Home Forums Classifieds Blogs Today's Posts Search Social Groups



  
SIGN-UP
Notices

Glock Talk
Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.

 
  
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-27-2011, 23:19   #1
woodrowNC
Senior Member
 
woodrowNC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: nc, in the woods part
Posts: 1,180
anybody comfortable carrying ball

i know back in the early 2000's clint smith said he didn't bother with hp's to eliminate any chance of a malf. said that big bullet would do the trick. in my opinion all the big name ammo manufacturers make quality hp's, and i'm really confident carrying any of them, but i myself sometimes carry speer lawman. same powder charge for the identical fps and good termimal energy to give officers and identical practice round. it's obviously not gonna do the same internal damage but unless it's a head or heart shot the bg ain't gonna stop and drop instantly anyway. i've got a crapload of 230 lawman i got at a good price, but i've also a crapload of goldots, golden saber and hst's. what do yall think of this. keep in mind there's a bunch of coffins filled with ball recipeints. what do yall think?
woodrowNC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2011, 23:50   #2
rsxr22
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Youngstown, OH
Posts: 2,737
I would carry ball if I couldnt have JHP's, thats about it. If I couldnt get my gun to function properly by trying different ammunition, I would probably get rid of the gun before I carried ball ammo. You are correct, fmj's do indeed kill, but there are enough defense ammo loads out there to try from. If your gun has problems cycling JHP's, try critical defense, pow'r'ball, and/ or Wilson's custom. I know my TRP does not like GD's, GS's, or HS so i wont even attempt running them through anymore. The Winchester PDX-1 and Wilson Combat has never failed me through a 150 round test of the Win and 100 of the WC
rsxr22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2011, 23:52   #3
Foxtrotx1
Senior Member
 
Foxtrotx1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Scottsdale AZ
Posts: 4,029
That Clint Smith guy sounds pretty dumb if he actually said that.
__________________
Tin Foil Free Zone.

Eagle Scout.
Foxtrotx1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2011, 23:55   #4
samuse
Senior Member
 
samuse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: South TX
Posts: 5,193
Blog Entries: 2
Ball will work just fine if you hit a good spot.
__________________
"If you're not shootin', you should be loadin'. If you're not loadin', you should be movin', if you're not movin', someone's gonna cut your head off and put it on a stick." -Clint Smith


Quote:
You suck at...well, everything so far.
samuse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2011, 00:00   #5
Bowtie
NRA MEMBER
 
Bowtie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: California
Posts: 9,249
My only concern with ball is over penetration.
__________________
.


If You Always Do What You've Always Done,
You'll Always Get What You've Always Got.

Last edited by Bowtie; 01-28-2011 at 00:00..
Bowtie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2011, 00:02   #6
HAIL CAESAR
Senior Member
 
HAIL CAESAR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: In my shop
Posts: 5,241
I've carried ball and SWC's. In fact I still do at times.
HAIL CAESAR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2011, 00:04   #7
rsxr22
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Youngstown, OH
Posts: 2,737
Quote:
Originally Posted by Foxtrotx1 View Post
That Clint Smith guy sounds pretty dumb if he actually said that.
LOL why dont you do a google search on who Clint Smith is....
rsxr22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2011, 00:04   #8
woodrowNC
Senior Member
 
woodrowNC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: nc, in the woods part
Posts: 1,180
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bowtie View Post
My only concern with ball is over penetration.
yes, thought about that.
woodrowNC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2011, 00:05   #9
Bowtie
NRA MEMBER
 
Bowtie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: California
Posts: 9,249
Quote:
Originally Posted by Foxtrotx1 View Post
That Clint Smith guy sounds pretty dumb if he actually said that.
Ball ammo has put alot of people in the ground for alot of years..
__________________
.


If You Always Do What You've Always Done,
You'll Always Get What You've Always Got.
Bowtie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2011, 00:07   #10
woodrowNC
Senior Member
 
woodrowNC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: nc, in the woods part
Posts: 1,180
Quote:
Originally Posted by Foxtrotx1 View Post
That Clint Smith guy sounds pretty dumb if he actually said that.
you are obviously not familiar with clint smith. spend a litttle time on google and educate yourself.
woodrowNC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2011, 00:20   #11
woodrowNC
Senior Member
 
woodrowNC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: nc, in the woods part
Posts: 1,180
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bowtie View Post
My only concern with ball is over penetration.
like i said, i've thought about that, but as far as terminal ballistics, i'm confident it would do the job. and at 17 dollars for 50, it's tempting, compared to a dollar a round of highend sd ammo.

thanks for the opinions.
woodrowNC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2011, 00:27   #12
woodrowNC
Senior Member
 
woodrowNC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: nc, in the woods part
Posts: 1,180
Quote:
Originally Posted by rsxr22 View Post
I would carry ball if I couldnt have JHP's, thats about it. If I couldnt get my gun to function properly by trying different ammunition, I would probably get rid of the gun before I carried ball ammo. You are correct, fmj's do indeed kill, but there are enough defense ammo loads out there to try from. If your gun has problems cycling JHP's, try critical defense, pow'r'ball, and/ or Wilson's custom. I know my TRP does not like GD's, GS's, or HS so i wont even attempt running them through anymore. The Winchester PDX-1 and Wilson Combat has never failed me through a 150 round test of the Win and 100 of the WC
i agree on the pdx1 and also the goldensaber. the rems seem to have a slightly rounder ogive than other hp's and always have. and when i've had finicky 1911s, the gs's always solved the prob. plus at ammotogo they run about 15 for 25.
woodrowNC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2011, 00:34   #13
Foxtrotx1
Senior Member
 
Foxtrotx1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Scottsdale AZ
Posts: 4,029
Why would I run Ball when there are so many viable Bullet choices that won't over penetrate the target and will deliver more KE and a bigger wound channel? If you don't want a malfunction choose and test your ammo carefully and carry a clean reliable gun.
__________________
Tin Foil Free Zone.

Eagle Scout.
Foxtrotx1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2011, 00:36   #14
Cobra64
Deals in Facts
 
Cobra64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Depends on where I am.
Posts: 17,821
Quote:
Originally Posted by Foxtrotx1 View Post

That Clint Smith guy sounds pretty dumb if he actually said that.
Take a Clint Smith class and you'll come back with your tail tucked between your legs.
Cobra64 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2011, 00:40   #15
Bowtie
NRA MEMBER
 
Bowtie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: California
Posts: 9,249
Quote:
Originally Posted by woodrowNC View Post
like i said, i've thought about that, but as far as terminal ballistics, i'm confident it would do the job. and at 17 dollars for 50, it's tempting, compared to a dollar a round of highend sd ammo.

thanks for the opinions.
The good thing about that is you're only going to spend the bigger $$$ testing for a reliable SD ammo. Once you find what your gun likes you're golden. Its not like you're going to be burning up the good ammo every weekend.
__________________
.


If You Always Do What You've Always Done,
You'll Always Get What You've Always Got.
Bowtie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2011, 00:42   #16
Bowtie
NRA MEMBER
 
Bowtie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: California
Posts: 9,249
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cobra64 View Post
Take a Clint Smith class and you'll come back with your tail tucked between your legs.
Yeah no kidding.
__________________
.


If You Always Do What You've Always Done,
You'll Always Get What You've Always Got.
Bowtie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2011, 04:30   #17
Nestor
Lean & Mean
 
Nestor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: From Canada with love!
Posts: 21,120


I wouldn't mind at all in 45 ACP.
Over penetration with 45 may not be an issue.
I can remember that I was reading ballistic post mortem reports on 45 ball somewhere - those bullets under standard pressure are not over penetrating.
__________________
One day your life will flash before your eyes. Make sure its worth watching.

R.I.P Jeff (23Skidoo), Chad (CJLandry) & Mark (Okie) You all will be missed.
Nestor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2011, 04:37   #18
faawrenchbndr
CLM Number 281
The Dude Abides
 
faawrenchbndr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: east of East St. Louis
Posts: 34,289
Quote:
Originally Posted by Foxtrotx1 View Post
That Clint Smith guy sounds pretty dumb if he actually said that.



.......

Last edited by faawrenchbndr; 01-28-2011 at 04:37..
faawrenchbndr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2011, 04:46   #19
MadMonkey
Spershul Furces
 
MadMonkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: TX
Posts: 2,753
Send a message via AIM to MadMonkey Send a message via Yahoo to MadMonkey
I carry it in my LCP... would probably carry it in a 1911 too.
MadMonkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2011, 06:21   #20
polizei1
It WAS Quack
 
polizei1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 1,167
Send a message via AIM to polizei1
I would also be concerned with over penetration. Chances are, using FMJ you are much more likely for the round to go through the target completely. Instead, JHP's will do more internal damage as well as usually stopping inside the body. This is the best choice for these reasons. Especially for civilians, you have to think...chances are, if you have to use your weapon, it's probably going to be in public, around other people. You do NOT want over penetration. Think about it.

Companies today that make high-end JHP's are reliable and trustable. Shoot a couple hundred rounds through your gun with the JHP's of your choice (I like Speer Gold Dot's), and once you deem them reliable, carry it.

FMJ ball ammo has specific advantages for the military and civilians who compete or target shoot. However for self defense, no way. To give you an idea I believe some Special Operations units use JHP's, most likely because they are within close proximately of the enemy.

Besides, you're not going to shoot that stuff like target ammo anyway. Once you have enough rounds to deem it reliable, just keep a few boxes on hand and rotate the ammo every month or so.

Oh and something I left out...it depends also where you will be traveling. If you have any chances of encountering a large animal with thick hide (bear), JHP's will be essentially useless, so I've heard.

Last edited by polizei1; 01-28-2011 at 06:22..
polizei1 is offline   Reply With Quote

 
  
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:42.




Homepage
FAQ
Forums
Calendar
Advertise
Gallery
GT Wiki
GT Blogs
Social Groups
Classifieds


Users Currently Online: 627
172 Members
455 Guests

Most users ever online: 2,672
Aug 11, 2014 at 2:31