Home Forums Classifieds Blogs Today's Posts Search Social Groups



  
SIGN-UP
Notices

Glock Talk
Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.

 
  
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-04-2012, 21:37   #1
TBO
CLM Number 122
Why so serious?
 
TBO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: NRA Life Member
Posts: 45,422
Blog Entries: 1


Isanti County road rage: Gun permit wasn't at issue

Isanti County road rage: Gun permit wasn't at issue

Sheriff investigating road rage case said Joseph Kadlec had passed background check.


http://www.startribune.com/local/north/172482271.html
TBO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2012, 21:49   #2
Schlitz
Senior Member
 
Schlitz's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 330
People commit crimes everyday without a license/permit to carry their gun. This is just a good news story/attempt to bring bad attention to shall issue laws.
__________________
The general rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the form and name of law, is in reality no law, ...
Schlitz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2012, 21:51   #3
Patchman
Florist
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Land of Flora, Fauna & Merriweather
Posts: 12,372
Quote:
Joseph D. Kadlec, 71, of Cambridge, Minn., was charged Tuesday with three felonies in the shooting outside the Isanti Police Department parking lot on Saturday.
Since the shooting occurred outside a LE parking lot, it must have been either (1) LE's fault through negligence, or (2) entrapment.

But more importantly, what was the shooter's GT handle?





__________________
In a gunfight, even if you do everything right, can still get you killed.

And thank YOU for being perfect, all the time, every time. Go forth and reproduce. We need more of you.
Patchman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2012, 21:58   #4
Schlitz
Senior Member
 
Schlitz's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 330
Quote:
Originally Posted by Patchman View Post
But more importantly, what was the shooter's GT handle?
__________________
The general rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the form and name of law, is in reality no law, ...
Schlitz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2012, 22:00   #5
janice6
Platinum Membership
NRA
 
janice6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: minnesota
Posts: 19,162


He sounds like a piece of trash serving out vigilante justice.

Intentionally hitting another vehicle isn't a "threat to others"? How about twice?
__________________
janice6

"Peace is that brief, glorious moment in history when everybody stands around reloading". Anonymous

Earp: Not everyone who knows you hates you.
DOC: I know it ain't always easy bein' my friend....but I'll BE THERE when you need me.
janice6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2012, 22:03   #6
Caver 60
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Midwest
Posts: 3,791
Lets see, intentional ramming and accelerating to throw a guy off his motor bike among other things. This guy had never used a 'weapon' before???

So he deserved a permit???
Caver 60 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2012, 00:49   #7
TDC20
Senior Member
 
TDC20's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 610
Quote:
Originally Posted by janice6 View Post
He sounds like a piece of trash serving out vigilante justice.

Intentionally hitting another vehicle isn't a "threat to others"? How about twice?
I have to agree. This guy should have been charged twice with assault. I would think that's pretty much deadly force when you ram another vehicle. So the fact that the Sheriff's office didn't do their job the first two times (they didn't tell the details of the other 3 "road rage" incidents), and thus identify this jackass as being a violent public menace, they now try to pass this off as a "We didn't have any reason to deny him a permit" case. I'm not buying it. The Sheriff screwed up multiple times, and then used the "no reason to deny" argument to cover up their negligence of their public duty. I'm not saying it's a conspiracy against "shall issue", unless being stupid can be called a conspiracy.
__________________
A handgun is only good for fighting your way to a rifle.
TDC20 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2012, 02:38   #8
NEOH212
Diesel Girl
 
NEOH212's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: North East Ohio
Posts: 9,091
Quote:
Originally Posted by janice6 View Post
He sounds like a piece of trash serving out vigilante justice.

Intentionally hitting another vehicle isn't a "threat to others"? How about twice?
It amazes me that this turd could have a drivers license much less a license to carry a firearm.

I hope he gets locked up for the rest of his life.

What a turd POS.
__________________
When you finish speaking, don't forget to wipe.
NEOH212 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2012, 08:43   #9
Drain You
NRA member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,832
Quote:
in the face...........was taken to Hennepin County Medical Center, where he was admitted, treated and released


Wth was the oldster carrying, a .25?
Drain You is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2012, 11:28   #10
ballr4lyf
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 412
Why was he released with just a warning after he rammed the motorcyclist and caused him to get thrown from his vehicle? Seriously... Why would you just give him a warning?
ballr4lyf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2012, 14:24   #11
jph02
Senior Member
 
jph02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,425
Quote:
Originally Posted by TDC20 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by janice6 View Post
He sounds like a piece of trash serving out vigilante justice.

Intentionally hitting another vehicle isn't a "threat to others"? How about twice?
I have to agree. This guy should have been charged twice with assault. I would think that's pretty much deadly force when you ram another vehicle. So the fact that the Sheriff's office didn't do their job the first two times (they didn't tell the details of the other 3 "road rage" incidents), and thus identify this jackass as being a violent public menace, they now try to pass this off as a "We didn't have any reason to deny him a permit" case. I'm not buying it. The Sheriff screwed up multiple times, and then used the "no reason to deny" argument to cover up their negligence of their public duty. I'm not saying it's a conspiracy against "shall issue", unless being stupid can be called a conspiracy.
This and this.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Drain You View Post
Wth was the oldster carrying, a .25?
jph02 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2012, 19:06   #12
SCmasterblaster
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Hartford, Vermont
Posts: 16,020
Jeesh, what next?
__________________
Gun Ownership Offers Freedom in Many Dimensions
SCmasterblaster is offline   Reply With Quote

 
  
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:24.




Homepage
FAQ
Forums
Calendar
Advertise
Gallery
GT Wiki
GT Blogs
Social Groups
Classifieds


Users Currently Online: 1,074
290 Members
784 Guests

Most users ever online: 2,672
Aug 11, 2014 at 2:31