Glock Talk Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.
 |
|
10-17-2010, 11:28
|
#1
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 4,072
|
The forged vs cast thing is driving me up the wall
I can't get a straight answer. I am saving up some dough for a 1911 and I figure a thousand or so should do it.
But I can't seem to get an answer whether or not a cast frame is going to be inferior, or if forged is better. It seems people say a good cast can be good, but will never touch forged.
So now I am looking at Sig Sauer's offerings in 1911s, and I thought they were forged. Nope, cast.... apparently. But they're very highly regarded. Same with the STI Trojan, which is supposed to be an amazing gun. Cast frame.
So then people will say, "Well there you go, great guns use cast." But if you go up the STI ladder, they start becoming forged frames, which makes me believe that the casting was a budget alternative and is used to keep cost down (at the expense of strength/quality).
Then Caspian, a not cheap 1911 frame, is cast. So are most Dan Wessons, which again, aren't cheap. Hell, many competition 1911s, that see high round counts, are cast.
But you can buy a much cheaper Springfield that's forged.
I know I will never shoot as many rounds through this gun as to test the strength of the metal. But it drives me nuts to think the gun may potentially use inferior methods or frame or whatever. Kind of like buying a luxury car and finding out the leather is actually vinyl to cut down on costs, or it has hubcaps.
It seems it would bother me, with what I know now, to spend good money on a cast-frame 1911, not because I worry about its long term reliability but because they 'cut a corner' in making it when others do it 'the right way.'
Somebody set me straight here.
__________________
"Learning to shoot with a Glock is like learning to drive with a car with a smashed windshield and two flat tires."
-Yo
|
|
|
10-17-2010, 11:30
|
#2
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: PA
Posts: 77,868
|
I wouldn't worry about it, quite frankly.
The cast slide is what brings concern.
.
Last edited by bac1023; 10-17-2010 at 11:31..
|
|
|
');
document.write(' ');
};
//-->
10-17-2010, 11:32
|
#3
|
|
Rent this space
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 10,684
|
it's not an issue (just like MIM) if it's made properly.
the before 2009, all Dan Wessons (except for the Valor) were cast.
Reason forged Springfields are less expensive is because they are forged in Brazil.
|
|
|
10-17-2010, 11:39
|
#4
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: PA
Posts: 77,868
|
Sigs I thought were forged.
...or at least I know they were when I bought mine.
|
|
|
10-17-2010, 11:40
|
#5
|
|
Rent this space
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 10,684
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bac1023
Sigs I thought were forged.
...or at least I know they were when I bought mine.
|
weren't teh original Sig's built on Caspian frames before they moved to in-house manufacturing?
|
|
|
10-17-2010, 11:45
|
#6
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: PA
Posts: 77,868
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quack
weren't teh original Sig's built on Caspian frames before they moved to in-house manufacturing?
|
I thought they were the forged Caspians though.
God only knows.
|
|
|
10-17-2010, 11:47
|
#7
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 193
|
Personal experience in the manufacturing field has given me a bias toward forged components, but that same experience has taught me that a good casting can be better than a poor forging.....so there are a lot of variables.
Colt and Wilson Combat both use forgings and the quality of the steel used within these and the heat treatment applied to them seems to receive a lot of accolades in both cases. Then again, I spoke with somebody from Olympic Arms the other day who confirmed with me that both their frames and slides are produced from castings, the latter of which automatically leads me to prop an eyebrow; and yet the Schuetzen Pistol Works has a very good reputation for quality and durability as best as I can tell.
I think the solution is for me to buy a collection of 1911's as large as Bac's making certain that I get a good variety of types of manufacture so I can personally determine how this all works. Now to go tell the wife that this needs to be done for the good of the 1911 community at large......
Last edited by syr74; 10-17-2010 at 11:48..
|
|
|
10-17-2010, 11:50
|
#8
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 4,072
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bac1023
Sigs I thought were forged.
...or at least I know they were when I bought mine.
|
I thought so too, google has brought me to a couple sites that claim they're cast, but nothing solid.
__________________
"Learning to shoot with a Glock is like learning to drive with a car with a smashed windshield and two flat tires."
-Yo
|
|
|
10-17-2010, 11:54
|
#9
|
|
Rent this space
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 10,684
|
i'mm 99% sure that i recall that the Sig/Caspian frames were cast.
|
|
|
10-17-2010, 12:00
|
#10
|
|
Dude here.
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 1,053
|
FWIW, after Browning/FN started making .40 S&W Hi Powers, they started using cast frames over forged. Can't remember if there was a problem with frames or rails cracking. As far as I understand (I'm probably completely wrong) Forging is a bit harder, but more brittle. Cast are a little softer but a little more resilient. I have a Kimber II, and I thought they were forged, but now who knows. Doesn't bother me in the slightest. I don't think a quality 1911 with a cast frame is inferior in any way.
|
|
|
10-17-2010, 12:00
|
#11
|
|
Rent this space
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 10,684
|
Early article (~2004) on the Sig GSR.
http://www.gunweek.com/2004/feature0310.html
Quote:
|
To ensure the fit and finish, Sig Arms uses a cast stainless steel frame and a forged stainless steel slide. The frame is cast to cut down on the required machining to finish the pistol. With the pounding the slide takes, it is forged, since forgings are somewhat stronger than a casting. For what it's worth, IPSC pistols have been built on cast frames for years and endure thousands of rounds; yes, cast frames can take the abuse.
|
Last edited by Quack; 10-17-2010 at 12:02..
|
|
|
10-17-2010, 12:03
|
#12
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: PA
Posts: 77,868
|
That's cool.
Its been said many times that the frames were forged, but that shows you that you can't assume anything.
|
|
|
10-17-2010, 12:04
|
#13
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hampton, Virginia
Posts: 1,614
|
Frankly, unless you plan on putting several hundred thousand rounds through it, I wouldn't worry. For me, my PERSONAL PREFERENCE is forged, as I do anywhere from 1500 to 3000 rounds a month. That said, I've a Safari Arms Matchmaster, forged frame with over 120k rounds without issues, I've also got an Essex cast frame with near the same round count and it's still looking brand new.
If it's well made and maintained, and you don't use over pressured ammo all the time, you shouldn't have an issue either way you go.
LOL, I've also got a Caspian Arms Titanium 1911 frame with almost all titanium parts mated to a Colt Gold Cup National Match stainless slide and I don't think there's enough rounds in the world to wear it down.
__________________
לפעמים אדם מוצא את גורלו על הדרך אותה הוא לקח בכדי להימנע ממנו(Sometimes a man can meet his destiny on the road he took to avoid it)
Last edited by solomansousana; 10-17-2010 at 12:05..
|
|
|
10-17-2010, 12:29
|
#14
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Somewhere in the air.
Posts: 4,629
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quack
i'mm 99% sure that i recall that the Sig/Caspian frames were cast.
|
I have an early Sig Sauer Nitron Black 1911 GSR. It has a cast Caspian frame and I like it.
Here's another excellent old review of the Sig 1911 GSR that reflects the build on my gun.
http://www.handgunsmag.com/featured_...ranite_061404/
Last edited by GVFlyer; 10-19-2010 at 08:23..
|
|
|
10-17-2010, 12:39
|
#15
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: PA
Posts: 77,868
|
Looks nice
|
|
|
10-17-2010, 12:42
|
#16
|
|
Beretta 92 Nut!
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Hockey City, Texas
Posts: 2,093
|
|
|
|
10-17-2010, 12:46
|
#17
|
|
Rent this space
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 10,684
|
well you've heard the term M4gery.
the Sig is a 1911forgery
|
|
|
10-17-2010, 12:55
|
#18
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: PA
Posts: 77,868
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quack
well you've heard the term M4gery.
the Sig is a 1911forgery 
|
|
|
|
10-17-2010, 13:07
|
#19
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Somewhere in the air.
Posts: 4,629
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quack
well you've heard the term M4gery.
the Sig is a 1911forgery 
|
Maybe, does it matter? I had the Sig gunsmiths do the Trigger Enhancement and Action Enhancement packages on this gun, the results qualifying it to be my full size 1911 carry gun. The trigger now breaks cleanly at 4.0 lbs, the minimum for a carry gun (in my view).
|
|
|
10-17-2010, 14:38
|
#20
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,364
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CA_DUDE
FWIW, after Browning/FN started making .40 S&W Hi Powers, they started using cast frames over forged. Can't remember if there was a problem with frames or rails cracking.
|
Trivia...
The early FBI 9mm to 40 conversions found that the forged frames were to too soft to handle the 40 and they went to the harder beefed up cast frames, it is now standard on both the 9mm and 40's.
More related trivia.....S&W M&P strikers are now MIM because they are harder.
If you don't like cast, Colt is a good choice as there are only 2 or 3 cast parts in it.
Last edited by remat; 10-17-2010 at 14:41..
|
|
|
10-17-2010, 17:52
|
#21
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Westchester, NY
Posts: 1,048
|
This is one of Nighthawks finest 1911 and it has a Caspian cast frame. I definitely would NOT be concerned about owning this one.
http://www.nighthawktactical.com/The_Enforcer.html
__________________
Retired LEO
SA Customized XD45C and XD40SC, WC CQB 1911 and S&W 1911 3" Lew Horton Pro
The #1 goal of police work is to go home at the end of your shift!
Last edited by ajgranda; 10-18-2010 at 07:00..
Reason: forgot to add NOT
|
|
|
10-17-2010, 17:54
|
#22
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Westchester, NY
Posts: 1,048
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GVFlyer
Maybe, does it matter? I had the Sig gunsmiths do the Trigger Enhancement and Action Enhancement packages on this gun, the results qualifying it to be my full size 1911 carry gun. The trigger now breaks cleanly at 4.0 lbs, the minimum for a carry gun (in my view).
|
Nice, IMO, 4-4.5lbs is perfect for a carry gun. That's what I ordered for my CQB.
__________________
Retired LEO
SA Customized XD45C and XD40SC, WC CQB 1911 and S&W 1911 3" Lew Horton Pro
The #1 goal of police work is to go home at the end of your shift!
Last edited by ajgranda; 10-17-2010 at 17:55..
|
|
|
10-17-2010, 19:01
|
#23
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Smallville
Posts: 4,836
|
When names such as Caspian, Dan Wesson and STI are using cast frames it's time to stop worrying.
|
|
|
10-17-2010, 19:25
|
#24
|
|
Rent this space
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 10,684
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by .45Super-Man
When names such as Caspian, Dan Wesson and STI are using cast frames it's time to stop worrying.
|
/thread
|
|
|
10-17-2010, 19:55
|
#25
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: PA
Posts: 77,868
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ajgranda
|
The Enforcer is awesome.
|
|
|
|
Sponsored Links
|
Advertisement
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 13:41.
|
|
|