Important Notice: The site is currently being upgraded to a new software system. This process could take a day or two to complete. During that time, we are going to leave the site up here, on its old software. WHAT GETS POSTED HERE DURING THIS TRANSITION WILL NOT BE COPIED OVER ONTO THE NEW SITE, WHEN THE UPGRADE IS COMPLETE. When we swap over, the content posted while this message is visible will be lost. We wanted to give you folks a place to hang out and talk while we worked though. We will let you know when we are finished. Please pardon the inconvenience, during this transition.

Home Forums Classifieds GT Store Blogs Today's Posts Search Social Groups


Glock Talk
Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.

Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-23-2010, 21:30   #1
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: ne ohio
Posts: 2,821
357 sig GD standard vs LE

i see that the bullets are different for the 357 sig and the 357 sig LE. i know the LE is suposed to be about 25 fps faster but that shouldn't require a different bullet. the only thing i can think of is the more requirement for penetration on the LE round. on pics that i have seen the 5 petals on the standard round seem more extended than the 6 petals on the LE round when shot into balistic gel. the LE round petals look rolled back. it looks as if the standard round may be a better sd round for ccw. any info on these from those in the know will be appreciated.
1canvas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2010, 07:14   #2
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 15,899
Is this what you're referring to?

Two part numbers, 54234 and 53918 (or 23918 for boxes of 20), are currently available. Before the change in 1999, the only difference between them was that 54234 was mouth sealed. During the upgrade, it was decided that both should be mouth sealed to prevent bullet movement in the bottleneck case. At the same time, two new hollow point cavities were designed. The hollow point for 54234 was designed to duplicate the expansion and penetration characteristics of the original style, while 53918 was designed to decrease penetration by one to two inches. In order to make recoil more manageable, the powder charge in 53918 was reduced by 0.2 grains, resulting in an average velocity drop of 25 feet per second.
cowboy1964 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2010, 15:16   #3
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: ne ohio
Posts: 2,821
thanks, thats was just what i was looking for.
1canvas is offline   Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 18:05.

GT Wiki
GT Blogs
Social Groups
GT Store

Users Currently Online: 1,144
271 Members
873 Guests

Most users ever online: 4,867
May 19, 2015 at 1:03