GlockTalk.com
Home Forums Classifieds Blogs Today's Posts Search Social Groups



  
SIGN-UP
Notices

Glock Talk
Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.

 
  
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-08-2012, 19:42   #1
Flintlocker
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,247
Budget crunched: The facts of Romney’s proposed $2 trillion Defense Increas

http://ricks.foreignpolicy.com/posts...fense_increase

Political Issues
Flintlocker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2012, 19:48   #2
The Machinist
No Compromise
 
The Machinist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: The Left Coast
Posts: 6,010
Are you at all capable of defending anything in Obama's record? Just curious.
__________________
Proud to be an infidel!
The Machinist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2012, 19:55   #3
Flintlocker
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,247
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Machinist View Post
Are you at all capable of defending anything in Obama's record? Just curious.
I'm wondering if any of you are going to bother to respond to anything Romney does or says. All you do is try to change the subject and toss out schoolyard taunts like the children you appear to be.
Flintlocker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2012, 20:00   #4
The Machinist
No Compromise
 
The Machinist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: The Left Coast
Posts: 6,010
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flintlocker View Post
I'm wondering if any of you are going to bother to respond to anything Romney does or says. All you do is try to change the subject and toss out schoolyard taunts like the children you appear to be.
You like to make driveby posts, and rarely read anything by anyone else. You ought to already know I'm not voting for Romney. I can defend my vote and my beliefs all day long. I'm asking you if you can defend Obama and his record.
__________________
Proud to be an infidel!
The Machinist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2012, 20:02   #5
GAFinch
Senior Member
 
GAFinch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Georgia
Posts: 5,796
From the article:

Quote:
DOD's 2013 base budget excluding war funds is $525 billion, which equals 3.3 percent of GDP. Under Obama's plan, it will continue to grow modestly in future years. Romney has said that he wants to reverse the Obama-era cuts, return to the 2010 plan crafted by Robert Gates, and set the goal of spending 4 percent of GDP on defense. Those three objectives are different, so he'll have some wiggle room should he become president.

Let's compare Romney's third objective to Obama's plan. We'll run two scenarios for Romney. Under "Ramp Up," he increases defense spending by 0.1 percent of GDP per year until it reaches 4 percent and keeps it there. Under "Immediate," he increases defense spending to 4 percent of GDP immediately and keeps it there.
Quote:
Why is there such a big difference between Obama and Romney? Because GDP tends to get bigger over the long run, so indexing defense spending to GDP will cause the defense budget to grow -- sometimes rapidly -- in perpetuity.
Quote:
Readers should note a few things. First, cost estimates are not an exact science. Second, defense spending today is relatively low in historical terms when measured as a percentage of GDP. Third, inflation continually saps DOD's buying power, so defense spending increases are not as mighty as they appear. Fourth, the "4 percent for defense" plan has percolated among policymakers like Robert Gates and within think tanks for years.
GAFinch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2012, 20:02   #6
DOC44
Senior Member
 
DOC44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 10,921
both of y'all are a waste.

Doc44
__________________
Have Gun Will Travel
DOC44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2012, 20:05   #7
Flintlocker
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,247
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Machinist View Post
You like to make driveby posts, and rarely read anything by anyone else. You ought to already know I'm not voting for Romney. I can defend my vote and my beliefs all day long. I'm asking you if you can defend Obama and his record.
Ok, fair enough. I think Obama's defense spending, as depicted on the graph above, is reasonable considering we've left Iraq. I think Romney's plan for a $2 Trillion increase, that the Pentagon hasn't asked for, is absolutely bat**** crazy. Couple that with his massive tax cut plans and it's a recipe for financial disaster.
Flintlocker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2012, 20:08   #8
QNman
resU deretsigeR
 
QNman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 10,532
An awful lot of assumptions and extrapolation there. Like the selection of 2022 as the end point - 10 years? Why? Romney couldn't possibly be POTUS for that long.

If the dollars spent are wasted for four years, certainly the Dems can mount a better defense against him?

That said, if Rick of Ricks Foreign Policy, a writer with arguably good foreign policy credentials, is correct is his assumptions, then Romney and I may have some slight differences. Not enough to make me support Obama - who apparently is entirely unable to run on one shred of a four year record.
__________________
"I am sick and tired of people who say that if you debate and you disagree with this administration, somehow you're not patriotic. We should stand up and say we are Americans and we have a right to debate and disagree with any administration." - Hillary Clinton, 2003

TERM LIMITS NOW!!!

Last edited by QNman; 10-08-2012 at 20:09..
QNman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2012, 20:10   #9
QNman
resU deretsigeR
 
QNman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 10,532
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flintlocker View Post
I'm wondering if any of you are going to bother to respond to anything Romney does or says. All you do is try to change the subject and toss out schoolyard taunts like the children you appear to be.
Is that a "no"?
__________________
"I am sick and tired of people who say that if you debate and you disagree with this administration, somehow you're not patriotic. We should stand up and say we are Americans and we have a right to debate and disagree with any administration." - Hillary Clinton, 2003

TERM LIMITS NOW!!!
QNman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2012, 20:12   #10
QNman
resU deretsigeR
 
QNman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 10,532
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flintlocker View Post
Ok, fair enough. I think Obama's defense spending, as depicted on the graph above, is reasonable considering we've left Iraq. I think Romney's plan for a $2 Trillion increase, that the Pentagon hasn't asked for, is absolutely bat**** crazy. Couple that with his massive tax cut plans and it's a recipe for financial disaster.
Wow... you got one whole sentence about Obama's plan out before resorting, once again, to Romney bashing.

Anything in the last four years you're particularly proud of? Anything you hope to see four more years of?
__________________
"I am sick and tired of people who say that if you debate and you disagree with this administration, somehow you're not patriotic. We should stand up and say we are Americans and we have a right to debate and disagree with any administration." - Hillary Clinton, 2003

TERM LIMITS NOW!!!
QNman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2012, 20:19   #11
stormspotter
Senior Member
 
stormspotter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Tornado alley
Posts: 2,145
Looks like we'll be in for some much needed rain thursday thru sunday. Might even have to do some spotting if conditions are right.



Thursday Scattered showers and thunderstorms after 8am. Mostly cloudy, with a high near 70. Chance of precipitation is 40%. New rainfall amounts of less than a tenth of an inch, except higher amounts possible in thunderstorms.

Thursday Night Showers and thunderstorms likely, mainly after 8pm. Mostly cloudy, with a low around 52. Chance of precipitation is 60%.

Friday Showers and thunderstorms likely. Mostly cloudy, with a high near 64. Chance of precipitation is 60%.

Friday Night Scattered showers and thunderstorms. Cloudy, with a low around 58. Chance of precipitation is 40%.

Saturday Scattered showers and thunderstorms. Mostly cloudy, with a high near 75. Chance of precipitation is 50%.
Saturday Night Scattered showers and thunderstorms. Mostly cloudy, with a low around 56. Chance of precipitation is 50%.

Sunday Scattered showers and thunderstorms. Mostly sunny, with a high near 72. Chance of precipitation is 40%.
stormspotter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2012, 21:18   #12
cowboy1964
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 15,238
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flintlocker View Post
I'm wondering if any of you are going to bother to respond to anything Romney does or says. All you do is try to change the subject
Pot calling kettle.
cowboy1964 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2012, 21:22   #13
QNman
resU deretsigeR
 
QNman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 10,532
Quote:
Originally Posted by cowboy1964 View Post
Pot calling kettle.
I keep wondering if he's capable of an entire paragraph on the last four years and how prosperous they were, giving clear reasons for why we should vote FOR Obama, instead of simply bashing Romney and repeating the leftist talking points on a right-leaning forum...

I guess not.
__________________
"I am sick and tired of people who say that if you debate and you disagree with this administration, somehow you're not patriotic. We should stand up and say we are Americans and we have a right to debate and disagree with any administration." - Hillary Clinton, 2003

TERM LIMITS NOW!!!
QNman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2012, 21:22   #14
cowboy1964
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 15,238
FY 2010 defense spending was 4.7%. Romney wants it to be about 4%. 4% is the level that the people-in-the-know think is reasonable. Too bad there are so many UNreasonable, intellectually bereft, people out there that continue to be the pawns and lackeys of the left.

Wanna talk trillions? Let's talk about the $5 trillion O has added to the debt in four years. That's $50,000 for every taxpayer in this country. Pony up.

Last edited by cowboy1964; 10-08-2012 at 21:25..
cowboy1964 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2012, 21:56   #15
engineer151515
_______________
 
engineer151515's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 20,757


Quote:
Originally Posted by Flintlocker View Post
.... I think Romney's plan for a $2 Trillion increase, that the Pentagon hasn't asked for, is absolutely bat**** crazy. .............
Can you substantiate this statement. The Romney "plan" for a $2 Trillion increase Pentagon hasn't asked for?


So Obama's policy sounds so much more . . "sane"?
Political Issues


Plus these additional "bat**** crazy opinions from a source your original article references:

Quote:
Several Obama Administration officials—including Secretary of Defense Bob Gates, former Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Admiral Mike Mullen, and former National Security Adviser General James Jones—have argued that the American people should, as a goal, seek to devote 4 percent of our GDP to national defense.
http://www.mittromney.com/issues/national-defense

Plus these little quotes from your article

Quote:
Second, defense spending today is relatively low in historical terms when measured as a percentage of GDP. Third, inflation continually saps DOD's buying power, so defense spending increases are not as mighty as they appear..
and

Quote:
In the broadest sense, Romney's plan is affordable if the necessary political decisions are made.
all make me wonder how you Liberals how you make this stuff up.
__________________
"We better get back, cause it'll be dark soon. And they mostly come at night - mostly." - Newt - Aliens

Last edited by engineer151515; 10-08-2012 at 22:12..
engineer151515 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2012, 04:34   #16
Brucev
Senior Member
 
Brucev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 9,189
Looks like sequestering is the best option for reigning in the dod and its enmeshed symbiotic industries. Much better than increased spending that yields no return to the middle class.
Brucev is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2012, 04:50   #17
Bren
NRA Life Member
 
Bren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 36,155
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flintlocker View Post
I'm wondering if any of you are going to bother to respond to anything Romney does or says. All you do is try to change the subject and toss out schoolyard taunts like the children you appear to be.
That's all your posts merit. What did you say? Not a single word. Just somebody else's graph and story. You get what your posts are worth.

As for the defense budget, we've been getting annual raises the DOD/Army specifically asked congress NOT to give during the Obama administration, so it would be hard to point at Romney for the same, even if true.
__________________
Quote:
This is the internet, where you could pretend to be anything you want; so how come so many people on this forum pretend to be limpwristed sissies?
- Me, 2014.

Last edited by Bren; 10-09-2012 at 04:52..
Bren is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2012, 05:07   #18
Bruce H
Senior Member
 
Bruce H's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: missouri
Posts: 4,618
So get a sharp stick and defend the nation from the maurading hords idiot.
__________________
I try to take one day at a time, but sometimes several days attack me at once.
Bruce H is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2012, 05:14   #19
pugman
Senior Member
 
pugman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 6,216
Ah..I can see the American politican continues to succeed pitting Democrat/Liberal vs Republican/Conservative vs Third party - let them argue each other to death throwing barbs - while all along politicans continue to treat this country like a $20 trick and laugh all the way to the bank.

Any way you spend it - they are spending money we don't have.

Notice how the entire article quotes spending as a portion of GDP. When did we get away from the idea of a budget? Why quote GDP - because the numbers then don't seem as bad.

So now instead of the federal government tell us how much they will spend (aka a budget) now they just say we will take a percentage of what you make kind of like...the mob?

Just a thought: maybe if they cut/maintained military spending the military would spend it more efficiently? Remember, these are the same idiots who spent $5 billion dollars to develop a camo pattern they aren't going to use.
__________________
Now when asked when I think things will change I answer "The next time Thomas (aka the fed) robs Peter (aka the 53%) to pay Paul (aka the 47%) and Peter pulls a gun...things will change"

Last edited by pugman; 10-09-2012 at 05:18..
pugman is offline   Reply With Quote

 
  
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:22.




Homepage
FAQ
Forums
Calendar
Advertise
Gallery
GT Wiki
GT Blogs
Social Groups
Classifieds


Users Currently Online: 965
264 Members
701 Guests

Most users ever online: 2,672
Aug 11, 2014 at 2:31