Home Forums Classifieds Blogs Today's Posts Search Social Groups



  
SIGN-UP
Notices

Glock Talk
Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.

 
  
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-13-2011, 19:45   #1
MrVvrroomm
Senior Member
 
MrVvrroomm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Shakopee, MN USA
Posts: 3,282
HP38 vs Win231

I know HP38 and Win231 are currently the same powder. I have experience using both.

My question: how long have they been the same powder?

Reason for question: I came upon a pound of HP38 today that I believe was made prior to the merger/takeover.

Reloading

Reloading

Reloading

I was going to email Hodgdon, but they would rather be called. I will call them in the morning.
__________________
May I assume you're not here to inquire about the alcohol or the tobacco?

Certified Glock Armorer

Last edited by MrVvrroomm; 10-13-2011 at 19:47..
MrVvrroomm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2011, 20:33   #2
WiskyT
Malcontent
 
WiskyT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 11,764
They've always been the same powder. Freakshow has posted the specific info to prove this in other threads on the same topic.
__________________
Drugs are bad because if you do drugs you're a hippie and hippies suck.
Eric Cartman


"If you kill enough of them, they stop fighting."-General Curtis E. LeMay
WiskyT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2011, 21:25   #3
fredj338
Senior Member
 
fredj338's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: so.cal.
Posts: 21,733
Blog Entries: 3
Well, I will decent. Based on older book data, like the SPeer #11, they are slightly diff. Maybe it's only a lot to lot variation type of diff, but diff still. That particular one is the older variety, I would use older data if pushing the top end. If you are well off that, I wouldn't worry about the small diff.
__________________
"Given adequate penetration, a larger diameter bullet will have an edge in wounding effectiveness. It will damage a blood vessel the smaller projectile barely misses. The larger permanent cavity may lead to faster blood loss. Although such an edge clearly exists, its significance cannot be quantified".
fredj338 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2011, 21:38   #4
WiskyT
Malcontent
 
WiskyT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 11,764
Quote:
Originally Posted by fredj338 View Post
Well, I will decent. Based on older book data, like the SPeer #11, they are slightly diff. Maybe it's only a lot to lot variation type of diff, but diff still. That particular one is the older variety, I would use older data if pushing the top end. If you are well off that, I wouldn't worry about the small diff.
Why is it so hard for you to accept that they have always been the same powder? Freakshow has gotten confirmation directly from St. Marks that they have always been the same powder. Who would know better than them?

Here's the previous go-around on this:

http://www.glocktalk.com/forums/show....php?t=1367319

It's like saying two different bottles of 231 aren't the "same" powder.
__________________
Drugs are bad because if you do drugs you're a hippie and hippies suck.
Eric Cartman


"If you kill enough of them, they stop fighting."-General Curtis E. LeMay
WiskyT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2011, 21:38   #5
MrVvrroomm
Senior Member
 
MrVvrroomm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Shakopee, MN USA
Posts: 3,282
Quote:
Originally Posted by fredj338 View Post
That particular one is the older variety, I would use older data if pushing the top end. If you are well off that, I wouldn't worry about the small diff.
No issues with going to the top with this. I'm just using it for a .40 gamer load.
__________________
May I assume you're not here to inquire about the alcohol or the tobacco?

Certified Glock Armorer
MrVvrroomm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2011, 21:49   #6
WiskyT
Malcontent
 
WiskyT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 11,764
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/m...0/ai_n6180926/
__________________
Drugs are bad because if you do drugs you're a hippie and hippies suck.
Eric Cartman


"If you kill enough of them, they stop fighting."-General Curtis E. LeMay
WiskyT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2011, 22:42   #7
freakshow10mm
10mm Advocate
 
freakshow10mm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Michigan's Upper Peninsula
Posts: 11,284
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrVvrroomm View Post
I came upon a pound of HP38 today that I believe was made prior to the merger/takeover.
Hodgdon doesn't own Winchester powder, they have distribution rights to Winchester powder as a brand. Winchester powder is and always has been, St Marks Powder. Hodgdon HP38 and Winchester 231 have always been St Marks #231 powder.
__________________
Commercial ammunition manufacturer since 2006.
You can kill it. We can help.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
freakshow10mm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2011, 00:42   #8
fredj338
Senior Member
 
fredj338's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: so.cal.
Posts: 21,733
Blog Entries: 3
Quote:
Originally Posted by WiskyT View Post
Why is it so hard for you to accept that they have always been the same powder? Freakshow has gotten confirmation directly from St. Marks that they have always been the same powder. Who would know better than them?

Here's the previous go-around on this:

http://www.glocktalk.com/forums/show....php?t=1367319

It's like saying two different bottles of 231 aren't the "same" powder.
Well, when pubblished data for the two powders / identical componets yields diff results, then I would say they were diff. If that is as simple as the manuf taking diff lots & marketing them as diff powders, that by definition would make them slightly diff. Enough to matter, probably not, unless you are loading at the top. Much like loading diff lots of powder, w/ some powders that have huge lot to lot variations, you have to reduce the loads & start over, treating it like a diff powder, at least as to how it performs @ the top end.
__________________
"Given adequate penetration, a larger diameter bullet will have an edge in wounding effectiveness. It will damage a blood vessel the smaller projectile barely misses. The larger permanent cavity may lead to faster blood loss. Although such an edge clearly exists, its significance cannot be quantified".
fredj338 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2011, 03:03   #9
noylj
Senior Member
 
noylj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 312
This is very close to stupid.
You are to always re-evalute your loads when using a new lot. You can compare any two manuals and see different max loads. The old lot of 231/HP38 may be slightly different from your new lot of 231/HP38, but that doesn't stop them both from being 231/HP38.
If you want, then consider each and every lot of 231/HP38 as being "different" and simply accept that that is the way it works.
Now, if the test facilities would look at the average pressure, average peak pressure, average velocity, etc. and the standard deviation, they could compare different powders and lots of powders to determine if one powder was equivalent to another powder or lot of powder at a 99%, 95%, or even a 90% confidence interval and we might see several powders that, while they may not be "the same" in terms of being from the same batch of powder, they are "the same" in terms of performance. I would wager that the old lot of 231/HP38 and the new lot of 231/HP31 would be statistically the "same" at better than the 99% confidence even with a couple of tenths of a grain in max load. Almost all loads probably have a 0.2gn variation is max pressure, particularly in different guns.
I have also heard from people who claim that their guns can tell the difference between HP38 and 231. In all cases, they have not even fired ten (10) groups with each to do any statistical analysis. In most case, they took the results of one (1) target and "assumed" that any further testing would simply duplicate the same results.
I can tell you right now that the group that produced a 0.27" c-to-c group at 25 yards, has also produced a group of up to 2.5" if I fire up to 10 groups of the same powder, primer, bullet.
When I have done this with one lot of HP38 and one lot of 231, guess what? Using a t-test on my groups showed no statistical difference at a 90% confidence limit. Note, that that means that there is still a 10% possibility that those two different lots were actually "different."
noylj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2011, 05:33   #10
rewster
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 138
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
__________________
regards....roger

The only time I ever said "no" to a drink was when I mis-understood the question. Will Sinclair
rewster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2011, 20:39   #11
LoadedTech
Senior Member
 
LoadedTech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: virginia beach
Posts: 1,058
HP38 and W231 have different VDM's, (Volume Measure Density) unlike W296 and H110. Just saying.....
__________________
EDC G27 Virginia CHP holder VCDL member-Glad to have them fighting for my 2A! Nra member
LoadedTech is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2011, 21:11   #12
WiskyT
Malcontent
 
WiskyT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 11,764
Quote:
Originally Posted by LoadedTech View Post
HP38 and W231 have different VDM's, (Volume Measure Density) unlike W296 and H110. Just saying.....
0.0926 vs. 0.0931, they throw the same weights per given cavity with the Lee autodisc.
__________________
Drugs are bad because if you do drugs you're a hippie and hippies suck.
Eric Cartman


"If you kill enough of them, they stop fighting."-General Curtis E. LeMay
WiskyT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2011, 21:21   #13
freakshow10mm
10mm Advocate
 
freakshow10mm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Michigan's Upper Peninsula
Posts: 11,284
Quote:
Originally Posted by LoadedTech View Post
HP38 and W231 have different VDM's, (Volume Measure Density) unlike W296 and H110. Just saying.....
I think the company who manufactures them is the ultimate authority. St Marks confirms there is no difference between the powder marketed as HP38 and the powder marketed as W231. It's identical to their SMP #231 powder. Period.
__________________
Commercial ammunition manufacturer since 2006.
You can kill it. We can help.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
freakshow10mm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2011, 21:29   #14
WiskyT
Malcontent
 
WiskyT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 11,764
Quote:
Originally Posted by freakshow10mm View Post
I think the company who manufactures them is the ultimate authority. St Marks confirms there is no difference between the powder marketed as HP38 and the powder marketed as W231. It's identical to their SMP #231 powder. Period.
There really aren't two sides to this one like 9 v 45 or pro and con on the FCD, there is only one powder with two lables.
__________________
Drugs are bad because if you do drugs you're a hippie and hippies suck.
Eric Cartman


"If you kill enough of them, they stop fighting."-General Curtis E. LeMay
WiskyT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2011, 09:45   #15
freakshow10mm
10mm Advocate
 
freakshow10mm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Michigan's Upper Peninsula
Posts: 11,284
Exactly.
__________________
Commercial ammunition manufacturer since 2006.
You can kill it. We can help.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
freakshow10mm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2011, 19:07   #16
Jim Watson
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Alabama
Posts: 6,755
I have no doubt that Hodgdon is now filling orders for Win 231 and HP38 out of the same truckload from St Marks; whichever they have the most demand for on any given day.

Some older manuals show maximum loads differing by as much as 10% with the same bullet, brass, and barrel.
That is a lot of lot to lot variation, even if it did come off the same production line.
__________________
I have a few facts and a lot of opinions.

Last edited by Jim Watson; 10-17-2011 at 19:07..
Jim Watson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2011, 19:16   #17
WiskyT
Malcontent
 
WiskyT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 11,764
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim Watson View Post
I have no doubt that Hodgdon is now filling orders for Win 231 and HP38 out of the same truckload from St Marks; whichever they have the most demand for on any given day.

Some older manuals show maximum loads differing by as much as 10% with the same bullet, brass, and barrel.
That is a lot of lot to lot variation, even if it did come off the same production line.
It could also be a lot of variation in the testing process. I have my own personal skepticism regarding the "science" of pressure testing. It's supposed to be so scientific, yet even from the same labs, data varies from edition to edition, and by a large amount to.

They tell you what is okay to use, but they don't tell you all the data they generated. That's fine, they can't be expected to market a reloading manual that is the physical size of the health care law. But I wonder how different their averages are for two identicle ten shot strings shot one after the other? If they worked up a given load, and then did it again, would the answer they get be exactly the same?
__________________
Drugs are bad because if you do drugs you're a hippie and hippies suck.
Eric Cartman


"If you kill enough of them, they stop fighting."-General Curtis E. LeMay
WiskyT is offline   Reply With Quote

 
  
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:26.




Homepage
FAQ
Forums
Calendar
Advertise
Gallery
GT Wiki
GT Blogs
Social Groups
Classifieds


Users Currently Online: 761
140 Members
621 Guests

Most users ever online: 2,672
Aug 11, 2014 at 2:31