Glock Talk Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.
 |
10-30-2010, 19:07
|
#1
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 8
|
351 PD- anyone have one?
I wanted a 22 revolver for shooting with my daughters...
I was set on a ruger sp101 but then I found the 351.
Which way should I go....
|
|
|
11-01-2010, 09:06
|
#2
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,226
|
Ruger Mk III will probably be less expensive anyway...(I'd personally look for an older MKII, if possible)
Even though .22s are almost recoil-free anyway, the PD is a very lightweight revolver...
What little recoil there is, it is even further muted with the 34-36 ounce bull barrel Ruger...
|
|
|
');
document.write(' ');
};
//-->
11-01-2010, 13:29
|
#3
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 2,349
|
The 351 is a 22 magnum. It will cost almost ten times more to shoot. The 317 is the lightweight airtight like the 351 but 8 rss. Instead of 7, both are small frames. They make medium frame, four inch, ten shot, all steel guns that would be the perfect gun to introduce them to shooting.
|
|
|
11-20-2010, 12:32
|
#4
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: NC
Posts: 238
|
I have the 351, 317, and 617 and for just range shooting and general all round plinking I'd recommend the 617 four inch. Heavy, but a tack driver.
Last edited by tim43; 11-20-2010 at 12:32..
|
|
|
11-20-2010, 21:15
|
#5
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: North-Central USA
Posts: 16,630
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by stuffgeek
I wanted a 22 revolver for shooting with my daughters...
I was set on a ruger sp101 but then I found the 351.
Which way should I go.... 
|
Had a .22 Ruger SP-101 years ago, but I got rid of it; wasn't all that accurate, and I didn't like the only-windage-adjustable rear sight.
I also currently have a 8-shot S&W 317 2" and a 10-shot S&W 617 4", and I have to agree that the four-inch 617 would probably be the best choice for this application. The only exception would be if S&W would agree to fit a second cylinder to a model 351, chambered for .22 LR. I know they would do this decades ago for guns originally chambered in .22 WMR, but I heard they stopped offering this through the factory a long time ago.
|
|
|
12-13-2010, 06:23
|
#6
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: 43.12 / 77.67
Posts: 635
|
Tim43,
Re the 617 4"
How accurate is accurate, Im contemplating 617 or a sw classic, liking the stainless 617, trying to decide between the 4 and 6 inch barrel.
I already own a Ruger MK111 hunter for range practice; the 617 will be used for woods gun, plinking etc. I like carrying 4inch barrel revolvers better, have not been able to find much in holster selection for 617 6"
__________________
Glock Certified Armorer
Last edited by leeward419; 12-13-2010 at 06:24..
|
|
|
12-13-2010, 22:19
|
#7
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: North-Central USA
Posts: 16,630
|
Here's the best group from the first range trip with my 617, back when the revolver was new, and my eyes were a bit sharper:
I was happy with these results.
__________________
.
“It is foolish and wrong to mourn the men who died. Rather, we should thank God that such men lived.” -- George S. Patton
.
|
|
|
|
Sponsored Links
|
Advertisement
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:01.
|
|
|