Glock Talk Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.
08-06-2009, 20:17
|
#351
|
|
GT Sponsor
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: Oldtown Idaho USA
Posts: 3,924
|
No good news yet but we should have something very soon.
|
|
|
08-12-2009, 21:01
|
#352
|
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 75
|
Hey JR,
Please sign me up for the frame testing. I have four hundred rounds ready and more on the way.
Best regards,
Fred
|
|
|
');
document.write(' ');
};
//-->
08-16-2009, 09:11
|
#353
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 11
|
Guys, on the below pic, does it look the the beveled nose on the LW slide doesn't match up with the new LW squared frame (2 toned example, not the long slide)? Seems a shame if this is what winds up in full production for the frame without a beveled option...
|
|
|
08-16-2009, 14:48
|
#354
|
|
GT Sponsor
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: Oldtown Idaho USA
Posts: 3,924
|
Old pic.... issue resolved awhile ago
|
|
|
09-01-2009, 14:13
|
#355
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 18
|
JR any word on the frames?
|
|
|
09-01-2009, 14:26
|
#356
|
|
NOT a victim.
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 9,143
|
Hey, I would like to know, from looking at that pic, would we have to change the spring rod when adding a comp to the gun?
|
|
|
09-02-2009, 04:48
|
#357
|
|
Light 'em up!
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 133
|
By the looks of the pictures, is it safe to assume that you will NOT be making a backstrap that will make the grip the same size as the current Glock frame? Pictures look like a "small" or "medium" type back strap.
I don't mind the normal Glock size and I would like to install a magwel, but if the grip size is not the same (or can be made the same) as a Glock frame I don't think any magwel would fit... that would force me back to buying a stock Glock and working from there to build a competition pistol.
Sorry if this has been talked about before.
__________________
Get some.
|
|
|
09-02-2009, 10:34
|
#358
|
|
GT Sponsor
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Oldtown
Posts: 326
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Beware Owner
Hey, I would like to know, from looking at that pic, would we have to change the spring rod when adding a comp to the gun?
|
“spring rod”… Do you mean guide rod and recoil spring?
It depends on the caliber and the ammo you are going to run through the comp. If you are going to use weaker ammo, you will need a lighter recoil spring.
__________________
Dan
Armorer / Engraver
LoneWolfDist.com
(208)-448-0600
|
|
|
09-02-2009, 10:45
|
#359
|
|
NOT a victim.
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 9,143
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by LWD Armorer
“spring rod”… Do you mean guide rod and recoil spring?
It depends on the caliber and the ammo you are going to run through the comp. If you are going to use weaker ammo, you will need a lighter recoil spring.
|
Yeah, that.  .357 Sig and .45 ACP. I read somewhere that you'd have to use a metal guide rod, any truth to this? And, no, if I'm using a comp, it's not because I'm going to push weaker ammo through it...
|
|
|
09-02-2009, 10:57
|
#360
|
|
GT Sponsor
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Oldtown
Posts: 326
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Beware Owner
Yeah, that.  .357 Sig and .45 ACP. I read somewhere that you'd have to use a metal guide rod, any truth to this? And, no, if I'm using a comp, it's not because I'm going to push weaker ammo through it...
|
A metal guide rod is not required, it makes it easier if you want to change spring weight but you do not need to have one when using our comps.
__________________
Dan
Armorer / Engraver
LoneWolfDist.com
(208)-448-0600
|
|
|
09-03-2009, 01:59
|
#361
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 224
|
still waiting patiently to buy. I bought another g22 so I have a top end ready to rock
|
|
|
09-05-2009, 18:07
|
#362
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 18
|
Dan do you have any update on the frame release date....
|
|
|
09-23-2009, 22:07
|
#363
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 603
|
Still waiting.
|
|
|
09-25-2009, 21:47
|
#364
|
|
GT Sponsor
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: Oldtown Idaho USA
Posts: 3,924
|
No news on the latest samples.... sorry. We are patiently waiting
|
|
|
09-26-2009, 13:12
|
#365
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 698
|
JR when these frames are ready for sale, will you guys be offering any discounts on the uppers if they are bought together ?
|
|
|
09-26-2009, 17:02
|
#366
|
|
GT Sponsor
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: Oldtown Idaho USA
Posts: 3,924
|
No I don't think we are going to have any room on that one, sorry.
The truth is that building yourself a custom Glock will add up to about double what the factory Glock comes up to.
|
|
|
09-27-2009, 17:07
|
#367
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Spring, TX.
Posts: 14,253
|
I want one of these specifically for the beavertail feature. Is that still in the design?
|
|
|
09-28-2009, 12:14
|
#368
|
|
GT Sponsor
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: Oldtown Idaho USA
Posts: 3,924
|
Yes the beavertail is built in
|
|
|
09-29-2009, 05:47
|
#369
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 224
|
Im still looking forward to just owning one of the first 100
|
|
|
09-29-2009, 22:08
|
#370
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2
|
JR,
Do you think it will be available in October or November?
I want one or two bad.
Thanks!
|
|
|
09-29-2009, 23:27
|
#371
|
|
Guest
|
this thread was a great long read!
JR,
New here. Just completed reading the entire 15 page thread. I'm a new Glock 22 owner that hates the stock finger groves on the OEM grip! Ha! It seems your finger groves are a bit less pronounced so, I'm very interested in this new LWD lower. On a personal note, I just wanted to say that I admire how calmly you responded to some of the less than *positive* post, comments, and or seemingly snap / judgmental critiques. Looking forward to seeing hearing the update on this product.
|
|
|
|
09-30-2009, 11:21
|
#372
|
|
GT Sponsor
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: Oldtown Idaho USA
Posts: 3,924
|
They were supposed to be available right after SHOT (Jan '09). We have been working on a few minor issues and hope to have them resolved very soon
|
|
|
10-02-2009, 19:47
|
#373
|
|
Caped Crusader
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: W. Wash
Posts: 916
|
for the competitive shooters out there, does anyone know if these frames will qualify as a Stock service pistol in IDPA since they are...not a modification but a factory design?
|
|
|
10-07-2009, 19:41
|
#374
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 603
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JR
The original release is planed as replacement frames only.
Once we get on our feet we will contract to have 2 thousand built. This will qualify the gun to run legal in the SSP (IDPA) and production (USPSA) categories.
We have several well known builders and shooters that provided a lot of input regarding this frame. Believe me when I tell you, every one of them signed off on the finger grips. They are a non issue even to guys that do not want them.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JR
I am looking forward to building a special run of these guns to meet production for both IDPA and USPSA. It is my understanding we will need to build 2000 pistols in one year? If we are able to work it out I will be sure to take every part that is currently listed as "illegal" and incorporate them into our design. Light weight strikers, stainless guide rods, fiber optic sights, front serrations, magwells, whatever they call illegal I want it on the gun!
The 19/23 will follow right after the release of the Timber Wolf in April. I figure this compact frame should be available by Winter, just in time for Christmas
|
Bump!
|
|
|
10-08-2009, 06:20
|
#375
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Central Time Zone
Posts: 790
|

s45
__________________
The problem these days is everyone has rights, but no one has responsibilities.
Newton Minow
|
|
|
|
Sponsored Links
|
Advertisement
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:12.
|
|
|