Home Forums Classifieds Blogs Today's Posts Search Social Groups



  
SIGN-UP
Notices

Glock Talk
Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.

 
  
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-10-2012, 08:10   #1
piccopower
still a noob :(
 
piccopower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Missouri, Greenwood
Posts: 138
+p+ in 38...yes ... no....

Do they make it for the 38?
Is it worth it?
Instead of using 357 magnum maybe +p+????
Anyone?
__________________
Luke 11:21
piccopower is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2012, 08:27   #2
JBnTX
JB in Tx
 
JBnTX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 14,658
I've never heard of .38 special +P+ ammo.

Personally I'd just get a .357 if I needed that much more power.

Why take the chance of ruining a perfectly good .38 special.
JBnTX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2012, 08:30   #3
banger
Senior Member
 
banger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Where evil lives
Posts: 1,379
Quote:
Originally Posted by piccopower View Post
Do they make it for the 38?
Is it worth it?
Instead of using 357 magnum maybe +p+????
Anyone?
Do they make it?

It was the FIRST caliber that was manufactured in +p and +P+.

These loads go back to the late 70's/early 80's period, when the overwhelming majority of law enforcement carried revolvers.

Do a search on "Treasury load".

As to the suitability to your particular needs...That would depend on the revolver you intend to load them into.

Last edited by banger; 05-10-2012 at 08:32..
banger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2012, 08:49   #4
meathead19
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: greenville, SC
Posts: 2,818
I have about 25 rds of the Winchester .38 +p+ that was given to me in trade. They're stamped 88 on the bottom, so I'm assuming they're made in 1988.

The gun I rec'd was a 686-3, that I feel should be fine with firing these, just haven't done so yet.
meathead19 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2012, 09:17   #5
piccopower
still a noob :(
 
piccopower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Missouri, Greenwood
Posts: 138
Quote:
Originally Posted by banger View Post
Do they make it?

It was the FIRST caliber that was manufactured in +p and +P+.

These loads go back to the late 70's/early 80's period, when the overwhelming majority of law enforcement carried revolvers.

Do a search on "Treasury load".

As to the suitability to your particular needs...That would depend on the revolver you intend to load them into.
It would be 357 revolver.....if they don't then magnum would do.
__________________
Luke 11:21
piccopower is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2012, 09:29   #6
ronin.45
Senior Member
 
ronin.45's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: NE OHIO
Posts: 8,925
It would be very dependent on the gun. I'd have no problem shooting them in a magnum gun. I'd be hesitant to put them through a vintage airweight.
__________________
As I go through life I keep coming to the same conclusion, people are generally stupid.
ronin.45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2012, 09:43   #7
fastbolt
Senior Member
 
fastbolt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Within the lightning (Northern CA)
Posts: 9,791
A buddy of mine who carried a S&W M60 when he worked with the CHP was required to carry it in his M60 as an off-duty weapon. It was the standard issue CHP ammunition for a while (although different individual field offices sometimes maintained a supply of 125gr .357 Magnum for those officers who could qualify with it).

Yes, you occasionally heard of it accelerating wear & tear on the steel J-frame .38's of that time (late 70's through the 90's). I'd not shoot it in an Airweight, myself. (Not even in one rated for a steady diet of +P loads.)

I once fired hundreds of rounds of it through an early production 640, but it was one of the limited number of them that was actually marked for +P+ loads (on the frame, inside the cylinder window). It had more felt recoil than shooting 158gr +P through my Airweight (642-1), and I used up the +P+ loads in the 640 to help acclimate myself to shooting a lot of +P in my then-new Airweight.

I think I'm down to just a single box of the old 110gr +P+ Winchester Treasury Load (from having access to cases of it some years ago). I'll probably keep it as a souvenir of earlier days.

We have much better performing .38 ammunition nowadays.
__________________
Sub Club #9; .40 S&W Club #1953; S&W Club #3913
Retired LE - firearms instructor/armorer

Last edited by fastbolt; 05-10-2012 at 09:46..
fastbolt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2012, 10:09   #8
countrygun
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 17,068
Quote:
Originally Posted by piccopower View Post
Do they make it for the 38?
Probably

Is it worth it?
NO

Instead of using 357 magnum maybe +p+????
Why?

Anyone?

If bullet placement is correct,a few fps won't add anything. If the placement isn't correct a few fps won't turn a bad shot into a good one.
countrygun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2012, 10:46   #9
piccopower
still a noob :(
 
piccopower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Missouri, Greenwood
Posts: 138
Quote:
Originally Posted by countrygun View Post
If bullet placement is correct,a few fps won't add anything. If the placement isn't correct a few fps won't turn a bad shot into a good one.
Just asking because of the difference in power,noise, and kick in a 2inch.
__________________
Luke 11:21
piccopower is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2012, 10:55   #10
boone10
Glockeologist
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Alabama
Posts: 300
Modern bullets are designed to expand at lower velocities (i.e. Gold Dot 135 +p) and have a proven record on the streets. The older stuff loaded +p+ are topped off with a "less desirable hollow point" and IMHO are just not worth the possible problems in my particular revolvers. I do, however, have a lever-action Marlin .357 that would eat 'em up for sure.
boone10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2012, 11:01   #11
countrygun
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 17,068
Quote:
Originally Posted by piccopower View Post
Just asking because of the difference in power,noise, and kick in a 2inch.

Just trying to point out that you quickly reach a point of "diminishing returns" at which the increase in noise and kick increases disproportionately to the increase in useful power. I got my first 2 1/2" .357 in about 1980 and I soon learned that, for me, not matter how hard I trained, my groups were bigger, and my times slower with the .357 ammo. It seemed, again just my opinion, that since I was throwing basically the same bullet (in weight and diameter) slower, bigger groups was not a result I was going to be happy with.
countrygun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2012, 12:07   #12
bac1023
Senior Member
 
bac1023's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: PA
Posts: 91,693
I never understood the point of +P+ ammo regardless of the caliber.

If you need more power, step up to another round.
__________________
.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
bac1023 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2012, 12:10   #13
Berto
woo woo
 
Berto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: WA
Posts: 29,913


The +P+ stuff was usually a story of diminishing returns since they didn't yield the performance commensurate with 24K psi pressures.

Fed and Win loaded a 147gr +P+, basically a 9mm jhp bullet in a .38sp case. The Win version chrono'd mid 900fps in a 2" ported snubby (Taurus 85TT), the same in a 3" model 36, 975fps in a 2.5" model 242 L frame snubby and 1050fps in my 4" model 15.
The Fed 147gr +P+ Hydrashok was usually about 50fps slower than the Win version.

Corbon loaded a truly hot +P+ 115gr .38sp, also used a 9mm jhp bullet. This one was said to be about 26K psi, chrono'd 1200fps in J frame snubbies, over 1400fps in a 4" K frame. Fast.

The Treasury Load +P+ 110gr was quoted for having similar numbers as the Corbon, but chrono work I've seen is usually 1100fps in snubbies, 1300 in 4" guns. It worked decent from whats been written of it, but a shallow penetrator usually by FBI standards.

Federal also had a +P+ 125gr jhp LE only, chrono'd 1050-1100fps in snubbies.

With today's powders (like Power Pistol) and better loads like Buffalo Bore, you don't need +P+ anymore to get the same performance, though I still have some of the Win +P+ 147gr laying around somewhere.
__________________
The West is the Best.
Berto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2012, 12:40   #14
hotpig
CLM Number 211
IAFF Local 4766
 
hotpig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: SW / West Central Illinois
Posts: 4,456


I sell a lot of the 110gr +P+ ammo. The various +P rounds sell better because more guns can use them and they are not as stout.
__________________
Keep your guns stashed and your powder dry.
hotpig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2012, 13:14   #15
257 roberts
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 462
we carried Winchester Silver Tips 110gr +P+ in S&W 10 back in the early 80's....it worked!!!
257 roberts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2012, 13:25   #16
glockdoc21
Senior Member
 
glockdoc21's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 816
For me it turned a pistol that was difficult to make hits with (smith 642) into one that was almost impossible to make hits with. YMMV
__________________
It's not the arrow, it's the indian
glockdoc21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2012, 13:32   #17
Berto
woo woo
 
Berto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: WA
Posts: 29,913


Quote:
Originally Posted by glockdoc21 View Post
For me it turned a pistol that was difficult to make hits with (smith 642) into one that was almost impossible to make hits with. YMMV
It's the Indian.
__________________
The West is the Best.
Berto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2012, 13:44   #18
bac1023
Senior Member
 
bac1023's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: PA
Posts: 91,693
Quote:
Originally Posted by Berto View Post
It's the Indian.
__________________
.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
bac1023 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2012, 15:28   #19
CBennett
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: PA/Covered by LEOSA
Posts: 11,437
Quote:
Originally Posted by JBnTX View Post
I've never heard of .38 special +P+ ammo.

Personally I'd just get a .357 if I needed that much more power.

Why take the chance of ruining a perfectly good .38 special.
^ this is my answer heck I dont always use P+ at all I often just have the old FBI load standard pressure(158 grain LSWCHP). Right now im running some 135 grain P+ I think though but no id not use +p+ even if I could.
CBennett is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2012, 15:29   #20
CBennett
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: PA/Covered by LEOSA
Posts: 11,437
Quote:
Originally Posted by bac1023 View Post
I never understood the point of +P+ ammo regardless of the caliber.

If you need more power, step up to another round.
^ also agree 100% step up to .357 magnum at that point
CBennett is offline   Reply With Quote

 
  
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 21:26.




Homepage
FAQ
Forums
Calendar
Advertise
Gallery
GT Wiki
GT Blogs
Social Groups
Classifieds


Users Currently Online: 1,059
317 Members
742 Guests

Most users ever online: 2,672
Aug 11, 2014 at 2:31