GlockTalk.com
Home Forums Classifieds Blogs Today's Posts Search Social Groups



  
SIGN-UP
Notices

Glock Talk
Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-27-2011, 22:19   #1
woodrowNC
Senior Member
 
woodrowNC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: nc, in the woods part
Posts: 1,180
anybody comfortable carrying ball

i know back in the early 2000's clint smith said he didn't bother with hp's to eliminate any chance of a malf. said that big bullet would do the trick. in my opinion all the big name ammo manufacturers make quality hp's, and i'm really confident carrying any of them, but i myself sometimes carry speer lawman. same powder charge for the identical fps and good termimal energy to give officers and identical practice round. it's obviously not gonna do the same internal damage but unless it's a head or heart shot the bg ain't gonna stop and drop instantly anyway. i've got a crapload of 230 lawman i got at a good price, but i've also a crapload of goldots, golden saber and hst's. what do yall think of this. keep in mind there's a bunch of coffins filled with ball recipeints. what do yall think?
woodrowNC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2011, 22:50   #2
rsxr22
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Youngstown, OH
Posts: 2,737
I would carry ball if I couldnt have JHP's, thats about it. If I couldnt get my gun to function properly by trying different ammunition, I would probably get rid of the gun before I carried ball ammo. You are correct, fmj's do indeed kill, but there are enough defense ammo loads out there to try from. If your gun has problems cycling JHP's, try critical defense, pow'r'ball, and/ or Wilson's custom. I know my TRP does not like GD's, GS's, or HS so i wont even attempt running them through anymore. The Winchester PDX-1 and Wilson Combat has never failed me through a 150 round test of the Win and 100 of the WC
rsxr22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2011, 22:52   #3
Foxtrotx1
Senior Member
 
Foxtrotx1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Scottsdale AZ
Posts: 4,025
That Clint Smith guy sounds pretty dumb if he actually said that.
__________________
Tin Foil Free Zone.

Eagle Scout.
Foxtrotx1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2011, 22:55   #4
samuse
Senior Member
 
samuse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: South TX
Posts: 5,162
Blog Entries: 2
Ball will work just fine if you hit a good spot.
__________________
"If you're not shootin', you should be loadin'. If you're not loadin', you should be movin', if you're not movin', someone's gonna cut your head off and put it on a stick." -Clint Smith


Quote:
Originally Posted by Rabbi View Post
You suck at...well, everything so far.
samuse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2011, 23:00   #5
Bowtie
NRA MEMBER
 
Bowtie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: California
Posts: 9,249
My only concern with ball is over penetration.
__________________
.


If You Always Do What You've Always Done,
You'll Always Get What You've Always Got.

Last edited by Bowtie; 01-27-2011 at 23:00..
Bowtie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2011, 23:02   #6
HAIL CAESAR
Senior Member
 
HAIL CAESAR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: In my shop
Posts: 5,230
I've carried ball and SWC's. In fact I still do at times.
HAIL CAESAR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2011, 23:04   #7
rsxr22
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Youngstown, OH
Posts: 2,737
Quote:
Originally Posted by Foxtrotx1 View Post
That Clint Smith guy sounds pretty dumb if he actually said that.
LOL why dont you do a google search on who Clint Smith is....
rsxr22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2011, 23:04   #8
woodrowNC
Senior Member
 
woodrowNC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: nc, in the woods part
Posts: 1,180
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bowtie View Post
My only concern with ball is over penetration.
yes, thought about that.
woodrowNC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2011, 23:05   #9
Bowtie
NRA MEMBER
 
Bowtie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: California
Posts: 9,249
Quote:
Originally Posted by Foxtrotx1 View Post
That Clint Smith guy sounds pretty dumb if he actually said that.
Ball ammo has put alot of people in the ground for alot of years..
__________________
.


If You Always Do What You've Always Done,
You'll Always Get What You've Always Got.
Bowtie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2011, 23:07   #10
woodrowNC
Senior Member
 
woodrowNC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: nc, in the woods part
Posts: 1,180
Quote:
Originally Posted by Foxtrotx1 View Post
That Clint Smith guy sounds pretty dumb if he actually said that.
you are obviously not familiar with clint smith. spend a litttle time on google and educate yourself.
woodrowNC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2011, 23:20   #11
woodrowNC
Senior Member
 
woodrowNC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: nc, in the woods part
Posts: 1,180
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bowtie View Post
My only concern with ball is over penetration.
like i said, i've thought about that, but as far as terminal ballistics, i'm confident it would do the job. and at 17 dollars for 50, it's tempting, compared to a dollar a round of highend sd ammo.

thanks for the opinions.
woodrowNC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2011, 23:27   #12
woodrowNC
Senior Member
 
woodrowNC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: nc, in the woods part
Posts: 1,180
Quote:
Originally Posted by rsxr22 View Post
I would carry ball if I couldnt have JHP's, thats about it. If I couldnt get my gun to function properly by trying different ammunition, I would probably get rid of the gun before I carried ball ammo. You are correct, fmj's do indeed kill, but there are enough defense ammo loads out there to try from. If your gun has problems cycling JHP's, try critical defense, pow'r'ball, and/ or Wilson's custom. I know my TRP does not like GD's, GS's, or HS so i wont even attempt running them through anymore. The Winchester PDX-1 and Wilson Combat has never failed me through a 150 round test of the Win and 100 of the WC
i agree on the pdx1 and also the goldensaber. the rems seem to have a slightly rounder ogive than other hp's and always have. and when i've had finicky 1911s, the gs's always solved the prob. plus at ammotogo they run about 15 for 25.
woodrowNC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2011, 23:34   #13
Foxtrotx1
Senior Member
 
Foxtrotx1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Scottsdale AZ
Posts: 4,025
Why would I run Ball when there are so many viable Bullet choices that won't over penetrate the target and will deliver more KE and a bigger wound channel? If you don't want a malfunction choose and test your ammo carefully and carry a clean reliable gun.
__________________
Tin Foil Free Zone.

Eagle Scout.
Foxtrotx1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2011, 23:36   #14
Cobra64
Deals in Facts
 
Cobra64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Depends on where I am.
Posts: 17,821
Quote:
Originally Posted by Foxtrotx1 View Post

That Clint Smith guy sounds pretty dumb if he actually said that.
Take a Clint Smith class and you'll come back with your tail tucked between your legs.
Cobra64 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2011, 23:40   #15
Bowtie
NRA MEMBER
 
Bowtie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: California
Posts: 9,249
Quote:
Originally Posted by woodrowNC View Post
like i said, i've thought about that, but as far as terminal ballistics, i'm confident it would do the job. and at 17 dollars for 50, it's tempting, compared to a dollar a round of highend sd ammo.

thanks for the opinions.
The good thing about that is you're only going to spend the bigger $$$ testing for a reliable SD ammo. Once you find what your gun likes you're golden. Its not like you're going to be burning up the good ammo every weekend.
__________________
.


If You Always Do What You've Always Done,
You'll Always Get What You've Always Got.
Bowtie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2011, 23:42   #16
Bowtie
NRA MEMBER
 
Bowtie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: California
Posts: 9,249
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cobra64 View Post
Take a Clint Smith class and you'll come back with your tail tucked between your legs.
Yeah no kidding.
__________________
.


If You Always Do What You've Always Done,
You'll Always Get What You've Always Got.
Bowtie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2011, 03:30   #17
Nestor
Lean & Mean
 
Nestor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: From Canada with love!
Posts: 20,970


I wouldn't mind at all in 45 ACP.
Over penetration with 45 may not be an issue.
I can remember that I was reading ballistic post mortem reports on 45 ball somewhere - those bullets under standard pressure are not over penetrating.
__________________
One day your life will flash before your eyes. Make sure its worth watching.

R.I.P Jeff (23Skidoo), Chad (CJLandry) & Mark (Okie) You all will be missed.
Nestor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2011, 03:37   #18
faawrenchbndr
CLM Number 281
NRA Life Member
 
faawrenchbndr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: US
Posts: 31,923
Quote:
Originally Posted by Foxtrotx1 View Post
That Clint Smith guy sounds pretty dumb if he actually said that.



.......

Last edited by faawrenchbndr; 01-28-2011 at 03:37..
faawrenchbndr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2011, 03:46   #19
MadMonkey
Spershul Furces
 
MadMonkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: TX
Posts: 2,753
Send a message via AIM to MadMonkey Send a message via Yahoo to MadMonkey
I carry it in my LCP... would probably carry it in a 1911 too.
MadMonkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2011, 05:21   #20
polizei1
It WAS Quack
 
polizei1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 1,167
Send a message via AIM to polizei1
I would also be concerned with over penetration. Chances are, using FMJ you are much more likely for the round to go through the target completely. Instead, JHP's will do more internal damage as well as usually stopping inside the body. This is the best choice for these reasons. Especially for civilians, you have to think...chances are, if you have to use your weapon, it's probably going to be in public, around other people. You do NOT want over penetration. Think about it.

Companies today that make high-end JHP's are reliable and trustable. Shoot a couple hundred rounds through your gun with the JHP's of your choice (I like Speer Gold Dot's), and once you deem them reliable, carry it.

FMJ ball ammo has specific advantages for the military and civilians who compete or target shoot. However for self defense, no way. To give you an idea I believe some Special Operations units use JHP's, most likely because they are within close proximately of the enemy.

Besides, you're not going to shoot that stuff like target ammo anyway. Once you have enough rounds to deem it reliable, just keep a few boxes on hand and rotate the ammo every month or so.

Oh and something I left out...it depends also where you will be traveling. If you have any chances of encountering a large animal with thick hide (bear), JHP's will be essentially useless, so I've heard.

Last edited by polizei1; 01-28-2011 at 05:22..
polizei1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2011, 05:32   #21
R0CKETMAN
NRA MEMBER
 
R0CKETMAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: SECONUS in HARD TARGET
Posts: 1,407
Quote:
Originally Posted by Foxtrotx1 View Post
That Clint Smith guy sounds pretty dumb if he actually said that.
Quote:
Originally Posted by samuse View Post
Ball will work just fine if you hit a good spot.
Quote:
Originally Posted by rsxr22 View Post
LOL why dont you do a google search on who Clint Smith is....
Quote:
Originally Posted by woodrowNC View Post
you are obviously not familiar with clint smith. spend a litttle time on google and educate yourself.
I'm quite familiar with Clint Smith and although he is not a dumb person by any means, recommending ball as self defense ammo in an urban environment is not smart.

The potential of over penetration is great.
__________________
"BONES HEAL, CHICKS DIG SCARS, PAIN GOES AWAY"

"Home of the Free because of the Brave"

shop.harrisoncustom.com
R0CKETMAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2011, 06:22   #22
FLIPPER 348
Happy Member
 
FLIPPER 348's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Bend Oregon
Posts: 21,786
I use 236g ball in my 1911s for all situations.
FLIPPER 348 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2011, 07:22   #23
GeorgiaRedfish
Senior Member
 
GeorgiaRedfish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Right behind you...
Posts: 3,819
I am using it currently, I am on a college budget and do not have enough money to buy the amount of Hp's I would need to shoot to feel comfortable carring them. Plus Ball .45acp has been killing people for a while so....
__________________
With it, or on it.
GeorgiaRedfish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2011, 07:26   #24
knedrgr
Senior Member
 
knedrgr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: C to the L to the E
Posts: 3,326
Ed Brown carries ball ammo in his EDC.
knedrgr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2011, 07:33   #25
lawdog734
Senior Member
 
lawdog734's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 1,142
Ball ammo would be better than carrying a sharp stick but I'll stay with hp's. I have been running ranger talons thru the no name with 0 problems.
lawdog734 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:05.



Homepage
FAQ
Forums
Calendar
Advertise
Gallery
GT Wiki
GT Blogs
Social Groups
Classifieds


Users Currently Online: 974
291 Members
683 Guests

Most users ever online: 2,244
Nov 11, 2013 at 11:42