Important Notice: The site is currently being upgraded to a new software system. This process could take a day or two to complete. During that time, we are going to leave the site up here, on its old software. WHAT GETS POSTED HERE DURING THIS TRANSITION WILL NOT BE COPIED OVER ONTO THE NEW SITE, WHEN THE UPGRADE IS COMPLETE. When we swap over, the content posted while this message is visible will be lost. We wanted to give you folks a place to hang out and talk while we worked though. We will let you know when we are finished. Please pardon the inconvenience, during this transition.

Home Forums Classifieds GT Store Blogs Today's Posts Search Social Groups


Glock Talk
Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.

Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-09-2012, 18:22   #1
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 53
.223 reliability

Thanks for taking the time to answer out questions, I'm sure you sigh sometimes. My question is this, would the average .223 round, hollow point, soft point, whatever be reliable for my safety. Let me first say that I don't want to get hit with one, and neither does anyone else, but I ca't see a there being ahuge debate on the topic if there isn't something to it. Having talked with GIs comming back from the middle east and hearing of stories of emptying half a magazine into an assailant (in ball ammo) to bring them down, I don't know how it will work for me. My biggest thought, is that if I would't use a .223 when hunting for anything larger than an unsuspecting coyote, how reliable is it going to be on someone who's full up on drugs, alcohol and adrenaline through clothing. People who shoot deer with the .223 regardless of load, very often end up tracking, and that was without the pre-shot adrenaline. I hear good things about other carbine cartridges like the 6.8 SPC and the like, but there are too many stories about the .223/5.56 failures for me to ignore. Though they probably exist, I haven't heard a single story about a well or even semi-well placed .308 or .30-06 round not taking down a target. Mas, I'm lost and having internal battles. Please help me figure out where to stand. Thanks again.
wvboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2012, 18:37   #2
Mas Ayoob
Mas Ayoob's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,473
You ain't alone, WVboy. The myriad of cartridges available in the ubiquitous .223/5.56 lineup cover a lot of country. The varmint load you mention in one sphere, the current NATO round designed for penetrating enemy helmets and body armor at X distance in another sphere, police needs for engaging suspects ensconced in motor vehicles in yet another, and more. What's likely to be behind that which we're shooting at is a very important concern that doesn't crop up so much in the hunting fields or on long range battlefields.

For home defense, I think it's pretty tough to beat a .223 55-grain hollow point rated for 3200 feet per second. These rounds have an awesome history on non-armored hostile human targets.

As with .30-06, .223 users have to look at the EXTREMELY broad array of ammunition, decide what they're going to shoot under what circumstances, and select accordingly.

Mas Ayoob is offline   Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 14:56.

GT Wiki
GT Blogs
Social Groups
GT Store

Users Currently Online: 844
231 Members
613 Guests

Most users ever online: 4,867
May 19, 2015 at 1:03