[DonGlock26]

A Censored Race War


http://www.nationalreview.com/articl...thomas-sowell#


He's right on the money.


_

[JBnTX]

Maybe this is what they're trying to prevent?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1968_Chicago_riots

..

[concretefuzzynuts]

Originally Posted by DonGlock26

A Censored Race War


http://www.nationalreview.com/articl...thomas-sowell#


He's right on the money.


_

He always is.

[maxsnafu]

Originally Posted by JBnTX

Maybe this is what they're trying to prevent?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1968_Chicago_riots

..

It's pretty revealing how the police will almost never say that Black on White violence was racially motivated. I wonder how long it will be before Whites as a group realize that the police are taking sides against them.

[aircarver]

Originally Posted by DonGlock26

A Censored Race War


http://www.nationalreview.com/articl...thomas-sowell#


He's right on the money.


_

........which is why he won't be listened to in the Black Socialist community ....

.

[Gundude]

Those who automatically say that the social pathology of the ghetto is due to poverty, discrimination, and the like cannot explain why such pathology was far less prevalent in the 1950s, when poverty and discrimination were worse. But there were not nearly as many grievance mongers and race hustlers then.

There also weren't nearly as many avenues of mass communication then, so that it may have been censored even more than it is today, and we wouldn't know it. Maybe it's the censorship, and not the shortage of race hustlers, which kept a lid on such pathology in the 50's.

Not saying that's the case, but by ignoring that possibility, the article is seriously flawed.

[wprebeck]

Originally Posted by maxsnafu

It's pretty revealing how the police will almost never say that Black on White violence was racially motivated. I wonder how long it will be before Whites as a group realize that the police are taking sides against them.

Just can't pass up a chance, can you?

[DonGlock26]

Originally Posted by maxsnafu

It's pretty revealing how the police will almost never say that Black on White violence was racially motivated. I wonder how long it will be before Whites as a group realize that the police are taking sides against them.

The average civil servant is not immune to the PC speech codes of the establishment elites. People tend not to fall on their swords like they do in the movies. It is up to the voters to overturn the establishment.

_

[maxsnafu]

Originally Posted by DonGlock26

The average civil servant is not immune to the PC speech codes of the establishment elites. People tend not to fall on their swords like they do in the movies. It is up to the voters to overturn the establishment.

_

That isn't going to happen. For a representative democracy to function properly you must have an informed, involved electorate. Ours is neither.

I do hope that if there's a break down of civil society people remember which side the police chose--the marauders.

[Mister_Beefy]

Originally Posted by DonGlock26

The average civil servant is not immune to the PC speech codes of the establishment elites. People tend not to fall on their swords like they do in the movies. It is up to the voters to overturn the establishment.

_

this. remember folks, everything the police do wrong is the fault of their politician overlords.

[maxsnafu]

Originally Posted by Mister_Beefy

this. remember folks, everything the police do wrong is the fault of their politician overlords.

The "I was only following orders" defense didn't fly at Nuremberg. Why is it valid now?

[maxsnafu]

Originally Posted by DonGlock26

A Censored Race War


http://www.nationalreview.com/articl...thomas-sowell#


He's right on the money.


_

Well, partially right.

http://www.alternativeright.com/main...ions/race-war/

Some of the comments on the article are more correct.

[Wake_jumper]

It's the elephant in the room

[maxsnafu]

Originally Posted by DonGlock26

The average civil servant is not immune to the PC speech codes of the establishment elites. People tend not to fall on their swords like they do in the movies. It is up to the voters to overturn the establishment.

_

Here's a quotation that perfectly describes the police mindset: “It will never be known what acts of cowardice have been committed for fear of not looking sufficiently progressive.”

[Rally Vincent]

Damn good read.

[maxsnafu]

http://isteve.blogspot.com/2012/05/t...e-injured.html

[RustyShackelford]

Originally Posted by maxsnafu

It's pretty revealing how the police will almost never say that Black on White violence was racially motivated. I wonder how long it will be before Whites as a group realize that the police are taking sides against them.

Because there's so few blacks in prison, and they're full of white folk, right?

[maxsnafu]

Originally Posted by RustyShackelford

Because there's so few blacks in prison, and they're full of white folk, right?

You're talking about a different issue, but you knew that.

[DonGlock26]

Originally Posted by maxsnafu

Here's a quotation that perfectly describes the police mindset: “It will never be known what acts of cowardice have been committed for fear of not looking sufficiently progressive.”

Some blacks do get charged with hate crimes. I've also seen prosecutors refuse to charge them. What's a cop to do? I do think that black flash mob attacks have been minimized by the police executives, city officials, and the media in major urban areas.

I use to listen to a libertarian talk show host who advised not throwing one's self in front of the establishment juggernaut. I don't see the non-PC public forcing the Feds to back off of civil rights violation witch hunts of police officers (Zimmerman is about to get one too). Do you?

Let's Take taxes for instance. Why do you pay them to support the welfare state? Aren't you a coward?

The point is that the Conservatives and libertarians need to use the political process to smash the progressive establishment.

_

[maxsnafu]

Originally Posted by DonGlock26

Some blacks do get charged with hate crimes. I've also seen prosecutors refuse to charge them. What's a cop to do? I do think that black flash mob attacks have been minimized by the police executives, city officials, and the media in major urban areas.

I use to listen to a libertarian talk show host who advised not throwing one's self in front of the establishment juggernaut. I don't see the non-PC public forcing the Feds to back off of civil rights violation witch hunts of police officers (Zimmerman is about to get one too). Do you?

Let's Take taxes for instance. Why do you pay them to support the welfare state? Aren't you a coward?

The point is that the Conservatives and libertarians need to use the political process to smash the progressive establishment.

_

If voting changed anything it would be illegal.

[series1811]

Originally Posted by maxsnafu

It's pretty revealing how the police will almost never say that Black on White violence was racially motivated. I wonder how long it will be before Whites as a group realize that the police are taking sides against them.

When you say "the police will almost never say", who are you talking about?

Because, except for public information officers, and chiefs, what police officers say anything to the public, one way or the other?

And, when a PIO or chief says something, who do you think they consult with first, the mayor and city council, or the beat cops?

Where you work, how often does the boss check with you, before he makes a statement to the public?

[Mister_Beefy]

Originally Posted by maxsnafu

The "I was only following orders" defense didn't fly at Nuremberg. Why is it valid now?

that, detective, is the right question.

I robot "you must ask the right questions" - YouTube

I robot "you must ask the right questions" - YouTube