GlockTalk.com
Home Forums Classifieds Blogs Today's Posts Search Social Groups



  
SIGN-UP
Notices

Glock Talk
Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.

 
  
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-19-2011, 20:41   #1
TX Archer
Senior Member
 
TX Archer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 231
Hogdon/Winchester Load Data for .40 S&W

I hesitate to ask this because I feel like I should have figured this out for myself but I'll just suck it up and ask. Why does the Hogdon/Winchester online load data only list data for hollow points? I know it's a business thing and they're trying to push Hornady XTP but I expected some data for 180 gr .40 FMJ.

I doubt anyone remembers but I posted an intro thread about a month ago. I've been reading and studying for months and my equipment should arrive by the weekend. Reading all your comments, I have been convinced that WSF is a decent powder for a new loader to use with this caliber. I have Speer #14 and Lyman 49th. Lyman only lists JHP data for 180 gr. and Speer doesn't list WSF. I know better than to try to extrapolate from JHP to load FMJ but I've hit this roadblock with .40 and it isn't a problem with 9mm.

So to take my long-winded post and boil it down, I'm trying to find published load data for 180 gr .40 FMJ using WSF but striking out. Why can't I find it?

Last edited by TX Archer; 10-19-2011 at 22:02..
TX Archer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2011, 21:33   #2
fredj338
Senior Member
 
fredj338's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: so.cal.
Posts: 21,647
Blog Entries: 3
Read the Speer book closer, the data is for JHP, GDHP & TMJ. You are going to be using starting or just above starting data anyway. Load them to 1.125"OAL if your gun will take that & work up in 0.1gr increments. Look at the Lyman manual, pg364, you'll see data for a 190grJHP. You can always use heavier bullet data for lighter bullets, regardless of JHP or FMJ. I think the Lyman manuals 40 data is kind of messed up though as to vel/pressures. I know that my rounds are going way faster than what they show. SO go ahead & use the starting data for the 180grJHP, loaded to the longest OAL your gun/bbl will take & work it up. I think you'll find about 5.6gr is where you want to be.
__________________
"Given adequate penetration, a larger diameter bullet will have an edge in wounding effectiveness. It will damage a blood vessel the smaller projectile barely misses. The larger permanent cavity may lead to faster blood loss. Although such an edge clearly exists, its significance cannot be quantified".

Last edited by fredj338; 10-19-2011 at 21:33..
fredj338 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2011, 22:01   #3
TX Archer
Senior Member
 
TX Archer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 231
Quote:
Originally Posted by fredj338 View Post
Read the Speer book closer, the data is for JHP, GDHP & TMJ. You are going to be using starting or just above starting data anyway. Load them to 1.125"OAL if your gun will take that & work up in 0.1gr increments. Look at the Lyman manual, pg364, you'll see data for a 190grJHP. You can always use heavier bullet data for lighter bullets, regardless of JHP or FMJ. I think the Lyman manuals 40 data is kind of messed up though as to vel/pressures. I know that my rounds are going way faster than what they show. SO go ahead & use the starting data for the 180grJHP, loaded to the longest OAL your gun/bbl will take & work it up. I think you'll find about 5.6gr is where you want to be.
Thanks a lot. I didn't realize that it was ok to use data for heavier bullets. Is that because the added weight is in the length? I believe that would translate to lower pressure when the same powder charge is used with the same OAL?

The problem for me with the Speer manual is that it doesn't include WSF. (I saw that I made a typo which confused you as to my question about Speer. Corrected it. Sorry.)

I'll follow your advice on the length and the oft repeated advice around here - start low and work up slowly. I'm not into speed or thrill seeking. I just want to be safe. I really appreciate the advice.

Last edited by TX Archer; 10-19-2011 at 22:03..
TX Archer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2011, 08:57   #4
PCJim
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: FL
Posts: 2,930
TX, Fred's advise is sound. Regarding using heavier bullet data, if you look at any reloading manual and compare powder charges for a specific type of powder for various bullet weights, you will see that you use less powder as you increase bullet weight. Thus, the rule of thumb (with limited exceptions such as when using H110 powder) that you can use a heavier bullet's charge data for a lighter bullet.

That being said, in the case of say a 308 Win loading, I would not want to use data for a 200gr bullet to develop loads for a 125 gr bullet. That is too much of a jump, and more relevant, closer data can be found.
PCJim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2011, 09:21   #5
fredj338
Senior Member
 
fredj338's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: so.cal.
Posts: 21,647
Blog Entries: 3
Quote:
Originally Posted by PCJim View Post
TX, Fred's advise is sound. Regarding using heavier bullet data, if you look at any reloading manual and compare powder charges for a specific type of powder for various bullet weights, you will see that you use less powder as you increase bullet weight. Thus, the rule of thumb (with limited exceptions such as when using H110 powder) that you can use a heavier bullet's charge data for a lighter bullet.

That being said, in the case of say a 308 Win loading, I would not want to use data for a 200gr bullet to develop loads for a 125 gr bullet. That is too much of a jump, and more relevant, closer data can be found.
Good point, I should have put the caveat that usually it applies to one bullet wt higher, but in reality, you could use 200gr data for a 125gr bullet as a starting point if there were nothing else available. I have done sim thing developing data for wildcat rounds where that may be all you have is say a 200gr bullet & 250gr bullet.
__________________
"Given adequate penetration, a larger diameter bullet will have an edge in wounding effectiveness. It will damage a blood vessel the smaller projectile barely misses. The larger permanent cavity may lead to faster blood loss. Although such an edge clearly exists, its significance cannot be quantified".

Last edited by fredj338; 10-21-2011 at 16:48..
fredj338 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2011, 14:50   #6
noylj
Senior Member
 
noylj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 312
Bullet Weight Powder Weight Velocity Start/Max Power Factor COL
JHP 180 WSF 5.0 860 Start 155
JHP 180 WSF 5.0 860 Start 155 1.135
JHP 180 WSF 5.0 853 Start 154
Sie JHP 180 WSF 5.0 853 Start 154
Hdy HP-XTP 180 WSF 5.4 946 Start 170 1.125
N/A 180 WSF 5.5 Accurate 0 1.125
JHP 180 WSF 5.6 950 Factory 171
J-all 180 WSF 5.6 945 Start 170 1.135
Hdy HP-XTP 180 WSF 5.8 1013 Max 182 1.125
TMJ,GD-HP 180 WSF 5.8 935 Start 168 1.120
JHP 180 WSF 5.9 981 177
J-all 180 WSF 6.2 1040 Max 187 1.135
JHP 180 WSF 6.2 1040 Max 187 1.135
Sie JHP 180 WSF 6.2 993 Max 179
TMJ,GD-HP 180 WSF 6.4 1019 Max 183 1.120
noylj is offline   Reply With Quote

 
  
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 18:04.




Homepage
FAQ
Forums
Calendar
Advertise
Gallery
GT Wiki
GT Blogs
Social Groups
Classifieds


Users Currently Online: 1,235
400 Members
835 Guests

Most users ever online: 2,244
Nov 11, 2013 at 16:42