GlockTalk.com
Home Forums Classifieds Blogs Today's Posts Search Social Groups



  
SIGN-UP
Notices

Glock Talk
Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.

 
  
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-27-2011, 11:47   #1
Willard
Who, me?
 
Willard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 1,353
Sidesaddle vs butt-stock mount

Hi all,

I have a Rem 870, with synthetic youth stock set. In the past, I've used a butt-cuff to keep slugs available, but it isn't stable. I am considering a mounted (screwed-on) shell carrier on the butt-stock. Would you guys discuss this type of carrier compared to a side-saddle? If you prefer one to the other, could you share your thought-process on that decision?

Thanks!
__________________
Big Dawg #828, Niner #828, SubClub #828, 40 Club #828
Heart of Dixie Glockers 25A

I have opted-out of "Political Correctness".
Willard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2011, 12:01   #2
WayaX
Lifetime Membership
Senior Member
 
WayaX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,289
The side-saddle wins, hands down. The butt-cuff is unstable, requires extra weapons manipulation to get to the rounds, makes firing from your weak side very unpleasant, and can interfere with sling attachments. The only upside is it costs somewhere around $10, whereas a good side-saddle is $50-70. The side-saddle also requires a little more modification to the gun to get on, but it usually isn't hard.

The biggest advantage is that the side-saddle puts reloads much closer to the tube and breach. You can do reloads and slug change-overs much faster this way. I can't even begin to imagine the difficulty of doing them from a butt-cuff.
__________________
"Throughout history, it has been the inaction of those who could have acted; the indifference of those who should have known better; the silence of the voice of justice when it mattered most; that has made it possible for evil to triumph."

-Haile Selassie I
WayaX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2011, 13:19   #3
aippi
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,662
Wayax answered pefect, can't add anything to those points. However, if you are considering screwing a shell holder into a synthetic stock you think about the fact that those srews go through a thin wall and will lossen over time and such a mounting is not strong. If this is not a heavy use weapon that system could serve OK. If this weapon is going to see some heavy use or you are in this for the long term, avoid this type of mounting and go with a quality rever mounted shell holder.
__________________
J.D. McGuire, Owner
AI&P Tactical, LLC

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.

Remington LE Armorer
Mossberg LE Armorer

Last edited by aippi; 01-27-2011 at 13:23..
aippi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2011, 14:12   #4
Willard
Who, me?
 
Willard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 1,353
Thanks for the replies! Yes, I realized that the screws would go through thin plastic, but I planned to use a metal reinforcing plate on the inside, with machine screws and lock nuts.

Wayax's explanation was exactly what I was looking for, and with JD's endorsement, that's all I need to know.

BTW - JD, we discussed the shorter LOP youth stock in the past. Wow, what a difference it makes! Even though I have long arms, it is a tremendous improvement!

Thanks again!
__________________
Big Dawg #828, Niner #828, SubClub #828, 40 Club #828
Heart of Dixie Glockers 25A

I have opted-out of "Political Correctness".
Willard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2011, 14:41   #5
USMC06
USMC Retired
 
USMC06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 1,187
I completely agree with the responses above. Side-saddle. No questions. In competitions, with the shells placed on the side-saddle from the bottom, it is easy to just flip the shotgun on the side or upside down while the buttstock is on your shoulder and just almost "drop them in".
__________________
Respectfully and Semper Fi,
USMC 1966-2000
Independent Security Contractor, NRA Certified Firearms Instructor, NRA Life Member, and Unarmed Combat Instructor

Last edited by USMC06; 01-27-2011 at 14:41..
USMC06 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2011, 15:12   #6
MacG22
CLM Number 213
Charter Lifetime Member
 
MacG22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 9,577
A suggestion for you...

Set it up for both, based upon how you want to use it.

Go with a Velcro system. Really stable and I've been impressed. You can put velcro on both the sidesaddle and the buttstock and either switch between them or load both. Side saddle goes empty, and you can move up the whole piece from the buttstock.

I've never had any drop out while shooting, either, and no locktite is required.

Tactical Shotguns



LINK: http://3gungear.corecommerce.com/7-S...addle-p24.html
__________________
“Say what you will about the sweet miracle of unquestioning faith, but I consider the capacity for it terrifying...--Kurt Vonnegut
MacG22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2011, 16:00   #7
Willard
Who, me?
 
Willard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 1,353
Actually, I have some "strips" that look alot like those velcro-sidesaddles. I had even considered using velcro to mount them. ...Hmmm...

... Unless anyone can explain that this might be a "Bad Idea"?
__________________
Big Dawg #828, Niner #828, SubClub #828, 40 Club #828
Heart of Dixie Glockers 25A

I have opted-out of "Political Correctness".
Willard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2011, 16:19   #8
MacG22
CLM Number 213
Charter Lifetime Member
 
MacG22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 9,577
Quote:
Originally Posted by Willard View Post
Actually, I have some "strips" that look alot like those velcro-sidesaddles. I had even considered using velcro to mount them. ...Hmmm...

... Unless anyone can explain that this might be a "Bad Idea"?
At a recent 3 gun competition I saw this setup and asked some questions (I was watching, not shooting). Spoke with a few guys who ran this system. They LOVED it. That's why I started playing around with it. I've found it to be the best of all worlds, so far. In fact, I've had rounds drop out of side saddle carriers before, and shot enough that the saddle came loose and required locktite to trust it would stay in.

So far, nothing like that at all with this setup.
__________________
“Say what you will about the sweet miracle of unquestioning faith, but I consider the capacity for it terrifying...--Kurt Vonnegut
MacG22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2011, 13:49   #9
smoke
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 3,345
I've used Sidesaddles, Arm Strips, Chest Holders, and Buttstock holders. Each has it's purpose. I would recommend the type of buttstock holder made by Spectergear, if you go that route. They make a strip and a strip in a pouch version. The cheap elastic ones suck.

The 870 in my truck has a +2 extended tube, 6 shot Sidesaddle and a Mod'd Spectergear buttstock pouch with 11 rounds in it. I don't have a round chambered, so that's 6 + 6 + 11 rounds in/on the gun, so I can grab and go.
smoke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2011, 10:45   #10
m24shooter
Senior Member
 
m24shooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 218
I would definitely go with a sidesaddle over a stock mount. Particularly a hard mount. Stock mounted shell carriers can make shooting from the support side difficult at best.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MacG22 View Post
At a recent 3 gun competition I saw this setup and asked some questions (I was watching, not shooting). Spoke with a few guys who ran this system. They LOVED it. That's why I started playing around with it. I've found it to be the best of all worlds, so far.
They are quite popular. In addition, I believe that the 3GG is supplied with the 870 MCS kits to the .mil, and I know they are included with the breaching 590 kits to the .mil.
Quote:
In fact, I've had rounds drop out of side saddle carriers before, and shot enough that the saddle came loose and required locktite to trust it would stay in.
I've noticed that too. The 3GG is very sturdy and tight. I've been running a Vang DSAC which kind of combines the more traditional saddle carrier and the Velcro type. The elastic is a little softer, but I haven't had any issues with shells falling out either.

Tactical Shotguns

Tactical Shotguns

Tactical Shotguns
m24shooter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2011, 11:53   #11
MacG22
CLM Number 213
Charter Lifetime Member
 
MacG22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 9,577
Quote:
Originally Posted by m24shooter View Post
I would definitely go with a sidesaddle over a stock mount. Particularly a hard mount. Stock mounted shell carriers can make shooting from the support side difficult at best.

They are quite popular. In addition, I believe that the 3GG is supplied with the 870 MCS kits to the .mil, and I know they are included with the breaching 590 kits to the .mil.

I've noticed that too. The 3GG is very sturdy and tight. I've been running a Vang DSAC which kind of combines the more traditional saddle carrier and the Velcro type. The elastic is a little softer, but I haven't had any issues with shells falling out either.

Tactical Shotguns

Tactical Shotguns

Tactical Shotguns

Thanks for the pics. I've been researching these systems so I can run one on my benellis. I used one on a mossberg and, as reported above, had only good experiences.

As far as why the shells don't fall out as much (pretty much heard the same things from everyone I've talked to who's run one) it's a bit of a physics thing. Because there is tension with the velcro, but the material gives a little and that keeps the vibration from transferring to the rounds, which is one of the factors that shakes them out. So the more rigid the system, the better chance for shells to drop. The other thing I like is that, if the velcro does move a little, all you do is "tap" it back. that easy.

I also like that I can keep 10 strips of shells if I want (just picked a number) and run them in a bag or anywhere and just rip one off and put another on. So I can keep a strip of slugs, a strip of buck, a strip of mixed shells, and a strip of non-lethal (we occasionally use them for wildlife we don't want to kill but get too close to garbage cans, etc).

It's a fast system.
__________________
“Say what you will about the sweet miracle of unquestioning faith, but I consider the capacity for it terrifying...--Kurt Vonnegut
MacG22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2011, 16:14   #12
m24shooter
Senior Member
 
m24shooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 218
Agreed. That's why I went with a Micro for something to throw on when needed without having to dig around for extra ammo in the vehicle. Also allows me to slap one of the carriers from the rig to the shotgun so I can just keep pulling from the Micro. The DSAC panels fit on the Micro as well.

Tactical Shotguns
m24shooter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2011, 18:07   #13
denn1911
Senior Member
 
denn1911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: New England
Posts: 1,666
I'm a fan of the side saddle also. Although I wonder about the elastic shotshell carrier stretching out too soon, I am intrigued with the velcro side saddle. I may try one.
denn1911 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2011, 19:53   #14
m24shooter
Senior Member
 
m24shooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 218
If the elastic were to stretch out, for $20 or even less you get a new one.
Both of these can use the 3GG card, the Vang card, or an Esstac card. I believe the Vang one is the most expensive, which is right at $20.
So if one of them does quit on you (and I don't think I've ever heard of one that did) it is a fairly easy and inexpensive fix.

Last edited by m24shooter; 01-30-2011 at 19:54..
m24shooter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2011, 19:57   #15
MacG22
CLM Number 213
Charter Lifetime Member
 
MacG22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 9,577
Quote:
Originally Posted by m24shooter View Post
Agreed. That's why I went with a Micro for something to throw on when needed without having to dig around for extra ammo in the vehicle. Also allows me to slap one of the carriers from the rig to the shotgun so I can just keep pulling from the Micro. The DSAC panels fit on the Micro as well.

Tactical Shotguns
Would you mind telling me where you got the rig and velcor setup? Which brand did you use? Where did you buy? And how did you set up the rig...did you have to buy any other gear to make it work?

Also, another great thing about the velcro setup is that some autoloading shotguns have an issue with being over tightened when you use a side saddle. It only slightly changes the geometry of the feed system, but at times that can lead to failure. I know Benelli M1 and M2 can have this issue, and I've read reports of the Rem 1100s. The velcro does away with that.
__________________
“Say what you will about the sweet miracle of unquestioning faith, but I consider the capacity for it terrifying...--Kurt Vonnegut

Last edited by MacG22; 01-30-2011 at 20:01..
MacG22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2011, 20:21   #16
m24shooter
Senior Member
 
m24shooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 218
Quote:
Originally Posted by MacG22 View Post
Would you mind telling me where you got the rig and velcor setup? Which brand did you use? Where did you buy?
It is a 12 Gauge Micro Rig from John Willis at Original SOE Gear.
You can order from OSOE directly. It is a semi-custom type operation. They make stuff in batches, but sometimes have stock on hand.
http://www.originalsoegear.com/12gamicro.html
There are some online retailers that sell OSOE gear too, Tactical Response is one place.
Here is a link to a review I did of the rig at Wevo.
http://www.weaponevolution.com/forum...auge-Micro-Rig
Quote:
And how did you set up the rig...did you have to buy any other gear to make it work?
I'm running the rig in the unmodified state. The rig is essentially the base/document pouch, the two shotgun reload pouches with two cards each, and the utility pouch. They are sewn on, but there is a MOLLE/PALs version that you can customize. The rig carries 24 rounds as is, and I'm using the utility pouch as a BOK carrier with a few small extra items/batteries on board.
Quote:
Also, another great thing about the velcro setup is that some autoloading shotguns have an issue with being over tightened when you use a side saddle. It only slightly changes the geometry of the feed system, but at times that can lead to failure. I know Benelli M1 and M2 can have this issue, and I've read reports of the Rem 1100s. The velcro does away with that.
Very true. The Vang DSAC uses a plastic insert to prevent overtightening to avoid the same issue.

Last edited by m24shooter; 01-30-2011 at 20:21..
m24shooter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2011, 21:15   #17
keninnavarre
bulletproof
 
keninnavarre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,020
tagged
__________________
"A handgun is just like the pair of slip-joint pliers in a farmer's pocket. It's not the best tool for the job, but it's what you have with you when something goes wrong." - Bill Jordan
keninnavarre is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2011, 21:37   #18
Victoriagotagun
Senior Member
 
Victoriagotagun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: California
Posts: 2,188
Another 3GG fan here....they work great and haven't had any problems.
__________________
~Victoria~

"Glocks are for criminals" -Nick_45
Victoriagotagun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2011, 23:01   #19
MacG22
CLM Number 213
Charter Lifetime Member
 
MacG22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 9,577
Quote:
Originally Posted by m24shooter View Post
Very true. The Vang DSAC uses a plastic insert to prevent overtightening to avoid the same issue.
Thanks for the info and the links to the review. Excellent quality information--part of what makes the forum so good. Even the guys I talked with at the 3G comp were still figuring out how to get everything setup just right, but most of them were planning on moving to a velcro system.

A few questions left for me:

1. The Vangcomp DSAC... I looked it up and I like the idea. But it didn't specify what gun it fits? Is it a universal part or is it only for one model? With the screw mounts I wouldn't imagine it's universal.

2. So if I wanted to run a similar rig for HD or 3G (which I've been toying with), I would buy either the 3GG or the Vangcomp DSCAC, and then pair it with that micro shell rig you linked to. Then all I would need is shells?

For HD I'd probably put a backer on both the side saddle and the stock. So that I have the ability to load both, either, and for my pump Benelli I would load it on the stock.

That would make it a total of 3 backers (two auto, back on the pump), the micro rig, and then shells. Seems simple and useful, which for me is the standard for an HD setup.

I doubt that the rig would be necessary for basic HD in a suburban environment, but for me it's useful. I spend a meaningful amount of time on a property and have had to chase off both bears and coyotes, as well as nightstand duty. Normally I have my belt bag with different loads in it, and it's a headache. Also, if I get into 3 Gun I would want the redundancy in habit and training.
__________________
“Say what you will about the sweet miracle of unquestioning faith, but I consider the capacity for it terrifying...--Kurt Vonnegut
MacG22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2011, 08:27   #20
Ride5C2
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 78
Quote:
Originally Posted by m24shooter View Post
I would definitely go with a sidesaddle over a stock mount. Particularly a hard mount. Stock mounted shell carriers can make shooting from the support side difficult at best.

They are quite popular. In addition, I believe that the 3GG is supplied with the 870 MCS kits to the .mil, and I know they are included with the breaching 590 kits to the .mil.

I've noticed that too. The 3GG is very sturdy and tight. I've been running a Vang DSAC which kind of combines the more traditional saddle carrier and the Velcro type. The elastic is a little softer, but I haven't had any issues with shells falling out either.

Tactical Shotguns

Tactical Shotguns

Tactical Shotguns
M24,
I'm thinking of changing out my Mesa 6 saddle on my SPX to a velcro version. Did you ever try one of these on the SPX? 3GG & Vang don't seem to have mossberg versions that I can tell. Thanks.
Ride5C2 is offline   Reply With Quote

 
  
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 21:45.




Homepage
FAQ
Forums
Calendar
Advertise
Gallery
GT Wiki
GT Blogs
Social Groups
Classifieds


Users Currently Online: 1,176
326 Members
850 Guests

Most users ever online: 2,672
Aug 11, 2014 at 2:31