Home Forums Classifieds GT Store Blogs Today's Posts Search Social Groups


Glock Talk
Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.

Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-15-2011, 10:16   #1
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,261
Send a message via Yahoo to silverado_mick
Opinions on this?


Terror suspect defence bill passes US House

FBI Director Robert Mueller said it was not clear how the provision would impact law enforcement agencies
Continue reading the main story
Related Stories

'CIA prison' found in Bucharest
USS Cole suspect faces tribunal
The US House of Representatives has passed a defence bill likely to change the way the US detains terror suspects.

The bill passed after the White House lifted a veto threat, noting "several important changes" had been made. It is likely to go to the Senate on Thursday.

The bill also includes additional sanctions against Iran's central bank and freezes some aid to Pakistan.

The clauses are part of a wider, $662bn (428bn) defence bill approving weapons systems and military salaries.

In the most scrutinised parts of the legislation, the bill would deny terror suspects - including US citizens - of the right to trial and would permit indefinite detention.

'Additional discretion'
The issue is part of a wider debate over whether to treat terror suspects as criminals or prisoners of war, correspondents say.

Top members of the president's national security team, including Defence Secretary Leon Panetta and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, negotiated for changes to the parts of the bill that deal with the handling of terror suspects.

The law will require that the military take custody of terrorism suspects but safeguards the president's ability to prosecute detainees in the civilian justice system.

US citizens would be exempt from this provision, and affirms that the changes would not affect US law enforcement agencies.

White House Press Secretary Jay Carney said the bill "does not challenge the president's ability to collect intelligence, incapacitate dangerous terrorists and protect the American people."

But some officials had more practical objections to the clause. FBI Director Robert Mueller criticised the provision for its lack of clarity on how the changes would be implemented at the time of arrest.

The White House said that some of those concerns remain.

"While we remain concerned about the uncertainty that this law will create for our counter-terrorism professionals, the most recent changes give the president additional discretion in determining how the law will be implemented," Mr Carney added.
I know this has been posted elsewhere on GT by now, but the circumvention of our legal system and the granting of total power to the POTUS to implement the new law however he sees fit directly affects public service in general IMHO.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Semper Fi
silverado_mick is offline   Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 19:30.

GT Wiki
GT Blogs
Social Groups
GT Store

Users Currently Online: 1,359
405 Members
954 Guests

Most users ever online: 4,669
Apr 28, 2015 at 22:56