GlockTalk.com
Home Forums Classifieds Blogs Today's Posts Search Social Groups



  
SIGN-UP
Notices

Glock Talk
Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.

 
  
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-14-2012, 14:00   #1
ROBSPLUMBER
'OP'
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Socialist State of Maryland
Posts: 10
What do you think of the sig p290?

I am looking for a new pocket 9mm. In the past I have had a Ruger LCP, which works wells as a pocket pistol. This time I would like to go with a 9mm instead of a .380. I want something that is truly designed to be pocket carried and is reliable, preferrably without all the break in required with the LCP. You always hear good things about Sig. Anyone out there own one and would like to give their opinion. Should I consider something else? Thanks for your input.
ROBSPLUMBER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2012, 14:07   #2
ctfireman
Senior Member
 
ctfireman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Bridgeport, CT
Posts: 3,645
Not bad but i ended up shoosing the beretta nano over the 290. Check em out side by side before you make a purchase!
__________________
GSSF & NRA member
"It's better to have a gun & not need it than to need one & not have it"

Rest in peace Okie, your memory will live on forever.
ctfireman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2012, 14:15   #3
bac1023
Senior Member
 
bac1023's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: PA
Posts: 92,263
Not my cup of tea
__________________
.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
bac1023 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2012, 14:45   #4
FCastle88
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: PA
Posts: 1,483
The P290 is way too heavy for a pocket gun, and the 9lb trigger pull is a bit ridiculous. Still complaints of light strikes, hammer not falling, trigger not resetting, etc., according to Sig there's a redesigned trigger mechanism either already out, or being released soon. I'd go with a PM9/CM9 or Nano, my CM9 has been 100% reliable so far, and it's 4oz lighter than the P290 and has a nice 6.5lb trigger pull that feels lighter.
FCastle88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2012, 14:49   #5
dhoomonyou
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: florida
Posts: 4,982
Blog Entries: 1
tried a friends
heavy
did not like trigger
__________________
Big Dawg # 1190
40SW # 259
Florida Glockers Club # 711
Smith & Wesson Club # 711
Do not demand accomplishment from those with no talent.
dhoomonyou is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2012, 15:52   #6
barth
six barrels
 
barth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: The Free Zone
Posts: 5,231
I love steel Sigs and have a P220/45 and P239/357.
Just can't warm up to Tupperware Sigs.
I do carry a Glock G27 with a Storm lake 40-9mm conversion barrel and
Ghost rocket 3.5 short reset connector.

The P938 9mm looks interesting, but cocked and locked???

For now I'm patiently waiting on the new Sig P224.
It looks to have about the same dimensions as my G27.
But it's a Sig.

I have high hopes for that one!!!
General Firearms Forum

Last edited by barth; 03-14-2012 at 15:54..
barth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2012, 16:12   #7
Bruce M
Senior Member
 
Bruce M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: S FL
Posts: 22,924
For me at least Sig has excellent customer service.


My P290 had to go back to Exeter a couple times before they got originally a no strike problem and then a light strike problem solved. Now it works fine and between me shooting/testing it and whatever they did in NH the trigger is much smoother now. The gun works well now. It is however a bit big and heavy for pocket carry. I remain of the opinion that the Rohrbaugh is what the other 9mm pocket pistols should be, size wise. But perhaps not in price.
__________________
Bruce
I never talked to anyone who had to fire their gun who said "I wished I had the smaller gun and fewer rounds with me" Just because you find a hundred people who agree with you on the internet does not mean you're right.

Last edited by Bruce M; 03-14-2012 at 16:21..
Bruce M is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2012, 18:46   #8
Caladan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 730
We have a P290, Beretta Nano, and Kahr PM9 in our collection. Since they are similar, the following comments are based on a comparison between the three.

The 290 has a very long trigger pull, with a mushy let-off. The pull weight is a bit higher than the Nano, and a lot heavier than the Kahr. The distance between the P290's backstrap and face of the trigger is shorter than the Nano, and since the pull is so long, the tip of your trigger finger ends up under your thumb. I much prefer the trigger of the Nano, which is shorter in pull length and has a more distinct let-off. The Kahr's trigger pull is much lighter in weight, but has a mushy let-off that is more of a roll-off than a break.

The 290 is a bit heavier than the Nano, and a lot heavier than the Kahr. The 290 is also the thickest because of the slide lock/release lever, and about the same thickness as the Nano otherwise. The subjective feeling of build quality is about the same between the Nano and the 290, and both are higher than that of the Kahr. I do like the 290's sights slightly more than that of the Nano, and a lot more than the Kahr's. The 290's sights stand up a smidge higher than the Nano's, and are a slight bit easier to pick up quickly upon presentation.

I shoot slightly better groups with the Nano than the 290, probably because I prefer the position and pull characteristics of the Nano's trigger. Both the 290 and Nano are substantially more accurate than the Kahr. Also, the Kahr's sights were off somewhat when it arrived, but both the Nano's and Sig's were spot on with 115gr FMJ at defense distances.

Overall, I do like the 290, but prefer the slightly lighter Nano. Both the Nano and the 290 are a better buy than the PM9, but anyone considering a micro-9 should also look at the Kahr CM9 as well. The CM9 is the same size as the PM9, but is priced less than the Nano or 290.

My 290 came with night sights and a laser for $475 otd, which is a better buy than the normal selling price of $429+tax of the Nano. If you want a laser for your handgun, then the 290 would be the way to go.

Last edited by Caladan; 03-14-2012 at 18:49..
Caladan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2012, 21:40   #9
Tiro Fijo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 6,245
Quote:
Originally Posted by FCastle88 View Post
The P290 is way too heavy for a pocket gun, and the 9lb trigger pull is a bit ridiculous. Still complaints of light strikes, hammer not falling, trigger not resetting, etc., according to Sig there's a redesigned trigger mechanism either already out, or being released soon. I'd go with a PM9/CM9 or Nano, my CM9 has been 100% reliable so far, and it's 4oz lighter than the P290 and has a nice 6.5lb trigger pull that feels lighter.

I have had a SIG p290 since last Spring and yes, mine had the light strikes, but SIG repaired it and it has been 100% since. As to the 9 lbs. trigger, it's not a Camp Perry match gun, it's a CCW weapon. Personally, I love the trigger as this is not a range gun. Then again, I learned to shoot decades ago with DA revolvers. My p290 will shoot with my p228 out to 15 yds. Mine has NEVER jammed and I have shot at least ten different types of HP bullets. For me it is not too heavy. I love it.

I think many people have unrealistic expectations in a micro 9mm. They want a gun that weighs 12 oz., has a 1911 match trigger with no safety AND doesn't kick!! Ain't gonna happen with the laws of physics & laibility laws in the USA today.
Tiro Fijo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2012, 22:11   #10
stopatrain
Lifetime Membership
Senior Member
 
stopatrain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,167
Looked at one didn't like it.
stopatrain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2012, 22:22   #11
SEH95B
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 349
Try a Kahr CM9 first
SEH95B is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2012, 22:42   #12
skeeter7
Brass Vulture
 
skeeter7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 6,976
I love my Sigs, the P290 is a nce looking gun, and I like the idea because I pocket carry sometimes but that thing is waaaay too heavy for what it is. Turned me off instantly.
__________________
NECC #401
skeeter7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2012, 03:50   #13
fowler
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: ohio
Posts: 3,861
9mm is a powerfull round and anything smaller than the goldstandard of sub-9mms the g26 will not last long or be relaible. And the G26 is not pants pocket gun in most cases. I don,t use pocket carry other than outside coat pockets. Pocket carry in pants can be hard to get at in a car with seat belts on. Allso its easy to pin your hands in your pocket blocking the draw. I use IWB or OWB holsters only. The G26 is still the most relaible subcompact 9mm.
fowler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2012, 11:47   #14
fastbolt
Senior Member
 
fastbolt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Within the lightning (Northern CA)
Posts: 9,870
Personally, I suspect there's a point of diminishing returns for some owners when it comes to increasingly smaller pistols.

I can't tell anyone else where that line occurs for them, though.

Also, over the years I've come to prefer to wait until any brand new design of handgun has been on the commercial market and out in the hands of users for a couple of years, allowing the gun maker to identify and resolve any minor issues that may have slipped through the R&D.

While I applaud Sig, Beretta & Ruger for trying to give shooters 9/.40 platforms that have had a little overall size & weight shaved off here & there with their newest offerings, I'll reserve judgement until they've all passed the 2 year point since public release.

I've got enough smallish pistols in the way of the 3913, CS9, SW999c, G26, 4040PD, G27, M&P 40c, etc.

For now, at any rate.

I learned the hard way that sometimes being the first on the block to run out and buy the latest & greatest really means that you've rushed to the head of the line to be the Beta Tester for the product.
__________________
Sub Club #9; .40 S&W Club #1953; S&W Club #3913
Retired LE - firearms instructor/armorer
fastbolt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2012, 16:01   #15
ROBSPLUMBER
'OP'
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Socialist State of Maryland
Posts: 10
Thanks everyone for your replies and your input. In my original post I failed to mention that I have had and sold a Glock 26 and Kahr CW9. Currently my carry gun is a Glock 19 which I really like and trust. It's just not possible in my line of work to waistband (inside or out) carry. I have to pocket or Smart Carry carry. The LCP worked well for me as a pocket carry, but like I mentioned, I would prefer a 9mm. After reading the post and doing some more research, I think I will try the Nano.
ROBSPLUMBER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2012, 16:14   #16
bonjorno2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Space Coast
Posts: 229
i had a 290 and sold it... it had the worst trigger i've ever felt. Sold my pm9 to get it and had it for a little bit and went back to kahr. It was too heavy to pocket carry vs the kahr was and it wasn't as well balanced (top heavy).
bonjorno2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2012, 16:16   #17
G26S239
NRA Patron
 
G26S239's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: PRK
Posts: 10,303
Quote:
Originally Posted by fowler View Post
9mm is a powerfull round and anything smaller than the goldstandard of sub-9mms the g26 will not last long or be relaible. And the G26 is not pants pocket gun in most cases. I don,t use pocket carry other than outside coat pockets. Pocket carry in pants can be hard to get at in a car with seat belts on. Allso its easy to pin your hands in your pocket blocking the draw. I use IWB or OWB holsters only. The G26 is still the most relaible subcompact 9mm.
Of course only Glock can make a small, durable, reliable 9mm.
__________________
Glock 17, 19, 21, 26 X 2, 32 and 36.
Proud member of the PigPen. Embrace the Pignose.

Last edited by G26S239; 03-15-2012 at 16:18..
G26S239 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2012, 18:07   #18
elde
Lifetime Membership
Senior Member
 
elde's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Tx
Posts: 1,450
Up to 800 rounds throught my Nano and after the first 200 have had no issues. Seems to prefer 124gr bullets either FMJ or JHPs. I carry it with GD 124gr +P JHPs and have had no problems. Like the trigger much better than the Kahrs (have PM9), the Ruger LC9 or the Sig 290. Carries very nicely in a Remora holster.
elde is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2012, 19:05   #19
G26S239
NRA Patron
 
G26S239's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: PRK
Posts: 10,303
Quote:
Originally Posted by elde View Post
Up to 800 rounds throught my Nano and after the first 200 have had no issues. Seems to prefer 124gr bullets either FMJ or JHPs. I carry it with GD 124gr +P JHPs and have had no problems. Like the trigger much better than the Kahrs (have PM9), the Ruger LC9 or the Sig 290. Carries very nicely in a Remora holster.
This kind of post makes me want a Nano. I have an MK9 that I like as much as I do my G26s. I use the 147 grain HST loads in it on the theory that they will perform more efficiently out of the 3" barrel than the lighter weights although I have used 115 and 124 in it as well. Have you tried 147s out of your Nano?
__________________
Glock 17, 19, 21, 26 X 2, 32 and 36.
Proud member of the PigPen. Embrace the Pignose.
G26S239 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2012, 19:27   #20
Danimal3805
Senior Member
 
Danimal3805's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Concord, NH
Posts: 859
Send a message via Yahoo to Danimal3805
PF9 PF9 PF9 PF9. Oh have you heard of the PF9? There's this awesome pocket size (for me) pistol called the kel tec PF9. It's great. Or maybe a PF9.....hahahaha

Outdoor Hub mobile, the outdoor information engine
__________________
RIA1911 Tacti-cool, PF9 (EDC), Ruger SR22 .22LR Pistol (plink-O-matic)
Danimal3805 is offline   Reply With Quote

 
  
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:37.




Homepage
FAQ
Forums
Calendar
Advertise
Gallery
GT Wiki
GT Blogs
Social Groups
Classifieds


Users Currently Online: 952
276 Members
676 Guests

Most users ever online: 2,672
Aug 11, 2014 at 2:31