GlockTalk.com
Home Forums Classifieds Blogs Today's Posts Search Social Groups



  
SIGN-UP
Notices

Glock Talk
Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.

 
  
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-24-2012, 03:04   #1
TBO
CLM Number 122
Why so serious?
 
TBO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: NRA Life Member
Posts: 47,090
Blog Entries: 1


Judge: Americans can be forced to decrypt their laptops

http://news.cnet.com/8301-31921_3-57...their-laptops/
TBO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2012, 04:00   #2
Oso
Senior Member
 
Oso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Sturgis Michigan
Posts: 790
So what's the worst consequences if you refuse to decrypt? I guess you would have to decide if what you have encrypted is going to get you more or less time in the pokey.


Outdoor Hub mobile, the outdoor information engine
Oso is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2012, 12:51   #3
Booker
Senior Member
 
Booker's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,481
Blackburn can get stuffed!
Booker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2012, 13:44   #4
CitizenOfDreams
Senior Member
 
CitizenOfDreams's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 8,117
It must be maddening for the law enforcement to have citizens who can hide something from them.
CitizenOfDreams is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2012, 13:52   #5
Chad Rogers
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: mid-Atlantic
Posts: 170
It's been so long I no longer remember the password. And, of course, I never wrote it down as a backup.
Chad Rogers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2012, 16:46   #6
holesinpaper
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,402
Encrypt whole drive with Truecrypt, and create a hidden volume.

http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/create-...n-truecrypt-7/

http://www.schneier.com/blog/archive...ypts_deni.html
holesinpaper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2012, 02:38   #7
TBO
CLM Number 122
Why so serious?
 
TBO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: NRA Life Member
Posts: 47,090
Blog Entries: 1


Quote:
Originally Posted by CitizenOfDreams View Post
It must be maddening for the law enforcement to have citizens who can hide something from them.
What about Criminals hiding something?
__________________
"Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing had happened."

"If you have integrity, nothing else matters. If you don't have integrity, nothing else matters".

"A person who won't reason has no advantage over one who can't reason."

"Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored."

“Ignorance is a lot like alcohol: the more you have of it, the less you are able to see its effect on you.”


Originally Posted by Rooster Rugburn:
Didn't the whole sheepdog thing actually start right here on Glock Talk? A bunch of wannabees bought a bunch of T-shirts and took an oath to defend those who won't defend themselves?
TBO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2012, 04:08   #8
Oso
Senior Member
 
Oso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Sturgis Michigan
Posts: 790
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheeBadOne View Post
What about Criminals hiding something?
As long as there is a law against it, criminals won't hide anything. Eh?


Outdoor Hub mobile, the outdoor information engine
Oso is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2012, 05:38   #9
Misty02
Senior Member
 
Misty02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,980
I dislike the idea of criminals getting of a technicality, yet I see little difference in a person that uses the 5th amendment to not incriminate themselves by not providing statements that would later be used against them and not providing a password to access information that can later be used against them. My impression of the amendment is the idea of getting the accused to participate and assist in building a case against them.

I don’t like it one bit if it helps a dangerous person avoid justice, but I understand how one should not be expected to help authorities to build a case.

.
__________________


"In making tactical dispositions, the highest pitch you can attain is to conceal them." - Sun Tzu

Outpost Member #69
Misty02 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2012, 07:40   #10
CitizenOfDreams
Senior Member
 
CitizenOfDreams's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 8,117
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheeBadOne View Post
What about Criminals hiding something?
If you had the proof of their crime, you wouldn't be so eager to read the data from their laptops. So we should use the word "suspects", not "criminals" at this point.

Last edited by CitizenOfDreams; 01-25-2012 at 07:43..
CitizenOfDreams is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2012, 16:00   #11
Misty02
Senior Member
 
Misty02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,980
Quote:
Originally Posted by CitizenOfDreams View Post
If you had the proof of their crime, you wouldn't be so eager to read the data from their laptops. So we should use the word "suspects", not "criminals" at this point.
Naaaaa, many are criminals regardless of the amount of evidence that can be gathered (and is admissible) and what is proven in a court of law. There are criminals out there that have evaded justice and continue to harm others, lack of a conviction doesn’t change what they are it just changes what the courts/law can call them.

.
__________________


"In making tactical dispositions, the highest pitch you can attain is to conceal them." - Sun Tzu

Outpost Member #69
Misty02 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2012, 16:08   #12
Sgt127
Senior Member
 
Sgt127's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,514
Texas Penal Code:

Quote:
§ 37.09. TAMPERING WITH OR FABRICATING PHYSICAL
EVIDENCE. (a) A person commits an offense if, knowing that an
investigation or official proceeding is pending or in progress, he:
(1) alters, destroys, or conceals any record,
document, or thing with intent to impair its verity, legibility, or
availability as evidence in the investigation or official
proceeding;...
(c) An offense under Subsection (a) or Subsection (d)(1) is
a felony of the third degree.
If he refuses to divulge the password, is he not effectively concealing the evidence?

Last edited by Sgt127; 01-25-2012 at 16:09.. Reason: typo
Sgt127 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2012, 16:34   #13
CitizenOfDreams
Senior Member
 
CitizenOfDreams's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 8,117
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sgt127 View Post
If he refuses to divulge the password, is he not effectively concealing the evidence?
If the accused produces documents that incriminate him, isn't it effectively "being a witness against himself"?
CitizenOfDreams is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2012, 16:41   #14
CitizenOfDreams
Senior Member
 
CitizenOfDreams's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 8,117
Quote:
Originally Posted by Misty02 View Post
Naaaaa, many are criminals regardless of the amount of evidence that can be gathered (and is admissible) and what is proven in a court of law.
Me and you may call them criminals. The law enforcement may not call them criminals or treat them as such. Those are the rules. And, contrary to a popular opinion, those rules were not made to protect the criminals.
CitizenOfDreams is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2012, 16:52   #15
trashcat
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 435
A suspect has a safe, the prosecutors want to see the contents. The suspect says I will not assist you in gathering evidence against me by providing the combination.
The best safe cracker in town fails to open the safe, can he be forced to provide the combination?
trashcat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2012, 21:03   #16
Sam Spade
Lifetime Membership
Senior Member
 
Sam Spade's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 21,481
Quote:
Originally Posted by CitizenOfDreams View Post
If the accused produces documents that incriminate him, isn't it effectively "being a witness against himself"?
I don't see how it's any more providing testimony against yourself than opening the door to your house when the search warrant shows up. The evidence is what's inside the house/laptop, not your having the key to the door. And if you're concerned that the jury will know you had the key, then we just won't tell them that.
__________________
"To spit on your hands and lower the pike; to stand fast over the body of Leonidas the King; to be rear guard at Kunu-Ri; to stand and be still to the Birkenhead Drill; these are not rational acts. They are often merely necessary." Pournelle

Last edited by Sam Spade; 01-26-2012 at 21:05..
Sam Spade is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2012, 21:49   #17
Sam Spade
Lifetime Membership
Senior Member
 
Sam Spade's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 21,481
Quote:
Originally Posted by trashcat View Post
A suspect has a safe, the prosecutors want to see the contents. The suspect says I will not assist you in gathering evidence against me by providing the combination.
The best safe cracker in town fails to open the safe, can he be forced to provide the combination?
Yes. The 5th Amendment protects you against testimony. It's not a protection when you're subpoenaed to produce records, no matter how bad those records make you look. And in this case, the owner wasn't actually ordered to provide the key, she was ordered to provide the records stored in the safe. The exception is when there's doubt about the ownership of the safe/laptop and the records in it. That's not in play in this case; ownership isn't in question.

Related, from http://volokh.com/2012/01/24/encryti...incrimination/
"If the police have a warrant to search the defendant’s office for documentary evidence of a criminal fraud and find a locked file cabinet, the warrant reaches the contents of that cabinet. Issues about: (1) “expectation of privacy” in a locked cabinet; or (2) “proof” of what the government believes is in the cabinet are now irrelevant issues. Whatever may be inside is reachable by the police because they already satisfied the Fourth Amendment and got a warrant. This is true even if the cabinet contains evidence of a wholly separate crime, like possession of child pornography."
__________________
"To spit on your hands and lower the pike; to stand fast over the body of Leonidas the King; to be rear guard at Kunu-Ri; to stand and be still to the Birkenhead Drill; these are not rational acts. They are often merely necessary." Pournelle
Sam Spade is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2012, 23:27   #18
CitizenOfDreams
Senior Member
 
CitizenOfDreams's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 8,117
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sam Spade View Post
And if you're concerned that the jury will know you had the key, then we just won't tell them that.
So, it would be a valid defence if the accused pleaded the Fifth in response to the question "Do you have the encryption key to the files on your laptop?"?
CitizenOfDreams is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2012, 03:25   #19
holesinpaper
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,402
Quote:
Originally Posted by trashcat View Post
can he be forced to provide the combination?
Not yet. You can just get locked up. Give it another couple years and then they will be water boarding US citizens on US soil.

holesinpaper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2012, 04:33   #20
Misty02
Senior Member
 
Misty02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,980
Quote:
Originally Posted by CitizenOfDreams View Post
Me and you may call them criminals. The law enforcement may not call them criminals or treat them as such. Those are the rules. And, contrary to a popular opinion, those rules were not made to protect the criminals.
Sometimes I wonder about that, personal knowledge doesn’t seem to support it.

Nonetheless, I do believe there is little difference in this particular instance, an individual being required to provide a password or to facilitate information that is encrypted would be no different than providing a statement that would incriminate themselves. Either way, it would constitute assisting the prosecution in building a case against them. If discovery of that information is obtained without the active assistance of the person, then that is a different story.

.
__________________


"In making tactical dispositions, the highest pitch you can attain is to conceal them." - Sun Tzu

Outpost Member #69
Misty02 is offline   Reply With Quote

 
  
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 15:44.




Homepage
FAQ
Forums
Calendar
Advertise
Gallery
GT Wiki
GT Blogs
Social Groups
Classifieds


Users Currently Online: 1,006
304 Members
702 Guests

Most users ever online: 2,672
Aug 11, 2014 at 2:31