Home Forums Classifieds Blogs Today's Posts Search Social Groups



  
SIGN-UP
Notices

Glock Talk
Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.

 
  
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-16-2012, 09:57   #1
Bilbo Bagins
Slacked jawed
 
Bilbo Bagins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 11,213
Does the Diamonback 380 still suck

Its a shame, I got a chance to hold one and see it dissembled the other day. It is almost the perfect pocket gun. Lightweight, good trigger, usable sights, and glock like in look and takedown. The captive recoil spring and internals also look top notch.

But even though the gun wow'ed me, I know of way to many horror stories with the DB380. However i have to ask, has manufacturing improved on these guns? Shouldn't they have worked out all the bugs by now?
Bilbo Bagins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2012, 16:55   #2
hoghunter82
FL Glocker #182
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 857
Can only give you my opinion, Diamondback makes far better airboats than they do pistols. Drive by their shop in Cocoa, FL and see for yourself. Maybe you will get a good one, maybe not. If its a gun you want for fun then roll the dice. If it is to protect your family, then there are far better choices out there. Let us know what you decide.


Outdoor Hub mobile, the outdoor information engine
hoghunter82 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2012, 18:46   #3
Bruce M
Senior Member
 
Bruce M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: S FL
Posts: 23,577
When I first heard of the DB9 I was intrigued. What I have read here and what one of the guys at the LGS who I trust has indicated, the intrigue faded.
__________________
Bruce
I never talked to anyone who had to fire their gun who said "I wished I had the smaller gun and fewer rounds with me" Just because you find a hundred people who agree with you on the internet does not mean you're right.
Bruce M is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2012, 19:00   #4
deputy tom
Senior Member
 
deputy tom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: western PA
Posts: 8,333
Probably.I'll pass. tom.
__________________
N.R.A. LIFE MEMBER

SPES MEA IN DEO EST

Thig crioch air an t-saoghal ach mairidh gaol agus cel The world will come to an end but music and love will endure

Last edited by deputy tom; 07-16-2012 at 19:02..
deputy tom is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2012, 19:48   #5
bac1023
Senior Member
 
bac1023's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: PA
Posts: 93,290
I never appealed to me at all.

That said, I never shot one, but I don't like the way they feel in hand.
__________________
.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
bac1023 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2012, 19:51   #6
Ljutic
Senior Member
 
Ljutic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 155
If you have a choice between the .380 and the 9mm, get the 9mm. I'm fairly active on the DB Forum and results seem to be evenly split. Some get good ones, and some don't get good ones. My original was one of the first 250 off the production line. It's had over 1200 through it in the year and it's still working fine.

I did a one year follow up review on that pistol and it ran 99 of 100 rounds with no problems. The video is long, but I tried to catch the action as it happened. I also break out the second DB9 near the end of the video.


Bottom line is if you get a good one, they are pretty nice. If you get a bad one, you are in for some drama.
__________________
Author and solo contributor to the Pocket Guns and Gear blog.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
Ljutic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2012, 20:55   #7
CDR_Glock
Senior Member
 
CDR_Glock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,265
I was one of the unlucky DB9 owners and mine was a higher serial number. Originally, the first 300 had some issues, I believe, and by number 5000, they had things worked out. Mine was in the 9000s, maybe? They had an issue with walking pins but had a free fix for it. My frame cracked and they replaced it but it never even got close to shooting reliably. It was total frustration. I asked my gunsmith and he said sell it. So I did and I luckily found a Ruger Mark II Target Competition 67/8" barrel.

However, mine was never reliable for carry. I would have been better off finding a railroad nail on the street and defending myself with it, rather than the Diamondback. I lovingly called my gun the DiamondCrap DB9. Ljutic got lucky. I didn't. To me, it's not worth the gamble.

If you're looking in 380, get the LCP or P238. I've had bother but positive experiences with my P238.

If you're looking at 9mm, look at the S&WS Shield, Kahr CW9, Glock 26, or Sig P938. I have the P938 and it's finicky with certain ball ammo. I haven't run across JHPs that it won't feed, and I'm loading +P.
__________________
Lifetime Member of the NRA

My YouTube Channel:

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
CDR_Glock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2012, 20:58   #8
NEOH212
Diesel Girl
 
NEOH212's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: North East Ohio
Posts: 9,094
Quote:
Does the Diamonback 380 still suck
Don't know about the Diamondback but the .380 still sucks.
__________________
When you finish speaking, don't forget to wipe.
NEOH212 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2012, 09:42   #9
maxpower220
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 222
Read up about them at Diamondbacktalk.com There are a lot of discussions that will clue you in.

Never had the DB .380, I only had the DB9. While it is easy to say "just go get the Shield/PM9/LCP/etc", DB does offer size and weight advantages over all of them. So much so, that it is hard to discount the DB. If you read up and understand what you may experience and go through with it, then you can't be disappointed. Good luck.
maxpower220 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2012, 10:19   #10
fnfalman
Chicks Dig It
 
fnfalman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: California & New Mexico, US
Posts: 57,655


The Diamondback .38 Special is pretty sweet though.
__________________
Can you dig it?
fnfalman is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2012, 10:20   #11
Bob Hafler
Senior Member
 
Bob Hafler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,205
Personally I've never even held one. There reputation is so bad I never gave them much thought as a gun I might like to own. I don't know if they ever got there problems straightened out but I haven't heard anything of a positive note either. There's to many other good guns on the market
to give a gun of questionable reliability much thought, much less my money.
Bob Hafler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2012, 20:29   #12
mr.scott
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 433
I have a db380 and carry it every day. I've never had a problem with it.
mr.scott is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2012, 21:23   #13
CDR_Glock
Senior Member
 
CDR_Glock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,265
Quote:
Originally Posted by fnfalman View Post
The Diamondback .38 Special is pretty sweet though.
All Colts are pretty sweet. I have two Pythons but they're not exactly pocket carry:

4" Python
8" Python

If you read Ljutic's blog then you're better prepared for how to make yours work. I read Ljutic's P938 has been as bad as my DB9, so that is all luck of the draw, I guess. For me, I'm happy that I got a $700+ gun that worked, instead of a $350 gun that didn't. I shoot weekly, and rotate various pistols every 2-3 weeks; especially for CC. They have to put up with lots of ammo in my place.

To the OP: Good luck with whatever you get. Bear in mind all mouse guns can be finicky with ammo and guaranteed not to operate with limp wristing.
__________________
Lifetime Member of the NRA

My YouTube Channel:

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
CDR_Glock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2012, 23:01   #14
arkdweller22
Senior Member
 
arkdweller22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,031
Quote:
Originally Posted by NEOH212 View Post
Don't know about the Diamondback but the .380 still sucks.
So true...

I bought one of the early ones. Worst gun purchase ever, for me. Diamondback sent me one of the newer ones after several trips to the factory and it was just as bad as the first.

Two acquaintances of mine had similar experiences, one with the .380 and one with the 9.

My advice, if it's not obvious by now, keep away.

On a positive note, it also cemented my decision to never carry a .380. Plenty of good tiny 9's out there (not the DB however...).

Last edited by arkdweller22; 07-17-2012 at 23:01..
arkdweller22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2012, 04:44   #15
Narkcop
Senior Member
 
Narkcop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 2,698
I had one of the first 8mm DB pistols around here. It sucked. FTF,FTE on and on.
Narkcop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2012, 07:53   #16
ChicagoZman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Indiana
Posts: 985
DB9 owner here. Could not get the gun to run on any ammo I tried until I tried Hornady Critical Defense 115gr. Works like a champ using it.
__________________
Glock and M&P Armorer
NRA Pistol Instructor
Illinois Concealed Carry Instructor
Glocks: 17, 17L, 22, 22C, 23, 24C, 27, 34
ChicagoZman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2012, 08:24   #17
Bob Hafler
Senior Member
 
Bob Hafler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,205
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChicagoZman View Post
DB9 owner here. Could not get the gun to run on any ammo I tried until I tried Hornady Critical Defense 115gr. Works like a champ using it.
Wow That's got to make for some expensive range time not being able to shoot target loads.
Bob Hafler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2012, 10:31   #18
ca survivor
Senior Member
 
ca survivor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 7,798
don't like the name or the way it looks, don't know how it feels because I'm not shooting one
ca survivor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2012, 10:36   #19
ca survivor
Senior Member
 
ca survivor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 7,798
Quote:
Originally Posted by Narkcop View Post
I had one of the first 8mm DB pistols around here. It sucked. FTF,FTE on and on.
try it with 9mm it might work
ca survivor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2012, 10:42   #20
TxDoubleAgent
Member
 
TxDoubleAgent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Farmersville, TX.
Posts: 99
Send a message via AIM to TxDoubleAgent Send a message via Yahoo to TxDoubleAgent
In short....Yes.
__________________
Μολὼν λαβέ
Be Quick or be Dead
G26 Gen4
XD-.40 4" service with Nebo 190 lumin tac. light
XD-.40sc
TxDoubleAgent is offline   Reply With Quote

 
  
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 17:13.




Homepage
FAQ
Forums
Calendar
Advertise
Gallery
GT Wiki
GT Blogs
Social Groups
Classifieds


Users Currently Online: 1,158
363 Members
795 Guests

Most users ever online: 2,672
Aug 11, 2014 at 2:31