GlockTalk.com
Home Forums Classifieds Blogs Today's Posts Search Social Groups



  
SIGN-UP
Notices

Glock Talk
Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.

 
  
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-27-2011, 18:34   #1
squirreld
Senior Member
 
squirreld's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: US of A
Posts: 3,940
5.56 load development results (almost complete)

In an effort to find the most accurate loading of TAC and LC brass, here are half of my results.
The other half I will complete in the coming months.

Bullet weight and type in the top left, powder charge of TAC in the top right in .3 gr. increments. Tula SRM primers. 4 shots at each charge. 4x12 Leupold scope. Sand bagged, took about 2 hours to send these 92 rounds down range.

Definitely a lot of losers, a couple winners.
Ran through a 16" BCM Middy @ 125 yards.
Looking for group size, not position.

I noticed that some of the lead tipped rounds did not fully chamber on charging the rifle. Fwd assist fixed that. All shots, the bolt fully closed.

Bullets fired,
Sierra 63 gr. SMP
Winchester 64 gr. PP
Sierra 65 gr. SBT
Hornady 68 gr HPBT-M

Bullets I still need to test,
Sierra 69 gr. SMK
Barnes 69 gr. Match Burner
Nosler 69 gr. HPBT-M
Speer 70 gr. Soft Point


http://home.earthlink.net/~squirreld...mi%20point.jpg
http://home.earthlink.net/~squirreld...0Win.%20PP.jpg
http://home.earthlink.net/~squirreld...itzer%20BT.jpg
http://home.earthlink.net/~squirreld....%20HPBT-M.jpg

I'm really not crazy about any of these results.
63 gr. SMP was marginal at low and max loads.
64 gr. Win. PP is an all around loser.
65 gr. Sierra SBT looked good at 24.9 gr. of TAC.
68 gr. Hornady looked good at the 2 lower loadings, you can see this pattern open up nicely.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.

Part 1
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.

Part 2
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.

Last edited by squirreld; 12-27-2011 at 18:44..
squirreld is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2012, 08:12   #2
creophus
Born Again
 
creophus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,751
I think your Sierra 63gr load that grouped at 1.25" is a winner. That's 1 MOA, which is plenty accurate for almost anything. What results are you striving to get?
__________________
Click here ->
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
<-Shooting, Reloading a BBQ videos!

#448 .40S&W, 1911, Rimfire , Kalishnikov, & Black Rifle club
creophus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2012, 14:44   #3
mizer67
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 30
If you have RL-15 handy, try 24.0 - 25.0 grains at 2.25" OAL with the 69 gr SMK.

24.7 grains is a load that'll shoot into .84" at 100 yards for an average of 3, 10-rd groups in my SS410 barreled BCMs. Not super fast, but accurate.
mizer67 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2012, 15:42   #4
fredj338
Senior Member
 
fredj338's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: so.cal.
Posts: 21,651
Blog Entries: 3
Quote:
Originally Posted by mizer67 View Post
If you have RL-15 handy, try 24.0 - 25.0 grains at 2.25" OAL with the 69 gr SMK.

24.7 grains is a load that'll shoot into .84" at 100 yards for an average of 3, 10-rd groups in my SS410 barreled BCMs. Not super fast, but accurate.
And again, all guns are diff. Everyone swears by Varget in the 308 & my rifle was just hohum using Varget. Accuracy starts w/ the bullet but even gold stds like the SMK aren't going to always give the best results.
__________________
"Given adequate penetration, a larger diameter bullet will have an edge in wounding effectiveness. It will damage a blood vessel the smaller projectile barely misses. The larger permanent cavity may lead to faster blood loss. Although such an edge clearly exists, its significance cannot be quantified".
fredj338 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2012, 21:38   #5
squirreld
Senior Member
 
squirreld's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: US of A
Posts: 3,940
I'm looking for the most accurate with good velocity.
Wherever that dart falls is what my load is.

I was not that impressed with most of these.
A couple were good, albeit at slower speeds.

Once I test the other bullets, Ill update this post. Might be a month or so now that the cold is upon us.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.

Part 1
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.

Part 2
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
squirreld is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2012, 22:24   #6
EL_NinO619
EX-Swage Monkey
 
EL_NinO619's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,624
In my remington 700 SpS Tac-to-cool my best groups are with IMR 3031... Thats fine groups for a AR, my real question here is, How in the hell did you know where to aim, you pick a college rule line or what....?
__________________
se carga el diablo de la pistola...
25acp,.223,25-20win,.308, 8mm M, 7mm Rem Mag, 9mm,.40,10mm .45acp, .475 Wildey Mag
On 2 Hornady LNL's And a Super 1050

As Reloaders we should adapt the load to the gun, not the gun to the load.
EL_NinO619 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2012, 22:46   #7
Boxerglocker
Jacks #1 Fan
 
Boxerglocker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Lynnwood, WA
Posts: 5,982
Try 69g SMKs with 23.5 Tac @ 2.250.

I was testing that load today with my 16 inch DDM4V2 at 100 yards using a Vortex Viper 1-4 and Geissele SD-C trigger. That load was sub 1 moa with 3 out of 5, 3 shot groups.
__________________
Glock 3rd Gen G19/G34, 4th Gen G17 FDE, G26,
Dillon
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
&
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
BLUE Kool-aid drinking team member
Boxerglocker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2012, 19:35   #8
Magelk
Member
 
Magelk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 63
I didn't think any of the groups are all that bad out of a 16 inch middy at 125 yards. The 1.25 inch I'd take.
Magelk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2012, 19:42   #9
shotgunred
reloading nut
 
shotgunred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: N W Washington
Posts: 7,616
What is your barrel twist rate?

I would think that you would be better of with a 50 to 55 grain bullet with a 16" barrel.
__________________
When dealing with Democrats, let us remember we are
not dealing with creatures of logic. We are dealing with
creatures of emotion, creatures bristling with prejudices
and motivated by pride and vanity.
shotgunred is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2012, 22:33   #10
squirreld
Senior Member
 
squirreld's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: US of A
Posts: 3,940
Boxer,
that load is on tap =-)

Shotgunred,
1:7

I ordered a 2 stage trigger.
That should help some.
I am going to cut the 64gr Win. PP's from the running as the QC on them bullets were terrible.
The 63 gr I will cut as well, a little to light for me. I went with a 1:7 for heavier bullets, not lighter ones.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.

Part 1
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.

Part 2
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
squirreld is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2012, 00:53   #11
Boxerglocker
Jacks #1 Fan
 
Boxerglocker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Lynnwood, WA
Posts: 5,982
Quote:
Originally Posted by squirreld View Post
Boxer,
that load is on tap =-)

Shotgunred,
1:7

I ordered a 2 stage trigger.
That should help some.
I am going to cut the 64gr Win. PP's from the running as the QC on them bullets were terrible.
The 63 gr I will cut as well, a little to light for me. I went with a 1:7 for heavier bullets, not lighter ones.
Yeah that load was passed down to me and surprised me too. My DD is also a 1:7 twist. The Geissele triggers are awesome.
__________________
Glock 3rd Gen G19/G34, 4th Gen G17 FDE, G26,
Dillon
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
&
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
BLUE Kool-aid drinking team member
Boxerglocker is offline   Reply With Quote

 
  
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 21:53.




Homepage
FAQ
Forums
Calendar
Advertise
Gallery
GT Wiki
GT Blogs
Social Groups
Classifieds


Users Currently Online: 1,198
306 Members
892 Guests

Most users ever online: 2,244
Nov 11, 2013 at 16:42