Your Next President - Is that a survival topic?

mes228 · 11-16-2011, 06:24

I think it is. As Obama has already shown he is 100% on Wall Street and the Banks side. The people are not going to be "ring fenced" or protected at all. They will be used, their money and assets are being diminished to save the Banks (both here and in Europe). And it seemingly will continue to the bitter end. Why would the real monied people want to change horses? Contrary to Obama's words the Banks have gotten EVERYTHING they even remotely wished for. The Republicans want to replace Obama right? On the radio all the Propagandist from Weiner (Savages real name) to Rush all want Obama to lose don't they? They're all on the same page. Well some pretty bright people think it's a con job.

http://lewrockwell.com/kwiatkowski/kwiatkowski278.html

I agree it's a con job. Caveat - I'm no political guru, nor a prophet and it's just my opinion. However, I think it's remarkable "who" the propagandist are trying to convince conservatives to run. In my opinion the only one that might have a small chance is Ron Paul. And he's given very short shrift in every way. It's McCain all over again. Conservative Candidates chosen for their ability lose.

UneasyRider · 11-16-2011, 06:29

The person who wrote that article is an idiot.

TangoFoxtrot · 11-16-2011, 06:42

Q: Your Next President - Is that a survival topic?

NO! Its a topic for the political issues forum. Too many people are trying to make their political point here on the S/P forum.

ArmoryDoc · 11-16-2011, 07:27

No, not a survival topic.

bdcochran · 11-16-2011, 07:35

Not a survival topic.

Bilbo Bagins · 11-16-2011, 07:40

Seriously, Mess228 have you been kicked out of the Political forum and have no where to spew this stuff.

If it helps you any, you really need to look at what partisianship is and how being so hard core political has led blind followers like yourself to things like camping out with a bunch of socialist, to commiting mass genocide.

There is more to life...please stop listening to the political pundits and LIVE A GOOD LIFE.

However let me throw this at you. This next election SHOULD be a survival topic, and its because of the partisanship that is out there.

I think you will see riots and violence no matter who wins in 2012. There is just too much propanganda BS on both sides.

mes228 · 11-16-2011, 07:43

That person you called an idiot is a CONSERVATIVE and a Libertarian. She is a retired Air Force Colonel. Has an MA from Harvard, a MS from University Of Alaska, and a PHD from Catholic University in Political Science. Was assigned to the Pentagon and has written extensively on Intelligence matters. You may not agree with her assessment. But I think it's idiocy to call her an idiot.

There's people on this board that will tolerate nothing but their brand of media directed conservatism. I guess my point is you can be a conservative and not be a brain dead sycophant for propagandist on the radio. Seems clear to me at this point that the Republicans MAY be trying to lose the next election. My guess is those at the top feel it's too late to avoid a world wide financial mess. Who better to take the fall and the blame than a Democrat?

cowboy1964 · 11-16-2011, 10:38

Anyone that thinks Ron Paul is the most electable candidate is just a loon. Make that a double-loon, since they are probably a rabid supporter of his as well.

sebecman · 11-16-2011, 10:55

Quote:

Originally Posted by mes228

That person you called an idiot is a CONSERVATIVE and a Libertarian. She is a retired Air Force Colonel. Has an MA from Harvard, a MS from University Of Alaska, and a PHD from Catholic University in Political Science. Was assigned to the Pentagon and has written extensively on Intelligence matters. You may not agree with her assessment. But I think it's idiocy to call her an idiot.

There's people on this board that will tolerate nothing but their brand of media directed conservatism. I guess my point is you can be a conservative and not be a brain dead sycophant for propagandist on the radio. Seems clear to me at this point that the Republicans MAY be trying to lose the next election. My guess is those at the top feel it's too late to avoid a world wide financial mess. Who better to take the fall and the blame than a Democrat?

Idiocy is a matter of prespective.

That said, you can call ANYTHING S+P related and argue a case for it until your blue in the face, doesn't make it valid...but this post clearly belongs in the political forum and I think you know that.

mes228 · 11-16-2011, 11:44

Mod, please move this to the Political Forum if you wish. The brainwashed sycophant contingent here, masquerading as conservatives, can't stand anything different. They demand everyone believe as they do. Just fake conservative Taliban people that demand all conservatives walk lock step with them as they walk lock step with the shills on radio.

They demand that everyone think Cain can be elected. Simply because their magical radio and propagandist told them to think so. Some probably think Newt can be elected. Even though he took well over a 1.9 million $$$$ in consulting fees from Fredie Mac (looks nearly as bad as the bonuses they gave out). And a few years ago he was polled as the most hated man in Washington. As for Mitt, I question if a Mormon can capture the mainstream Christian vote. Perry has been made to appear totally incompetent, and maybe he really is. Is it so far fetched to think anyone chosen in this group only increases the odds that Obama is reelected? I don't think the nation can endure four more years of Obama and the rule of Wall Street. Some Banks and Wall Street types may survive. I'm not so sure about those that are convinced the radio host would never mislead them. Just a thought.

TangoFoxtrot · 11-16-2011, 11:55

I think Mes228 needs some R&R time in the tranquility of Alaska, maybe with Sara Palin.

TangoFoxtrot · 11-16-2011, 11:56

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bilbo Bagins

Seriously, Mess228 have you been kicked out of the Political forum and have no where to spew this stuff.

If it helps you any, you really need to look at what partisianship is and how being so hard core political has led blind followers like yourself to things like camping out with a bunch of socialist, to commiting mass genocide.

There is more to life...please stop listening to the political pundits and LIVE A GOOD LIFE.

However let me throw this at you. This next election SHOULD be a survival topic, and its because of the partisanship that is out there.

I think you will see riots and violence no matter who wins in 2012. There is just too much propanganda BS on both sides.

Well stated Mr Bagins, even though your a puke Tea Party idiot...just kidding

DoctaGlockta · 11-16-2011, 12:27

If our next president is Hu Jintao, Vlad Putin, or Kim Jung-il then yes it is.

mes228 · 11-16-2011, 12:55

Mod, if you wish lock/remove this thread as we will live to see if many conservatives have been duped next election.

Glock30Eric · 11-16-2011, 13:04

I have started a thread about it. It is locked. I have moved on.

http://glocktalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1380717

Dexters · 11-16-2011, 14:55

Quote:

Originally Posted by bdcochran

not a survival topic.

+1...

Bilbo Bagins · 11-17-2011, 07:39

Quote:

Originally Posted by mes228

That person you called an idiot is a CONSERVATIVE and a Libertarian. She is a retired Air Force Colonel. Has an MA from Harvard, a MS from University Of Alaska, and a PHD from Catholic University in Political Science. Was assigned to the Pentagon and has written extensively on Intelligence matters. You may not agree with her assessment. But I think it's idiocy to call her an idiot.

There's people on this board that will tolerate nothing but their brand of media directed conservatism. I guess my point is you can be a conservative and not be a brain dead sycophant for propagandist on the radio. Seems clear to me at this point that the Republicans MAY be trying to lose the next election. My guess is those at the top feel it's too late to avoid a world wide financial mess. Who better to take the fall and the blame than a Democrat?

For the record Nutnfancy is also a retired Air Force Colonel

UneasyRider · 11-17-2011, 08:37

Quote:

Originally Posted by mes228

That person you called an idiot is a CONSERVATIVE and a Libertarian. She is a retired Air Force Colonel. Has an MA from Harvard, a MS from University Of Alaska, and a PHD from Catholic University in Political Science. Was assigned to the Pentagon and has written extensively on Intelligence matters. You may not agree with her assessment. But I think it's idiocy to call her an idiot.

There's people on this board that will tolerate nothing but their brand of media directed conservatism. I guess my point is you can be a conservative and not be a brain dead sycophant for propagandist on the radio. Seems clear to me at this point that the Republicans MAY be trying to lose the next election. My guess is those at the top feel it's too late to avoid a world wide financial mess. Who better to take the fall and the blame than a Democrat?

Quote:

An idiot, dolt, or dullard is a mentally deficient person, or someone who acts in a self-defeating or significantly counterproductive way. Archaically the word mome has also been used. The similar terms moron, imbecile, and cretin have all gained specialized meanings in modern times. An idiot is said to be idiotic, and to suffer from idiocy. A dunce is an idiot who is specifically incapable of learning. An idiot differs from a fool (who is unwise) and an ignoramus (who is uneducated/an ignorant), neither of which refers to someone with low intelligence.

I am the one who called her an idiot and that is how I see it. And yes I am one of those guys who sees right and wrong, good and evil, smart or stupid all on my own terms, no help required. If you like her argument then defend it, or you could just say that she went to better colleges, had a better military career, or whatever.