GlockTalk.com
Home Forums Classifieds Blogs Today's Posts Search Social Groups



  
SIGN-UP
Notices

Glock Talk
Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.

 
  
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-03-2012, 07:59   #1
TLHelmer
Senior Member
 
TLHelmer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Newburgh, In. U.S.
Posts: 6,921
Question about my Aimpoint ML3

I have sighted in a number of scopes and a few Eotechs, but this is my first Aimpoint.

I normally install my Eotechs after sighting in my iron sights. When I do this I align the precision dot on the tip of the front of the iron sight post when it is centered through the rear sight (peep hole). I have found that while this isnt always the eventual exact point it needs to be once you have sighted in the Eotech, it is usually close and limits the number of rounds it takes to finish sighting in the optics system.

Back to the Aimpoint question. I did the same thing with the Aimpoint ML3. I have moved the dial as far as it will go to the right (the dial R that is) and it is still too far to the right of the front post by an 1/8 of an inch. I know that could end up being where it needs to be in the end, but what concerns me is that I have already exhasted my ability to move it any farther towards the post. I would go and actually sight it in today except that I need to wait 24 hours for the Locktite to dry on all the mounting screws.

Has anyone else experienced this? AS I said I am new to Aimpoints. I have never had this with the Eotechs I have owned or used.
TLHelmer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2012, 08:29   #2
ak103k
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: PA- In the shadow of the Shade
Posts: 705
I always just dialed the dot onto the post (actually I split the dot on the tip) with mine, like youre saying you do with your Eotechs. Never had any issue doing it that way, and the final zero was always real close.

What kind of mount are you using? Maybe thats the issue.
__________________
Zeitgeist - The movie

Zeitgeist - Addendum
ak103k is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2012, 08:36   #3
TLHelmer
Senior Member
 
TLHelmer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Newburgh, In. U.S.
Posts: 6,921
It is an ARMS mount with a spacer. I mounted it and re-mounted it to be sure.
TLHelmer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2012, 08:56   #4
faawrenchbndr
CLM Number 281
The Dude Abides
 
faawrenchbndr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: east of East St. Louis
Posts: 33,849
Sounds as if the mount is jacked.
I stopped using ARMS years ago, I would suggest a Larue mount
faawrenchbndr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2012, 08:57   #5
ak103k
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: PA- In the shadow of the Shade
Posts: 705
I have a couple on ARM's mounts as well, and they havent been a problem. Well, except on my SOCOM, but that was the fault of the rail and not the mount.

Just rereading your post, you say the dot is to the right of the post and your trying to dial it more right? Seems you need to go left with the dot. No?
__________________
Zeitgeist - The movie

Zeitgeist - Addendum
ak103k is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2012, 09:17   #6
K. Foster
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Mo.
Posts: 2,142
Quote:
Originally Posted by TLHelmer View Post
I have moved the dial as far as it will go to the right (the dial R that is) and it is still too far to the right of the front post by an 1/8 of an inch.
You need to go shoot the gun and see if you really have a problem. You may be putting the cart before the horse.
__________________
An amateur trains until he gets it right, a professional trains until he can't get it wrong.
K. Foster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2012, 09:53   #7
MrMurphy
Lifetime Membership
*********
 
MrMurphy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Buried in the X-files
Posts: 31,704
ARMS mount AND spacer are both the problem.

They're notoriously pieces of crap.

Get rid of the mount, replace it with an LT129 from LaRue, or a Daniel Defense. Either is fine. Even the factory QRP is better than an ARMS and that's saying something.

Most Aimpoints you can 'dot on front sight' and be fairly close. I've zeroed half a dozen Aimpoints with around five rounds each that way. It's not guaranteed but it's usually close.
__________________
"And Shepherds we shall be. For thee, my Lord for thee. Power hath descended forth from thy hand, that our feet may swiftly carry out thy command. So we shall flow a river forth to thee and teeming with souls shall it ever be. In nomine Patris, et fili, et Spiritus Sancti. Amen."
MrMurphy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2012, 10:29   #8
WoodenPlank
Who?
 
WoodenPlank's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NW Florida
Posts: 7,793
Double check to make sure your Aimpoint isn't canted in the mount. If you didn't have any excessive adjustment problems on your irons, and the Aimpoint is level inside the mount, then you have a dud mount. At that point, I will agree with Murphy and strongly suggest ordering a LaRue LT-129. I have one for my Aimpoint M2, and it's excellent.
__________________
Never argue with an idiot. They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.

Last edited by WoodenPlank; 11-03-2012 at 11:11..
WoodenPlank is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2012, 11:00   #9
Cole125
Silver Membership
Senior Member
 
Cole125's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Far West, USA
Posts: 7,593
Throw your mount in the trash, and buy a LaRue mount, now. You should not have to adjust to the extreme end of either adjustments.

Forget your iron sights, sight the red dot all the way on paper. Its what I do with good results.
Cole125 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2012, 11:17   #10
TLHelmer
Senior Member
 
TLHelmer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Newburgh, In. U.S.
Posts: 6,921
Thanks for your responses. I will let you know what the answer seems to be.
TLHelmer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2012, 12:09   #11
faawrenchbndr
CLM Number 281
The Dude Abides
 
faawrenchbndr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: east of East St. Louis
Posts: 33,849
Seems if you knew the answer you would not have posted here, buy a Larue mount.

As for the ARMS mount,.........not worth a nickel to me.

Last edited by faawrenchbndr; 11-03-2012 at 12:54..
faawrenchbndr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2012, 15:10   #12
TLHelmer
Senior Member
 
TLHelmer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Newburgh, In. U.S.
Posts: 6,921
Ok! I took the mount and spacer completely apart top to bottom and put it back together. It is alligned correctly now.

Thanks for all of your responses.
TLHelmer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2012, 15:29   #13
faawrenchbndr
CLM Number 281
The Dude Abides
 
faawrenchbndr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: east of East St. Louis
Posts: 33,849
Awesome news,.......a free fix!
faawrenchbndr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2012, 15:38   #14
Big Bird
NRA Life Member
 
Big Bird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 10,639
I've shot an ARMs mount on one of my rifles for years with no issues. Larue makes a great mount but don't buy all the hype. ARMS makes good mounts.
__________________
Big Bird,

“Est Nulla Via Invia Virute”
Big Bird is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2012, 18:33   #15
MrMurphy
Lifetime Membership
*********
 
MrMurphy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Buried in the X-files
Posts: 31,704
Yeah, that's why a couple thousand guys sent broken ARMS mounts to LaRue and got them replaced.

I've had a guy who had an ARMS break simply riding in a vehicle. Won't ever trust them, even when they're the only option.

ARMS survives on ignorance and government contracts, by having been around a while and getting in when there was no competition.
__________________
"And Shepherds we shall be. For thee, my Lord for thee. Power hath descended forth from thy hand, that our feet may swiftly carry out thy command. So we shall flow a river forth to thee and teeming with souls shall it ever be. In nomine Patris, et fili, et Spiritus Sancti. Amen."
MrMurphy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2012, 19:11   #16
ak103k
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: PA- In the shadow of the Shade
Posts: 705
Quote:
I've shot an ARMs mount on one of my rifles for years with no issues. Larue makes a great mount but don't buy all the hype. ARMS makes good mounts.
Thats been my experience as well.

Ive had an ARMS #35 as well as a #22M68 mated to the same gun for over ten years now, and they have both held up well to regular use, and have always held zero when removed and replaced. I also have/had a couple other #22M68's, as well as a couple of sets of their #22 lever scope rings, and they have always worked as advertised as well.

Ive had a couple of LaRue Aimpoint mounts too, and they do make a nice mount, and they work well too. The only issue had with one was with the same SOCOM I had trouble with using the ARMS mount. The ARMS mounts/rings would at least go on the gun and were still usable, where the LaRue would not go on at all. The problem was in fact Springfields rail, and neither that of ARMS or LaRue.

Quote:
Yeah, that's why a couple thousand guys sent broken ARMS mounts to LaRue and got them replaced.
Sounds like a sales gimmick on LaRue's part. I wonder how many were really "broke", and how many were just wore out and/or abused being turned in for new?

Quote:
ARMS survives on ignorance and government contracts, by having been around a while and getting in when there was no competition.
I would think if ARMS was that bad, and LaRue that good, the contracts would show a shift from one to the other. Is that in fact the case? I havent been following this stuff to closely of late, but how much of LaRues stuff is now under contract and being issued?
__________________
Zeitgeist - The movie

Zeitgeist - Addendum
ak103k is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2012, 19:16   #17
faawrenchbndr
CLM Number 281
The Dude Abides
 
faawrenchbndr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: east of East St. Louis
Posts: 33,849
Never had an issue like the OP did with any Larue mount.

It is what it is what it is! If the OP is happy with an ARMS mount,
great. Seems like this should be an eye opener for his first experience
with an ARMS product. I would be pissed as heJJ!
faawrenchbndr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2012, 20:30   #18
USMCsilver
Boat Life ©
 
USMCsilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Middle of SC
Posts: 24,187
Send a message via AIM to USMCsilver Send a message via Yahoo to USMCsilver
I, too, have ARMS mounts. Four to be exact. I also have three of their flip-up sights.

All were purchased over 5 years ago, and all have worked flawlessly.

Sad to hear that they aren't what they used to be.

Outta curiosity -- has GG&G gone to ****, too?
__________________
The Original USMCsilver©.

"Kiss my ass, I bought a boat! I'm goin' out to sea..." (Jimmy Buffett covering Lovett)
USMCsilver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2012, 20:48   #19
ak103k
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: PA- In the shadow of the Shade
Posts: 705
Quote:
Outta curiosity -- has GG&G gone to ****, too?
I have a set of their BUIS and an Aimpoint cantilever mount on my one AR, and its been first rate kit. Its the same vintage as my ARMS stuff though.

My buddy did just get a couple of their Aimpoint mounts last year though, and he seems happy with them so far.
__________________
Zeitgeist - The movie

Zeitgeist - Addendum
ak103k is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2012, 05:48   #20
faawrenchbndr
CLM Number 281
The Dude Abides
 
faawrenchbndr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: east of East St. Louis
Posts: 33,849
I've never cared for the design of any GG&G products, never used them.
faawrenchbndr is offline   Reply With Quote

 
  
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:14.




Homepage
FAQ
Forums
Calendar
Advertise
Gallery
GT Wiki
GT Blogs
Social Groups
Classifieds


Users Currently Online: 828
251 Members
577 Guests

Most users ever online: 2,672
Aug 11, 2014 at 2:31