GlockTalk.com
Home Forums Classifieds Blogs Today's Posts Search Social Groups



  
SIGN-UP
Notices

Glock Talk
Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.

 
  
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-05-2012, 11:20   #1
Rugar Fan
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 33
Slap Jack & Lead Gloves

I have a Georgia CCW for personal defense. In order to avoid using a handgun in a situation against an intoxicated or drugged individual who is unarmed but advancing on to hurt me, would it look more responsible to use a slap jack rather than using a firearm? At the age of 55, I can no longer protect myself against someone half my age or against multiple assailants bare handed, and it would seem prudent to have another option for avoiding an armed confrontation. I also carry a mace-type spray,but that may not work against a seriously drugged individual.

How do the courts look upon someone with a CCW using a non-firearm weapon to avoid using a handgun? Similar to using a slap jack, how do the courts look upon a middle-age man using police gloves with lead or steel shot to settle a bad situation?

I want to avoid a costly lawsuit from discharging a firearm against an unarmed assailant. Thank you for your comments.
Rugar Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2012, 11:47   #2
Mas Ayoob
KoolAidAntidote
 
Mas Ayoob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,055
Several problems with the concept, bro.

1. Check your state laws. In many states, permit to carry gun covers ONLY guns; saps, blackjacks, weighted gloves etc. remain prohibited items for carry.

2. These are contact weapons, that keep you in punching distance and still require skill to use. Saps and jacks can be used to strike wrists and hands, but you're still in the other guy's kicking range, and you'll need very good timing.

3. Jacks, saps, and weighted gloves often end up being used for head strikes. High likelihood of fractured skulls, brain damage, eye damage...in short, "death or grave bodily harm." You are seen as armed man using a deadly weapon on unarmed man. Also, if he ends up crippled or dead, you are seen as having destroyed a guy you yourself didn't think needed that degree of force, or you would have used your gun. Not the easiest position to defend.

The pepper spray is a good choice, and needs its own training of course. You're right that it doesn't always work immediately, but then, neither do bullets. Check Georgia law to see if you're allowed to carry a "Civilian TASER," which might be another useful intermediate force option for you.

Best of luck,
Mas
Mas Ayoob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2012, 12:55   #3
Rugar Fan
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 33
Thank you for your comments as that is how the courts would probably judge. I just use the mace type spray instead.

In one of your books that I have, you mentioned carrying a roll of quarters to have more impact while throwing a punch. How would the courts view this option? Your thoughts are very much appreciated.
Rugar Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2012, 15:27   #4
Mas Ayoob
KoolAidAntidote
 
Mas Ayoob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,055
It would be good if you could show that you regularly needed quarters, whether for parking meters or newspaper machines or whatever.

best,
Mas
Mas Ayoob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2012, 20:40   #5
Rugar Fan
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 33
Excellent! Thank you again for your help. Best regards
Rugar Fan is offline   Reply With Quote

 
  
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:33.




Homepage
FAQ
Forums
Calendar
Advertise
Gallery
GT Wiki
GT Blogs
Social Groups
Classifieds


Users Currently Online: 774
157 Members
617 Guests

Most users ever online: 2,244
Nov 11, 2013 at 16:42