Important Notice: The site is currently being upgraded to a new software system. This process could take a day or two to complete. During that time, we are going to leave the site up here, on its old software. WHAT GETS POSTED HERE DURING THIS TRANSITION WILL NOT BE COPIED OVER ONTO THE NEW SITE, WHEN THE UPGRADE IS COMPLETE. When we swap over, the content posted while this message is visible will be lost. We wanted to give you folks a place to hang out and talk while we worked though. We will let you know when we are finished. Please pardon the inconvenience, during this transition.

Home Forums Classifieds GT Store Blogs Today's Posts Search Social Groups


Glock Talk
Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.

Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-24-2010, 14:33   #1
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 180

For nighttime carry, I outfit my G19 with a TLR-3 and carry it IWB (in addition to a Surefire E2 in my back pocket). I don't necessarily think that a weaponlight is a necessity but if a situation were to occur, I'd rather be over-equipped/prepared than under.

Are you familiar with any cases where carrying a weapon-mounted light boded poorly in the courtroom after an incident?

AaronZR2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2010, 22:04   #2
Mas Ayoob
Mas Ayoob's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,473
Haven't run across any such cases yet. (Doesn't mean they haven't happened; just means I haven't run across 'em.) The gun-mounted light is still fairly uncommon in CCW, though we'll see more of it as the lights get smaller and the concealed carry holsters catch up with that design concept, both of which are already happening.

Two informed predictions, though...

First, expect a lawyer who has to manufacture a case to come up with the same BS we saw with night sights and laser sights already: "Ninja assassin of the night, blah-blah..." My prediction: a good lawyer and a gun-competent defendant will employ expert testimony and/or material witness testimony from defendant's trainers to destroy that false assertion and show that paying extra in both money and inconvenience allowed the shooter to have equpment that guaranteed he wouldn't mis-identify a threat in the dark and shoot the wrong person. In short, the defense ends up showing the defendant was highly cautious and responsible, and far from negligent or malicious.

Second, expect a test case in which someone used the gun mounted flashlight as an illumination tool instead of a lethal weapon and "muzzled" someone at whom he had no right to point a loaded gun. (Felony aggravated assault charge, and all of that.) Do like the cops: when you carry a gun with a mounted flashlight, reserve it for high danger situations and ALSO CARRY A REGULAR, SEPARATE FLASHLIGHT for routine search, identification, etc.

We'll see what happens when the first test case rears its head. In the meantime, if you use it cautiously and reasonably, I certainly wouldn't see a problem with it.

Mas Ayoob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2010, 01:20   #3
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 180
I have both night and laser sights so I guess I'm triple the ninja assassin

Thanks for the info!
AaronZR2 is offline   Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:25.

GT Wiki
GT Blogs
Social Groups
GT Store

Users Currently Online: 793
211 Members
582 Guests

Most users ever online: 4,867
May 19, 2015 at 1:03