GlockTalk.com
Home Forums Classifieds Blogs Today's Posts Search Social Groups



  
SIGN-UP
Notices

Glock Talk
Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.

 
  
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-28-2012, 21:57   #1
DirtyDan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 152
Gun Disarms:Long-gun vs Handgun

Dear Mas,

I've always been of the opinion that the handgun offered the best weapon retention in a CQ home defense situation, but recently read an article stating that the long-gun was actually harder for the bad guy to disarm from it's rightful owner or get out of the line of fire.This didn't make sense to me ,but I've been wrong before, so I thought I'd ask an expert.

Thank you very much,
Dan
DirtyDan is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2012, 08:39   #2
Mas Ayoob
KoolAidAntidote
 
Mas Ayoob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,060
It's been my experience over the decades that it's easier to get a long gun away from someone than a handgun. It's a matter of leverage: the longer gun gives the "disarmer" a longer lever to use against the person originally holding it.

I'm not sure of your source. They may have been talking about the fact that if the gun is tethered to the shooter, as by a 3-point sling, it would obviously be harder to get COMPLETELY away from the person originally holding it. However, the person doing the disarming would still have a good shot (no pun intended) at controlling the muzzle. They would also, to some degree, be able to control the sling-wearer's body movements.

best,
Mas
Mas Ayoob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2012, 10:53   #3
DirtyDan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 152
Here's the source....
http://www.theboxotruth.com/docs/edu143.htm

I think you outlined it perfectly here...
http://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/201...nicles-part-v/

Last edited by DirtyDan; 01-29-2012 at 11:00..
DirtyDan is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2012, 11:01   #4
Mas Ayoob
KoolAidAntidote
 
Mas Ayoob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,060
Dan, while I would agree with your linked source on several points, relative ease of disarming is not one of them. If you scroll down the enclosed link, the assumption is that the assailant has simply grabbed the barrel and remained in front of the muzzle where he can be "lit up." With handgun OR long gun, that's not how a disarm is likely to occur, unless your assailant is a true candidate for Darwin Awards.

best,
Mas
Mas Ayoob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2012, 13:53   #5
DirtyDan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 152
Mas,

The article was sent to me from a friend and the authors ideas in regards to weapon retention are what really stood out and we're contrary to what I've always thought & was taught. My background is in Martial Arts and I've worked on a lot of disarm training over the years as well reading much of your extensive work on weapon retention & training it and feel pretty confident in those area's.You focus more on weapon retention than most & I feel a lot of Instructors overlook it's importance in Civilian self-defense. I was perplexed by the articles assumptions, but wanted to double check with you to be sure I was on the right track & not missing something.I'm glad we are on the same page.

Thanks again.
Dan
DirtyDan is online now   Reply With Quote

 
  
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 19:54.




Homepage
FAQ
Forums
Calendar
Advertise
Gallery
GT Wiki
GT Blogs
Social Groups
Classifieds


Users Currently Online: 1,328
363 Members
965 Guests

Most users ever online: 2,244
Nov 11, 2013 at 16:42