: 8,902
Well that is a nice looking set of ballistics. Seems to be a nice round, no hands on here but I would like to try it out!
Ruggles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2010, 22:10   #4
BOGE
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Posts: 5,555
Tried it out on what?
BOGE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2010, 04:57   #5
drc767
Navy CSAR
 
drc767's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 2,492
I used to buy quite a bit of DT loadings. For some reason, they started having some very serious quality control issues. I have found their velocities to be all over the map and the OAL's varried enough that some rounds would not even chamber in my .38 Super 1911's. I also had some .38 Super stuff that had some pretty bad primer flow issues, so much so that I send Mike pictures and he sent me replacements, even though they had the same issues. I got to the point where I have lost confidence in them. I just cannot take a chance with having a round fail to chamber when I need it the most. I still have a bunch of their 10mm stuff and will use it up, but I will not buy anymore ammo from them for a while. As far as the Barnes loads, the Barnes TAC-XP is a good bullet that always runs along the lines of low on weight/high in velocity. They retain their weights very well and have consistant expansion. They are also good for barrier penetration. The only downside could be feeding issues because of the very aggressive hollow point design. I would make sure there are no feeding issues with the pistol you intend to use them in. I prefer 230 loadings in my 1911's, but that is certainly a personal preferrence.

Last edited by drc767; 06-22-2010 at 04:59..
drc767 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2010, 07:57   #6
glock2740
Gun lover.
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: NW Ark.
Posts: 18,905
Yeah, I have heard that the DT QC is starting to slip. I have a bunch of their older 10mm stuff and a few boxes of .380 ammo. All of that has been top notch, but I have seen some people complaining about quality, or lack thereof, lately on here. That .45 load sounds pretty nasty though. But if it doesn't perform consistently or feed 100% of the time, then I won't be getting any. Especially at that price. I can get 100 rounds of Gold Dot for not much more than that.
glock2740 is offline   Reply With Quote

 
  
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:09.




Homepage
FAQ
Forums
Calendar
Advertise
Gallery
GT Wiki
GT Blogs
Social Groups
Classifieds


Users Currently Online: 786
188 Members
598 Guests

Most users ever online: 2,244
Nov 11, 2013 at 16:42