GlockTalk.com
Home Forums Classifieds Blogs Today's Posts Search Social Groups



  
SIGN-UP
Notices

Glock Talk
Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.

 
  
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-07-2011, 12:34   #1
skeeter7
Brass Vulture
 
skeeter7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 6,559
Winchester 231 Recipe for 40 S&W

Hello everyone,

I will be setting up my new reloader tomorrow and although I do have a reloading book, I was looking to see what amount of Win 231 powder people are running with their 180 grain FMJ 40 S&W reloads. I know it's a long shot, but I figured I'd give it a try on here. Thanks!
__________________
NECC #401
skeeter7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2011, 12:42   #2
sellersm
disciplinare
 
sellersm's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: CO
Posts: 452
Online loading data from the manufacturer is a great place to start: http://data.hodgdon.com/cartridge_load.asp

They list starting load 4.1 up to 5.0 max for a Hornday XTP bullet.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.


Prosecute criminals, not guns!
sellersm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2011, 12:45   #3
skeeter7
Brass Vulture
 
skeeter7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 6,559
Quote:
Originally Posted by sellersm View Post
Online loading data from the manufacturer is a great place to start: http://data.hodgdon.com/cartridge_load.asp

They list starting load 4.1 up to 5.0 max for a Hornday XTP bullet.
That's what I have in my book as well... 4.1-5.0 . Just didn't know if someone found that sweet spot yet in between.
__________________
NECC #401
skeeter7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2011, 13:52   #4
shotgunred
reloading nut
 
shotgunred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: N W Washington
Posts: 7,611
3.9 WW231

Quote:
4.1-5.0 . Just didn't know if someone found that sweet spot yet in between.
3.7 and 3.9 grain WW231 180 grain Rainier FMJ OAL 1.125 are very nice.
3.7 715 FPS for 128 PF. Groups nice and are very accurate.
__________________
When dealing with Democrats, let us remember we are
not dealing with creatures of logic. We are dealing with
creatures of emotion, creatures bristling with prejudices
and motivated by pride and vanity.
shotgunred is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2011, 17:41   #5
sellersm
disciplinare
 
sellersm's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: CO
Posts: 452
Sweet spot?

The "sweet spot" for you may be different for me....

I really am happy with 4.2gr of W231 as it's fairly light, cycles my G23c fine, and is as accurate as I need it to be. With that said, my friends run much higher loads (read: just slightly over max) in their Rugers! So it's all somewhat subjective.

You'll have to try some loads as the mechanics of your firearm are different from mine.... What works in mine may not work in yours.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.


Prosecute criminals, not guns!
sellersm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2011, 18:06   #6
Poppa Bear
CLM Number 45
Protective G'pa
 
Poppa Bear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: The land of extreme cold and heat
Posts: 2,334


I do not use 231 but this is still relevant. I am working up a new load for my G35 and running my rounds across the chronograph a couple of days ago here is what I found:

Increasing the charge by .2 grains increased FPS by 50.

Changing the OAL from 1.13 to 1.12 increased FPS by 25.

Changing the OAL from 1.12 to 1.11 increased FPS by another 25.

All three loads were pretty accurate, but the OAL of 1.11 was the most accurate and the one that hit clsest to POA.

I still need to change things more because the 1.11 OAL load is still about 50 FPS below the needed velocity of 900 FPS that allows me to shoot major PF in USPSA.

I have already worked up a new set of loads where I increased the charge by another .3 grains and have loaded 10 rounds each at 1.13, 1.12, and 1.11 OAL.

I will run these loads across my chronograph tomorrow and see which one is the most accurate and still makes PF. My guess will be the 1.13 OAL because the change in charge combined with OAL will probably make this the round that shoots closest to POA.

Reloading is very much a trial and error situation because the bullet weight, profile, case, primer, powder, charge, OAL and the weapon it is being fired out of all combine to make it impossible to have a one size fits all load that shoots the same for everybody. Just to many variables involved.
__________________
"The Second Amendment is not about duck hunting, and I know I'm not going to make very many friends saying this, but it's about our right, all of our right to be able to protect ourselves from all of you guys up there." - Dr. Suzanna Gratia Hupp, appearing before Representative Charles Schumer's committee hearings on the assault weapons ban
Poppa Bear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2011, 19:40   #7
shotgunred
reloading nut
 
shotgunred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: N W Washington
Posts: 7,611
Well there ta go three different loads to try out. I shot well over 10 K of that load for IDPA and several classes. It is accurate makes power factor in a G23 and is fun to shoot. I use something different now but not a good beginners load. Go load my two and sellersm and see which one you like best.

have fun.
__________________
When dealing with Democrats, let us remember we are
not dealing with creatures of logic. We are dealing with
creatures of emotion, creatures bristling with prejudices
and motivated by pride and vanity.
shotgunred is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2011, 23:37   #8
skeeter7
Brass Vulture
 
skeeter7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 6,559
Thanks so much for the help thus far, greatly appreciated. I will have to play around with it a little I guess. Start low and work my way up. I will try some of the suggested info.
__________________
NECC #401
skeeter7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2011, 04:54   #9
shotgunred
reloading nut
 
shotgunred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: N W Washington
Posts: 7,611
One of the problems I think a lot of reloaders have is the need to work it on up. Everyone seems to want to see how hard they can run a load. That puts a lot of unneeded wear and tear on both them and their guns. Start low find a load that cycles your gun. That is your base point. From there work it up looking at accuracy. when you find a real accurate load stop! Really look for a sweet spot and not just for how hard you can run your gun. The vast majority of KB are caused by guys loading their pet loads to hot!
__________________
When dealing with Democrats, let us remember we are
not dealing with creatures of logic. We are dealing with
creatures of emotion, creatures bristling with prejudices
and motivated by pride and vanity.
shotgunred is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2011, 15:47   #10
skeeter7
Brass Vulture
 
skeeter7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 6,559
Quote:
Originally Posted by shotgunred View Post
One of the problems I think a lot of reloaders have is the need to work it on up. Everyone seems to want to see how hard they can run a load. That puts a lot of unneeded wear and tear on both them and their guns. Start low find a load that cycles your gun. That is your base point. From there work it up looking at accuracy. when you find a real accurate load stop! Really look for a sweet spot and not just for how hard you can run your gun. The vast majority of KB are caused by guys loading their pet loads to hot!
That's the exact opposite of what I want to do. I do just want a light accurate load to keep wear and tear off my gun. I ended up using 4.4 grains. Loaded 20 rounds and went to the range. Everything felt perfect. I think we have a winner.
__________________
NECC #401
skeeter7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2011, 00:11   #11
noylj
Senior Member
 
noylj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 312
.40 S&W
Bullet Weight Powder Weight Velocity Start/Max Power Factor COL
XTP 180 231/HP38 3.7 696 125 1.1350
Hornady XTP 180 231/HP38 3.7 706 127 1.1350
Hornady XTP 180 231/HP38 3.7 713 128 1.1350
JHP 180 231/HP38 4.0 790 Start 142
JHP, XTP 180 231/HP38 4.5 Accurate 0
JHP 180 231/HP38 5.0 950 Max 171
JHP 180 231/HP38 5.0 940 169 1.1200
XTP 180 231/HP38 5.0 947 170 1.1250
JHP 180 231/HP38 5.0 950 171
Sierra JHP 180 231/HP38 5.5 983 Max 177
Speer PHP 180 231/HP38 5.5 1020 Max 184
noylj is offline   Reply With Quote

 
  
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:41.




Homepage
FAQ
Forums
Calendar
Advertise
Gallery
GT Wiki
GT Blogs
Social Groups
Classifieds


Users Currently Online: 738
183 Members
555 Guests

Most users ever online: 2,244
Nov 11, 2013 at 16:42