GlockTalk.com
Home Forums Classifieds Blogs Today's Posts Search Social Groups



  
SIGN-UP
Notices

Glock Talk
Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-03-2012, 20:56   #1
firefighter4215
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 973
.40, Longshot, and 135 grain Nosler JHP

Well, I got some of the 135 grain Nosler JHPs to play with in my G22. The Hodgdon data says 1,434 fps at a max load from a 4" barrel. I got some new Double Tap brass to use as I neared the max load, and used once-fired RP brass for everything else. My starting load velocities were about right considering the 1/2" longer barrel. The max load is 11.5 grains. I was averaging about 1,425 fps at 10.3 grains. The brass and primer looked great. I kept working my way up, 3/10 of a grain, and stopped at 10.9 grains. I fired 2 of that load. One was 1,494 fps, and the other 1,493. The recoil was pretty stout, and all of these loads were very loud. The brass and primers looked good from the starting load up to the 10.9 load. I pulled a couple of my 10.9 loads and weighed the charge on a different, digital scale. It still said 10.9 grains, so my Lee scale was accurate. I had anticipated a slightly higher velocity due to the longer barrel from the G22 vs their 4" test barrel. However, my results seem a little off. I decided to discontinue testing that load for fear of damaging the gun. I'm pretty sure the pressure was fine, but was concerned about the slide velocity. Has anyone else tested this load? Any input would be appreciated. It was 47 degrees outside at around 500' elevation, for those who want to get technical. All bullets were seated to 1.129", just slightly longer than the Hodgdon test load of 1.125."

Outdoor Hub mobile, the outdoor information engine
firefighter4215 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2012, 21:52   #2
freakshow10mm
10mm Advocate
 
freakshow10mm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Michigan's Upper Peninsula
Posts: 11,096
I've done workups with that combination at many different temperatures and I'm 600ft above sea level. The max load at 1.125 is around 1550fps with my results. Chronograph 15 feet from muzzle.

The handloading community doesn't nickname Longshot as "Loudshot" for anything. For some reason the powder is just loud.
__________________
Commercial ammunition manufacturer since 2006.
You can kill it. We can help.
Remember the fallen at www.odmp.org
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tku8YI68-JA
freakshow10mm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2012, 10:51   #3
SDGlock23
Yahshua Saves!
 
SDGlock23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Land of Forgetfulness
Posts: 6,707
You might want to use a heavier spring to help tame down the wear on the gun, but I don't really think it's going to be terribly hard on your gun anyways...unless you shot it constantly.

I worked up some LS loads w/135gr Noslers a few years back from the G23 and didn't get the numbers I had hoped for, but it could have been that particular batch of LS too. For the record, 10.5grs (or was it 11?) of 800x gave me 1556 fps avg. with the G23 and 135 Noslers. But it doesn't meter worth anything, so if you can get good numbers with LS, stick with it. That bullet isn't particularly tough anyways, it blows apart in no time and will probably give you very shallow penetration.

VV 3n38 could be another good one, but I've only used it with 155gr and 165gr, but with great results.
__________________
Repent America, destruction is at hand
http://www.be4thefire.com
www.tribulation-now.org

SDGlock23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2012, 14:46   #4
firefighter4215
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 973
Thanks for the replies. My previous experience with chrono'ing Longshot loads was that the Hodgdon data seemed a little optimistic regarding velocity. This load appears to be a major exception. It's not a plinking load for me. I mainly just did it for the heck of it.

Outdoor Hub mobile, the outdoor information engine
firefighter4215 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2012, 18:04   #5
greenlion
Senior Member
 
greenlion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 852
If you are working 135 grain loads up around 1,500fps wouldn't any powder generate more recoil and a louder report? I mean, you're creeping up on .357 magnum territory there. Is Longshot loud with medium velocity loads as well? Just curious..
greenlion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2012, 04:26   #6
firefighter4215
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 973
Good question. I personally think part of that noise was indeed the bullet traveling at 1500 fps. It was much louder than my 1100 fps 165 grain loads. A lot more recoil too. This load actually exceeds some 357 125 grain factory loads from a 4" barrel revolver. The Remington 125 grain rounds we chrono'd were somewhere between 1425 and 1450 out of a 4" Ruger Security Six.

Outdoor Hub mobile, the outdoor information engine
firefighter4215 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:37.



Homepage
FAQ
Forums
Calendar
Advertise
Gallery
GT Wiki
GT Blogs
Social Groups
Classifieds


Users Currently Online: 1,326
547 Members
779 Guests

Most users ever online: 5,723
Apr 16, 2009 at 11:36