Home Forums Classifieds Blogs Today's Posts Search Social Groups



  
SIGN-UP
Notices

Glock Talk
Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.

 
  
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-23-2012, 02:50   #1
TBO
CLM Number 122
Why so serious?
 
TBO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: NRA Life Member
Posts: 46,464
Blog Entries: 1


Anoka County Judge John Dehen wants to carry gun at work (MN)

http://www.startribune.com/local/north/180544691.html
TBO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2012, 02:58   #2
TK-421
Senior Member
 
TK-421's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 6,860
I don't see why he shouldn't be allowed to carry a gun in his court room.
TK-421 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2012, 11:56   #3
rvrctyrngr
Senior Moment
 
rvrctyrngr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gator Nation
Posts: 5,578


Perfectly legal here in FL.
__________________
Director,

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.


Detached reflection cannot be demanded in the presence of an uplifted knife.
-Justice Oliver Wendel Holmes Brown v. United States, 1921
rvrctyrngr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2012, 16:12   #4
SCmasterblaster
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Hartford, Vermont
Posts: 16,034
Is he an anti-gun judge, BTW?
__________________
Gun Ownership Offers Freedom in Many Dimensions
SCmasterblaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2012, 16:19   #5
Gun Shark
Senior Member
 
Gun Shark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 5,186
Send a message via AIM to Gun Shark Send a message via MSN to Gun Shark Send a message via Yahoo to Gun Shark


Quote:
Originally Posted by TK-421 View Post
I don't see why he shouldn't be allowed to carry a gun in his court room.
My feelings as well.


Posted using Outdoor Hub Campfire
__________________
It's better to be judged by 12 than carried by 6.

"No freeman shall ever be debarred the use of arms." --Thomas Jefferson

"Age is an issue of mind over matter. If you don't mind, it doesn't matter."
Gun Shark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2012, 20:03   #6
redbaron007
Lifetime Membership
A Nice Prick!
 
redbaron007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Southwest Missouri
Posts: 7,124
I say go for it. Sounds legal and a great a plan.



red
__________________
TopGun *357sig* Club - #2632
The 10 Ring #00720

R.I.P. Cajunator® ~ R.I.P. JTull7
R.I.P. Mullah (aka El_Ron1) ~ R.I.P. GioaJack ~ R.I.P. Okie
redbaron007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2012, 18:18   #7
glock_collector
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 851
If I had to deal with some of the folks the judge does, I'd carry too.
glock_collector is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2012, 18:23   #8
janice6
Platinum Membership
NRA
 
janice6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: minnesota
Posts: 19,618


If he can, I want to too.

(All men are created equal. "What about Kings? Kings are equal too". I'm screwed) Credit: Wizard of Id.
__________________
janice6

"Peace is that brief, glorious moment in history when everybody stands around reloading". Anonymous

Earp: Not everyone who knows you hates you.
DOC: I know it ain't always easy bein' my friend....but I'll BE THERE when you need me.
janice6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2012, 19:00   #9
jlavallee
Senior Member
 
jlavallee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 816
hmmm, I don't recall the 2nd Amendment saying anything about only being allowed to keep and bear arms at certian times.
__________________
Someday, I may be found lying dead in a ditch somewhere, but I’ll be lying in a pile of brass.

Track bills in Congress and tell politicians your opinion.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
jlavallee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2012, 19:48   #10
jtull7
Pistolero
 
jtull7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Santa Fe, New Mexico
Posts: 6,840
All judges and prosecutors in Texas have their own special CCW.
__________________
Cocked, locked, and ready to rock!

Every day I face Ogden, Utah, and pray that God might bless John Moses Browning.

Outpost Member #69 I collect and shoot many fine firearms. CCW: NM, CT, and NH. N5JHT. WFR. Former LEO. SAR. Bilateral trans-tibial amputee. Survivor of bubonic plague. Tough sum-*****.

Last edited by jtull7; 11-24-2012 at 19:48..
jtull7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2012, 19:57   #11
TBO
CLM Number 122
Why so serious?
 
TBO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: NRA Life Member
Posts: 46,464
Blog Entries: 1


Quote:
Originally Posted by jlavallee View Post
hmmm, I don't recall the 2nd Amendment saying anything about only being allowed to keep and bear arms at certian times.
Everything in life has limits. The question is, what are they?

Last edited by TBO; 11-24-2012 at 19:58..
TBO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2012, 20:59   #12
jlavallee
Senior Member
 
jlavallee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 816
Quote:
Originally Posted by TBO View Post
Everything in life has limits. The question is, what are they?
The entire concept of our system is that we don't have any of our basic rights infringed upon unless we've shown just cause to justify it. Even then, a permanent or long term restriction of freedoms is supposed to require a unaminous verdict from our peers in a court of law.

If our right to be free of searches is to be violated then a judge is supposed to have been shown cause upon oath or affirmation. If a person has been convicted of a violent crime then that is the requirement to restrict access to the 2nd. It is never on the basis of a universal limit but based on personal actions that are as a result of wrong doing by the party in question.

If you've not done anything to justify a loss of liberty, other folks have no right to take it away. Now if the judge worked for a private business that didn't want guns on the property that would be different.

I'm stopping now, as the question indicates that the poster has no idea on how liberty and individualism works at all.
__________________
Someday, I may be found lying dead in a ditch somewhere, but I’ll be lying in a pile of brass.

Track bills in Congress and tell politicians your opinion.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
jlavallee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2012, 22:07   #13
TBO
CLM Number 122
Why so serious?
 
TBO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: NRA Life Member
Posts: 46,464
Blog Entries: 1


Quote:
Originally Posted by jlavallee View Post
The entire concept of our system is that we don't have any of our basic rights infringed upon unless we've shown just cause to justify it. Even then, a permanent or long term restriction of freedoms is supposed to require a unaminous verdict from our peers in a court of law.

If our right to be free of UNREASONABLE searches is to be violated then a judge is supposed to have been shown cause upon oath or affirmation. If a person has been convicted of a violent crime then that is the requirement to restrict access to the 2nd. It is never on the basis of a universal limit but based on personal actions that are as a result of wrong doing by the party in question.

If you've not done anything to justify a loss of liberty, other folks have no right to take it away. Now if the judge worked for a private business that didn't want guns on the property that would be different.

I'm stopping now, as the question indicates that the poster has no idea on how liberty and individualism works at all.
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
__________________
"Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing had happened."

"If you have integrity, nothing else matters. If you don't have integrity, nothing else matters".

"A person who won't reason has no advantage over one who can't reason."

"Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored."

“Ignorance is a lot like alcohol: the more you have of it, the less you are able to see its effect on you.”


Originally Posted by Rooster Rugburn:
Didn't the whole sheepdog thing actually start right here on Glock Talk? A bunch of wannabees bought a bunch of T-shirts and took an oath to defend those who won't defend themselves?
TBO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2012, 23:46   #14
jlavallee
Senior Member
 
jlavallee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 816
Quote:
Originally Posted by TBO View Post
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
Yes exactly, unreasonable unless upon probable cause. That means unless a person has done something or someone else swears that they have and spells out the exact details, there is no reason to issue a warrant. The Constitution was written in clear language so even the most simple could understand their rights.
__________________
Someday, I may be found lying dead in a ditch somewhere, but I’ll be lying in a pile of brass.

Track bills in Congress and tell politicians your opinion.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
jlavallee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2012, 23:55   #15
TBO
CLM Number 122
Why so serious?
 
TBO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: NRA Life Member
Posts: 46,464
Blog Entries: 1


Quote:
Originally Posted by jlavallee View Post
Yes exactly, unreasonable unless upon probable cause. That means unless a person has done something or someone else swears that they have and spells out the exact details, there is no reason to issue a warrant. The Constitution was written in clear language so even the most simple could understand their rights.
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

The above also does not say a warrant is needed for a search. Merely that no warrant shall be issued that lacks PC, Oath, and description.
__________________
"Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing had happened."

"If you have integrity, nothing else matters. If you don't have integrity, nothing else matters".

"A person who won't reason has no advantage over one who can't reason."

"Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored."

“Ignorance is a lot like alcohol: the more you have of it, the less you are able to see its effect on you.”


Originally Posted by Rooster Rugburn:
Didn't the whole sheepdog thing actually start right here on Glock Talk? A bunch of wannabees bought a bunch of T-shirts and took an oath to defend those who won't defend themselves?
TBO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2012, 00:10   #16
jlavallee
Senior Member
 
jlavallee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 816
Quote:
Originally Posted by TBO View Post
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

The above also does not say a warrant is needed for a search. Merely that no warrant shall be issued that lacks PC, Oath, and description.
A warrant is the writ that allows an otherwise illegal violation to take place. Get a dictionary, you're making yourself look bad.
__________________
Someday, I may be found lying dead in a ditch somewhere, but I’ll be lying in a pile of brass.

Track bills in Congress and tell politicians your opinion.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
jlavallee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2012, 00:17   #17
jlavallee
Senior Member
 
jlavallee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 816
Here, if you can't be troubled to read maybe Judge Nap can spell it out for you.

__________________
Someday, I may be found lying dead in a ditch somewhere, but I’ll be lying in a pile of brass.

Track bills in Congress and tell politicians your opinion.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
jlavallee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2012, 00:25   #18
TBO
CLM Number 122
Why so serious?
 
TBO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: NRA Life Member
Posts: 46,464
Blog Entries: 1


There are many searches and or seizures that require no warrant.

Sent from the toe of my jack boot using Tapatalk 2
__________________
"Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing had happened."

"If you have integrity, nothing else matters. If you don't have integrity, nothing else matters".

"A person who won't reason has no advantage over one who can't reason."

"Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored."

“Ignorance is a lot like alcohol: the more you have of it, the less you are able to see its effect on you.”


Originally Posted by Rooster Rugburn:
Didn't the whole sheepdog thing actually start right here on Glock Talk? A bunch of wannabees bought a bunch of T-shirts and took an oath to defend those who won't defend themselves?
TBO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2012, 00:30   #19
TK-421
Senior Member
 
TK-421's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 6,860
Quote:
Originally Posted by TBO View Post
There are many searches and or seizures that require no warrant.

Sent from the toe of my jack boot using Tapatalk 2
Like when a cop comes to your house for a noise complaint, looks in your window and sees a bong on your table, he is allowed entrance into your home, without a warrant, to seize the bong.
TK-421 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2012, 08:06   #20
EAJuggalo
Senior Member
 
EAJuggalo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Eagan, MN
Posts: 2,000
Send a message via AIM to EAJuggalo Send a message via Yahoo to EAJuggalo


Quote:
Originally Posted by TK-421 View Post
Like when a cop comes to your house for a noise complaint, looks in your window and sees a bong on your table, he is allowed entrance into your home, without a warrant, to seize the bong.
The LEO shouldn't be able to legally seize the bong without warrant unless there is some other reason to believe it's been used with controlled substances. There is nothing illegal about having a water pipe for tobacco in any state I am aware of.
__________________
People killed by:
MN permit holders 3
MPLS Light Rail 9
Updated 3-22-13
EAJuggalo is offline   Reply With Quote

 
  
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 14:55.




Homepage
FAQ
Forums
Calendar
Advertise
Gallery
GT Wiki
GT Blogs
Social Groups
Classifieds


Users Currently Online: 999
275 Members
724 Guests

Most users ever online: 2,672
Aug 11, 2014 at 2:31