Home Forums Classifieds Blogs Today's Posts Search Social Groups



  
SIGN-UP
Notices

Glock Talk
Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.

 
  
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-05-2012, 17:54   #1
Denied
NRA Member
 
Denied's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ohio
Posts: 649
Judge: Gun Owners Need Not Justify

If this had been posted before, just suck it up.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012...onstitutional/
__________________
"Good judgment comes from experience, and a lot of that comes from bad judgment." --Will Rogers
Denied is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2012, 18:00   #2
dakrat
Senior Member
 
dakrat's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: worldwide, on time, on target
Posts: 2,944
__________________
---Revolvers are the future---
dakrat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2012, 20:29   #3
Sbh87
Handgunner
 
Sbh87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Near the Smith and Wesson Factory
Posts: 254
__________________
Scott
Sbh87 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2012, 21:48   #4
High Altitude
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 2,060
One state at a time.

Quote:
"A citizen may not be required to offer a 'good and substantial reason' why he should be permitted to exercise his rights," Legg wrote. "The right's existence is all the reason he needs."

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012...#ixzz1oIyLtGvF

Last edited by High Altitude; 03-05-2012 at 21:48..
High Altitude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2012, 21:51   #5
xmanhockey7
Senior Member
 
xmanhockey7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Kalamazoo, Michigan
Posts: 1,606
Quote:
“We disagree with this ruling," Fader said in a written statement that noted the "very important implications of the ruling for public safety."
There will be blood in the streets if Maryland becomes shall issue.
__________________
My current avatar is the logo for my group Young Guns of Michigan. Check us out on Facebook!
xmanhockey7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2012, 05:37   #6
NicholsT55
Member
 
NicholsT55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Yuma, AZ
Posts: 21
Send a message via Yahoo to NicholsT55
Quote:
Originally Posted by xmanhockey7 View Post
There will be blood in the streets if Maryland becomes shall issue.
That's the stance that the anti-gunners take regarding any attempt to relieve the draconian gun laws in Maryland.

Even with current laws, a hot Saturday night in Baltimore will end with several gun-related deaths. Maybe knowing that their potential victims can shoot back will help to reduce the death toll.
__________________
Top Gun .357 Sig Club Member #55
Official M1911 Club Member #21
FALaholic #55
NicholsT55 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2012, 05:46   #7
Stefan
Senior Member
 
Stefan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: York County, Pa
Posts: 148
I live in PA but spend much of my waking hours in MD. I hope things change in Md.

Stefan
Stefan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2012, 07:59   #8
Lowjiber
Senior Member
 
Lowjiber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 941
Quote:
Originally Posted by NicholsT55 View Post
...Maybe knowing that their potential victims can shoot back will help to reduce the death toll.
At least even the "score".

Today's score...Criminals 7: Victims 0

Tomorrow's score...Victims 4: Criminals 3

__________________
G'day and G'lock.

ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒE
Lowjiber is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2012, 12:11   #9
SCmasterblaster
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Hartford, Vermont
Posts: 16,034
I used to live in MD. It is good to see some good news from MD.
__________________
Gun Ownership Offers Freedom in Many Dimensions
SCmasterblaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2012, 14:02   #10
B.Reid
Senior Member
 
B.Reid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Montana
Posts: 2,285
WOW a judge that can read the Constitution, good for him.
__________________
Embrace the apocalypse!

Earth has always been a dangerous place to live. Be prepared!
B.Reid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2012, 20:55   #11
Civilian sheep Dog
Senior Member
 
Civilian sheep Dog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 164
As it should be
Civilian sheep Dog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2012, 21:24   #12
Free Radical
CLM Number 259
Miembro Antiguo
 
Free Radical's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Four Corners
Posts: 18,841


Clearly a step forward in establishing the difference between a need and a right.
Free Radical is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2012, 17:51   #13
EAJuggalo
Senior Member
 
EAJuggalo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Eagan, MN
Posts: 1,999
Send a message via AIM to EAJuggalo Send a message via Yahoo to EAJuggalo


http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...s-win-a-round/
This was in the Washington Times today from Emily Miller, who just jumped through all the legal hoops to purchase a legal gun in D.C.

I found this quote from a D.C. Councilman particularly revolting.
Quote:
Mr. Mendelson said that his committee will not address the carry laws in D.C. until the Maryland case “plays out.” He called it “new ground in jurisprudence” that will be appealed. The at-large Democrat said that the Woollard decision wouldn’t relate to the District because the plaintiff was in a rural area far from political big shots.

“I do think carrying has severe implications for the nation’s capital,” he told The Washington Times, citing the common rationale given by local officials. “We’re different from Maryland because we have motorcades, the president around town, members of Congress going to the supermarket unescorted.”
Russ, let me know if that is too much of the article to post and I'll gladly reduce it.
__________________
People killed by:
MN permit holders 3
MPLS Light Rail 9
Updated 3-22-13
EAJuggalo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2012, 11:02   #14
eruby
Senior Member
 
eruby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: People's Republc of Maryland
Posts: 646
I'm still elated over this court victory, but am a realist and know that Maryland will do whatever it can to keep the status quo.

More court wins are coming for us, and in time, we will get 'shall issue' but it's a long row to hoe.
eruby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2012, 11:56   #15
SpringerTGO
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,486
“I do think carrying has severe implications for the nation’s capital,” he told The Washington Times, citing the common rationale given by local officials. “We’re different from Maryland because we have motorcades, the president around town, members of Congress going to the supermarket unescorted.”

You really have to feel sorry for all those members of Congress going to the supermarket unescorted.
I know I hate it when I don't have an escort. It's just so unsafe.
SpringerTGO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2012, 13:25   #16
tercel89
Senior Member
 
tercel89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tn
Posts: 3,435
Quote:
Originally Posted by lowjiber View Post
at least even the "score".

Today's score...criminals 7: Victims 0

tomorrow's score...victims 4: Criminals 3

awesome!!!!!
tercel89 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2012, 14:41   #17
OctoberRust
Anti-Federalist
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Texas
Posts: 5,642
So when's california's turn for this attorny to take action against?
OctoberRust is offline   Reply With Quote

 
  
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 14:12.




Homepage
FAQ
Forums
Calendar
Advertise
Gallery
GT Wiki
GT Blogs
Social Groups
Classifieds


Users Currently Online: 931
270 Members
661 Guests

Most users ever online: 2,672
Aug 11, 2014 at 2:31